Hon Jim Scott questions the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure regarding documents related to Mr. Neil Winzer's public interest claim and the 1995 enterprise bargaining agreement. The Minister responds that the department does not hold the documents as described.

AnsweredQoN 199Legislative Council
Asked
6 April 2004
Portfolio
Planning and Infrastructure

QuestionView source ↗

In light of the minister’s response to question on notice 541 of May 2002, will the minister table documents that the Department for Planning and Infrastructure say exist but which Mr Neil Winzer says do not exist with regard to his public interest claim, which show that - (a) neither the staff of the department nor the public were advised of the abandonment of the 1995 enterprise bargaining agreement; and (b) no officer at any time addressed Mr Winzer’s public interest claim or the evidence he offered in support? Hon KEN TRAVERS

AnswerView source ↗

I thank the member for some notice of this question. (a) The department does not hold documents showing that neither department staff nor the public were ever advised of the abandonment of the 1995 EBA. As stated in the response of 2 March 2004 to the member’s question on notice 1530, the 1995 EBA was not abandoned. Hon Jim Scott: I didn’t say it was. The PRESIDENT: Order! The parliamentary secretary has the call. Hon KEN TRAVERS: The answer continues - (b) The department does not hold documents showing that no officer at any time addressed Mr Winzer’s public interest claim or the evidence he offered in support.
(a) neither the staff of the department nor the public were advised of the abandonment of the 1995 enterprise bargaining agreement; and (b) no officer at any time addressed Mr Winzer’s public interest claim or the evidence he offered in support? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (a) The department does not hold documents showing that neither department staff nor the public were ever advised of the abandonment of the 1995 EBA. As stated in the response of 2 March 2004 to the member’s question on notice 1530, the 1995 EBA was not abandoned. Hon Jim Scott: I didn’t say it was. The PRESIDENT: Order! The parliamentary secretary has the call. Hon KEN TRAVERS: The answer continues - (b) The department does not hold documents showing that no officer at any time addressed Mr Winzer’s public interest claim or the evidence he offered in support.
(b) no officer at any time addressed Mr Winzer’s public interest claim or the evidence he offered in support? Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (a) The department does not hold documents showing that neither department staff nor the public were ever advised of the abandonment of the 1995 EBA. As stated in the response of 2 March 2004 to the member’s question on notice 1530, the 1995 EBA was not abandoned. Hon Jim Scott: I didn’t say it was. The PRESIDENT: Order! The parliamentary secretary has the call. Hon KEN TRAVERS: The answer continues - (b) The department does not hold documents showing that no officer at any time addressed Mr Winzer’s public interest claim or the evidence he offered in support.
Hon KEN TRAVERS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (a) The department does not hold documents showing that neither department staff nor the public were ever advised of the abandonment of the 1995 EBA. As stated in the response of 2 March 2004 to the member’s question on notice 1530, the 1995 EBA was not abandoned. Hon Jim Scott: I didn’t say it was. The PRESIDENT: Order! The parliamentary secretary has the call. Hon KEN TRAVERS: The answer continues - (b) The department does not hold documents showing that no officer at any time addressed Mr Winzer’s public interest claim or the evidence he offered in support.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (a) The department does not hold documents showing that neither department staff nor the public were ever advised of the abandonment of the 1995 EBA. As stated in the response of 2 March 2004 to the member’s question on notice 1530, the 1995 EBA was not abandoned. Hon Jim Scott: I didn’t say it was. The PRESIDENT: Order! The parliamentary secretary has the call. Hon KEN TRAVERS: The answer continues - (b) The department does not hold documents showing that no officer at any time addressed Mr Winzer’s public interest claim or the evidence he offered in support.
(a) The department does not hold documents showing that neither department staff nor the public were ever advised of the abandonment of the 1995 EBA. As stated in the response of 2 March 2004 to the member’s question on notice 1530, the 1995 EBA was not abandoned. Hon Jim Scott: I didn’t say it was. The PRESIDENT: Order! The parliamentary secretary has the call. Hon KEN TRAVERS: The answer continues - (b) The department does not hold documents showing that no officer at any time addressed Mr Winzer’s public interest claim or the evidence he offered in support.
Hon Jim Scott: I didn’t say it was. The PRESIDENT: Order! The parliamentary secretary has the call. Hon KEN TRAVERS: The answer continues - (b) The department does not hold documents showing that no officer at any time addressed Mr Winzer’s public interest claim or the evidence he offered in support.
The PRESIDENT: Order! The parliamentary secretary has the call. Hon KEN TRAVERS: The answer continues - (b) The department does not hold documents showing that no officer at any time addressed Mr Winzer’s public interest claim or the evidence he offered in support.
Hon KEN TRAVERS: The answer continues - (b) The department does not hold documents showing that no officer at any time addressed Mr Winzer’s public interest claim or the evidence he offered in support.
(b) The department does not hold documents showing that no officer at any time addressed Mr Winzer’s public interest claim or the evidence he offered in support.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more