Question regarding lack of urinalysis for prisoner Paul Stephen Keating and consideration for release without it. The Attorney General denies Keating is being considered for release.

AnsweredQoN 639Legislative Council
Asked
3 April 2003
Portfolio
Attorney General

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to the prisoner Paul Stephen Keating -
(1) Why, as at the end of November 2002, has this prisoner not been subject to any urinalysis with respect to his current sentence?
(2) Why is the prisoner Keating being considered for release without having been subject to urinalysis?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
6 May 2003
Responded by
Minister for Racing and Gaming representing the Attorney General
Response time
33 days
(2) Not applicable. Mr Keating is not being considered for release by the Attorney General.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more