Hon. Cheryl Davenport questions the Minister for Transport regarding Westrail's legal costs associated with an appeal against the release of a review on timber railway sleepers. The Minister clarifies that the FOI request was directed to the Minister, not Westrail, and therefore Westrail incurred no costs.

AnsweredQoN 395Legislative Council
Asked
7 November 2000
Portfolio
Transport

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to the minister’s appeal to the Supreme Court against the decision of the Information Commissioner that the review of Westrail’s use of timber railway sleepers be released. What have been Westrail’s legal costs to date and what are the anticipated future legal costs? Hon M.J. CRIDDLE

AnswerView source ↗

I thank the member for some notice of this question. The freedom of information application was directed to the Minister for Transport, not to Westrail. Westrail has not incurred any legal costs and is not expected to incur any legal costs in the future in respect of this matter.
Hon M.J. CRIDDLE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. The freedom of information application was directed to the Minister for Transport, not to Westrail. Westrail has not incurred any legal costs and is not expected to incur any legal costs in the future in respect of this matter.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. The freedom of information application was directed to the Minister for Transport, not to Westrail. Westrail has not incurred any legal costs and is not expected to incur any legal costs in the future in respect of this matter.
The freedom of information application was directed to the Minister for Transport, not to Westrail. Westrail has not incurred any legal costs and is not expected to incur any legal costs in the future in respect of this matter.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more