Question on Notice regarding the potential negative impact of a development on endangered flora and fauna, and whether alternative, previously cleared sites were considered. Asks for details on species affected, risks, and management strategies.

⏳ Awaiting AnswerQoN 6432Legislative Council
Asked
17 June 2008
Portfolio
Health

QuestionView source ↗

(1) Did the flora and vegetation assessment for the site indicate that development will or may have a negative impact on any critically endangered species?
(2) If yes to (1), -
(a) which species;
(b) what is the nature of the risk; and
(c) how will the risk to each species be managed?
(3) Did the fauna assessment for the site indicate that development of the site will or may have a negative impact on any fauna species, whether specifically on site or in the metropolitan area generally?
(4) If yes to (3), -
(a) which species?
(b) what is the nature of the risk?
(c) how will the risk to each species be managed?
(5) Have any previously cleared sites been considered as an alternative site for the development?
(6) If yes to (5), for each alternative site, -
(a) what is the location of the site; and
(b) what are the reasons it was rejected?
Answered on

AnswerView source ↗

This question is awaiting a response from the Minister.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more