A parliamentary question regarding the amendment to the Alumina Refinery (Wagerup) Agreement 1978, specifically concerning the increase in alumina production limits and the lack of public consultation or notification to local residents. The government confirms the production increase and admits to no consultation or notification.

AnsweredQoN 327Legislative Council
Asked
29 May 2007
Portfolio
State Development

QuestionView source ↗

ALUMINA REFINERY (WAGERUP) AGREEMENT 1978 - AMENDMENT
I refer to the amendment to the Alumina Refinery (Wagerup) Agreement 1978 dated 28 March 2007 and tabled in this house on 24 April 2007. (1) Does the amendment seek to lift the agreement’s limit on alumina production at Wagerup refinery from four million tonnes per annum to six million tonnes per annum? (2) What public consultation was undertaken before the government agreed to this amendment? (3) Were residents around the Wagerup refinery given notice of the amendment? (4) If so, when and how was notice given? Hon KATE DOUST

AnswerView source ↗

(1) Yes. (2) Nil. (3) No. (4) Not applicable.
(1) Does the amendment seek to lift the agreement’s limit on alumina production at Wagerup refinery from four million tonnes per annum to six million tonnes per annum? (2) What public consultation was undertaken before the government agreed to this amendment? (3) Were residents around the Wagerup refinery given notice of the amendment? (4) If so, when and how was notice given? Hon KATE DOUST replied: (1) Yes. (2) Nil. (3) No. (4) Not applicable.
(2) What public consultation was undertaken before the government agreed to this amendment? (3) Were residents around the Wagerup refinery given notice of the amendment? (4) If so, when and how was notice given? Hon KATE DOUST replied: (1) Yes. (2) Nil. (3) No. (4) Not applicable.
(3) Were residents around the Wagerup refinery given notice of the amendment? (4) If so, when and how was notice given? Hon KATE DOUST replied: (1) Yes. (2) Nil. (3) No. (4) Not applicable.
(4) If so, when and how was notice given? Hon KATE DOUST replied: (1) Yes. (2) Nil. (3) No. (4) Not applicable.
Hon KATE DOUST replied: (1) Yes. (2) Nil. (3) No. (4) Not applicable.
(1) Yes. (2) Nil. (3) No. (4) Not applicable.
(2) Nil. (3) No. (4) Not applicable.
(3) No. (4) Not applicable.
(4) Not applicable.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more