❓ A WA parliamentary question seeks clarification on the Shire of Kalamunda's processes for handling applications to the Community Cultural and Arts Facilities Fund, specifically regarding Alpha Studios' application and the timeline for informing them of the outcome. The response details the process and provides dates, contradicting the initial claim of a three-month delay.
AnsweredQoN 737Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(1) What processes and protocols does the Shire of Kalamunda follow when considering an application to the community cultural and arts facilities fund? (2) Were those processes and protocols applied to Alpha Studios in its application during the pilot rounds of funding, which closed in May 2005? (3) Why did it take the shire three months after the closing date for applications to inform Alpha Studios that its application had not been approved by the shire or forwarded to the CCAFF? Hon KIM CHANCE
AnswerView source ↗
On behalf of the Minister for Fisheries, I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The Shire of Kalamunda has advised that the process is as follows: the submitted application is reviewed; the application is discussed with the applicant; the item is referred to the executive management committee for consideration; the executive management committee decides whether to support the application; and the applicant is advised. (2) Yes. (3) Applications closed at 4.00 pm on 8 July 2005. The applicant was informed by a letter dated 5 August 2005.
(2) Were those processes and protocols applied to Alpha Studios in its application during the pilot rounds of funding, which closed in May 2005? (3) Why did it take the shire three months after the closing date for applications to inform Alpha Studios that its application had not been approved by the shire or forwarded to the CCAFF? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: On behalf of the Minister for Fisheries, I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The Shire of Kalamunda has advised that the process is as follows: the submitted application is reviewed; the application is discussed with the applicant; the item is referred to the executive management committee for consideration; the executive management committee decides whether to support the application; and the applicant is advised. (2) Yes. (3) Applications closed at 4.00 pm on 8 July 2005. The applicant was informed by a letter dated 5 August 2005.
(3) Why did it take the shire three months after the closing date for applications to inform Alpha Studios that its application had not been approved by the shire or forwarded to the CCAFF? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: On behalf of the Minister for Fisheries, I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The Shire of Kalamunda has advised that the process is as follows: the submitted application is reviewed; the application is discussed with the applicant; the item is referred to the executive management committee for consideration; the executive management committee decides whether to support the application; and the applicant is advised. (2) Yes. (3) Applications closed at 4.00 pm on 8 July 2005. The applicant was informed by a letter dated 5 August 2005.
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: On behalf of the Minister for Fisheries, I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The Shire of Kalamunda has advised that the process is as follows: the submitted application is reviewed; the application is discussed with the applicant; the item is referred to the executive management committee for consideration; the executive management committee decides whether to support the application; and the applicant is advised. (2) Yes. (3) Applications closed at 4.00 pm on 8 July 2005. The applicant was informed by a letter dated 5 August 2005.
On behalf of the Minister for Fisheries, I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The Shire of Kalamunda has advised that the process is as follows: the submitted application is reviewed; the application is discussed with the applicant; the item is referred to the executive management committee for consideration; the executive management committee decides whether to support the application; and the applicant is advised. (2) Yes. (3) Applications closed at 4.00 pm on 8 July 2005. The applicant was informed by a letter dated 5 August 2005.
(1) The Shire of Kalamunda has advised that the process is as follows: the submitted application is reviewed; the application is discussed with the applicant; the item is referred to the executive management committee for consideration; the executive management committee decides whether to support the application; and the applicant is advised. (2) Yes. (3) Applications closed at 4.00 pm on 8 July 2005. The applicant was informed by a letter dated 5 August 2005.
(2) Yes. (3) Applications closed at 4.00 pm on 8 July 2005. The applicant was informed by a letter dated 5 August 2005.
(3) Applications closed at 4.00 pm on 8 July 2005. The applicant was informed by a letter dated 5 August 2005.
(2) Were those processes and protocols applied to Alpha Studios in its application during the pilot rounds of funding, which closed in May 2005? (3) Why did it take the shire three months after the closing date for applications to inform Alpha Studios that its application had not been approved by the shire or forwarded to the CCAFF? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: On behalf of the Minister for Fisheries, I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The Shire of Kalamunda has advised that the process is as follows: the submitted application is reviewed; the application is discussed with the applicant; the item is referred to the executive management committee for consideration; the executive management committee decides whether to support the application; and the applicant is advised. (2) Yes. (3) Applications closed at 4.00 pm on 8 July 2005. The applicant was informed by a letter dated 5 August 2005.
(3) Why did it take the shire three months after the closing date for applications to inform Alpha Studios that its application had not been approved by the shire or forwarded to the CCAFF? Hon KIM CHANCE replied: On behalf of the Minister for Fisheries, I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The Shire of Kalamunda has advised that the process is as follows: the submitted application is reviewed; the application is discussed with the applicant; the item is referred to the executive management committee for consideration; the executive management committee decides whether to support the application; and the applicant is advised. (2) Yes. (3) Applications closed at 4.00 pm on 8 July 2005. The applicant was informed by a letter dated 5 August 2005.
Hon KIM CHANCE replied: On behalf of the Minister for Fisheries, I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The Shire of Kalamunda has advised that the process is as follows: the submitted application is reviewed; the application is discussed with the applicant; the item is referred to the executive management committee for consideration; the executive management committee decides whether to support the application; and the applicant is advised. (2) Yes. (3) Applications closed at 4.00 pm on 8 July 2005. The applicant was informed by a letter dated 5 August 2005.
On behalf of the Minister for Fisheries, I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The Shire of Kalamunda has advised that the process is as follows: the submitted application is reviewed; the application is discussed with the applicant; the item is referred to the executive management committee for consideration; the executive management committee decides whether to support the application; and the applicant is advised. (2) Yes. (3) Applications closed at 4.00 pm on 8 July 2005. The applicant was informed by a letter dated 5 August 2005.
(1) The Shire of Kalamunda has advised that the process is as follows: the submitted application is reviewed; the application is discussed with the applicant; the item is referred to the executive management committee for consideration; the executive management committee decides whether to support the application; and the applicant is advised. (2) Yes. (3) Applications closed at 4.00 pm on 8 July 2005. The applicant was informed by a letter dated 5 August 2005.
(2) Yes. (3) Applications closed at 4.00 pm on 8 July 2005. The applicant was informed by a letter dated 5 August 2005.
(3) Applications closed at 4.00 pm on 8 July 2005. The applicant was informed by a letter dated 5 August 2005.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.