❓ A Western Australian parliamentary question on notice regarding the review of regional development commissions. The Minister had not yet received the review committee's report as of November 11, 2010, due to an approved extension.
AnsweredQoN 917Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONS — REVIEW
I refer to the review of regional development commissions. (1) Has the minister received the review committee’s report? (2) If yes to (1), when did the minister receive it; will the minister release the report to the public; and, when can the community expect an announcement on the government’s decision on the review? (3) If no to (1), why not, and when does the minister expect to receive the report? Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN
I refer to the review of regional development commissions. (1) Has the minister received the review committee’s report? (2) If yes to (1), when did the minister receive it; will the minister release the report to the public; and, when can the community expect an announcement on the government’s decision on the review? (3) If no to (1), why not, and when does the minister expect to receive the report? Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN
AnswerView source ↗
On behalf of the parliamentary secretary representing the Minister for Regional Development, I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) An extension was requested by the review committee and subsequently approved by the minister. The minister expects to receive the report by 30 November 2010.
(1) Has the minister received the review committee’s report? (2) If yes to (1), when did the minister receive it; will the minister release the report to the public; and, when can the community expect an announcement on the government’s decision on the review? (3) If no to (1), why not, and when does the minister expect to receive the report? Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN replied: On behalf of the parliamentary secretary representing the Minister for Regional Development, I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) An extension was requested by the review committee and subsequently approved by the minister. The minister expects to receive the report by 30 November 2010.
(2) If yes to (1), when did the minister receive it; will the minister release the report to the public; and, when can the community expect an announcement on the government’s decision on the review? (3) If no to (1), why not, and when does the minister expect to receive the report? Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN replied: On behalf of the parliamentary secretary representing the Minister for Regional Development, I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) An extension was requested by the review committee and subsequently approved by the minister. The minister expects to receive the report by 30 November 2010.
(3) If no to (1), why not, and when does the minister expect to receive the report? Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN replied: On behalf of the parliamentary secretary representing the Minister for Regional Development, I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) An extension was requested by the review committee and subsequently approved by the minister. The minister expects to receive the report by 30 November 2010.
Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN replied: On behalf of the parliamentary secretary representing the Minister for Regional Development, I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) An extension was requested by the review committee and subsequently approved by the minister. The minister expects to receive the report by 30 November 2010.
On behalf of the parliamentary secretary representing the Minister for Regional Development, I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) An extension was requested by the review committee and subsequently approved by the minister. The minister expects to receive the report by 30 November 2010.
(1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) An extension was requested by the review committee and subsequently approved by the minister. The minister expects to receive the report by 30 November 2010.
(2) Not applicable. (3) An extension was requested by the review committee and subsequently approved by the minister. The minister expects to receive the report by 30 November 2010.
(3) An extension was requested by the review committee and subsequently approved by the minister. The minister expects to receive the report by 30 November 2010.
(1) Has the minister received the review committee’s report? (2) If yes to (1), when did the minister receive it; will the minister release the report to the public; and, when can the community expect an announcement on the government’s decision on the review? (3) If no to (1), why not, and when does the minister expect to receive the report? Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN replied: On behalf of the parliamentary secretary representing the Minister for Regional Development, I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) An extension was requested by the review committee and subsequently approved by the minister. The minister expects to receive the report by 30 November 2010.
(2) If yes to (1), when did the minister receive it; will the minister release the report to the public; and, when can the community expect an announcement on the government’s decision on the review? (3) If no to (1), why not, and when does the minister expect to receive the report? Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN replied: On behalf of the parliamentary secretary representing the Minister for Regional Development, I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) An extension was requested by the review committee and subsequently approved by the minister. The minister expects to receive the report by 30 November 2010.
(3) If no to (1), why not, and when does the minister expect to receive the report? Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN replied: On behalf of the parliamentary secretary representing the Minister for Regional Development, I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) An extension was requested by the review committee and subsequently approved by the minister. The minister expects to receive the report by 30 November 2010.
Hon MICHAEL MISCHIN replied: On behalf of the parliamentary secretary representing the Minister for Regional Development, I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) An extension was requested by the review committee and subsequently approved by the minister. The minister expects to receive the report by 30 November 2010.
On behalf of the parliamentary secretary representing the Minister for Regional Development, I thank the member for some notice of the question. (1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) An extension was requested by the review committee and subsequently approved by the minister. The minister expects to receive the report by 30 November 2010.
(1) No. (2) Not applicable. (3) An extension was requested by the review committee and subsequently approved by the minister. The minister expects to receive the report by 30 November 2010.
(2) Not applicable. (3) An extension was requested by the review committee and subsequently approved by the minister. The minister expects to receive the report by 30 November 2010.
(3) An extension was requested by the review committee and subsequently approved by the minister. The minister expects to receive the report by 30 November 2010.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.