❓ The Leader of the Opposition questions the Finance Minister regarding payment security for subcontractors on the Perth Stadium project and why similar provisions aren't applied to all government projects. The Minister acknowledges variations due to project value and mentions a new project bank account initiative.
AnsweredQoN 475Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
PERTH STADIUM — SUBCONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
475. Mr M. McGOWAN to the Minister for
Finance:
I refer to the security of payment
provisions on page 94 of ''The new Perth Stadium DBFM Project: Design,
Build, Finance and Maintain (DMFM) Project Agreement'', which states
that if —
... the State becomes aware that
Project Co has failed to pay an amount ... due and payable to a Subcontractor,
the State may then make that payment
directly to the Subcontractor ...
A further provision allows for
recovery of the amount from the head contractor.
(1) Do these provisions
illustrate the inept defence that the government has mounted when it claims
that payments to subcontractors working on government projects were ''a
very difficult situation to solve''?
(2) Why is the government treating
one project differently from other government projects?
(3) Will the
minister take immediate steps to implement similar arrangements in all current
and future contracts involving government projects; and, if not, why not?
475. Mr M. McGOWAN to the Minister for
Finance:
I refer to the security of payment
provisions on page 94 of ''The new Perth Stadium DBFM Project: Design,
Build, Finance and Maintain (DMFM) Project Agreement'', which states
that if —
... the State becomes aware that
Project Co has failed to pay an amount ... due and payable to a Subcontractor,
the State may then make that payment
directly to the Subcontractor ...
A further provision allows for
recovery of the amount from the head contractor.
(1) Do these provisions
illustrate the inept defence that the government has mounted when it claims
that payments to subcontractors working on government projects were ''a
very difficult situation to solve''?
(2) Why is the government treating
one project differently from other government projects?
(3) Will the
minister take immediate steps to implement similar arrangements in all current
and future contracts involving government projects; and, if not, why not?
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the Leader of the Opposition
for the question.
(1)–(3) As
he is aware, Building Management and Works handle contracts worth up to $100 million
and the Treasurer, through the Office of Strategic Projects, handles projects
worth over $100 million. That is why there is a bit of variation. As I said
before, Building Management and Works is looking at a new innovative project
bank account as a system of being able to look after payments to
subcontractors. That is what we are looking at doing as a solution.
for the question.
(1)–(3) As
he is aware, Building Management and Works handle contracts worth up to $100 million
and the Treasurer, through the Office of Strategic Projects, handles projects
worth over $100 million. That is why there is a bit of variation. As I said
before, Building Management and Works is looking at a new innovative project
bank account as a system of being able to look after payments to
subcontractors. That is what we are looking at doing as a solution.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.