❓ Question regarding the validity of environmental reports used to classify the Greenpatch area in Dalyellup, and potential implications for future development given possible reclassification of a lot as contaminated.
⏳ Awaiting AnswerQoN 1734Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to tabled reports on 15 October 2018, GHD January 2018 and the Preliminary Site Investigation, Lots 8019, 9105 and 9067 Dalyellup, Greenpatch Development , RPS, November 2016, which were used to classify the Greenpatch as "report not substantiated". Given that the lot or part of lot 9105 is undergoing reclassification and could potentially be amended to contaminated, "remediated for restricted use", I ask: (a) will these reports be discounted for the classification of the Greenpatch Lots 8019, 9105 and 9067; (b) if no to (a), why not; (c) if yes to (a), will the Minister advise the Western Australian Planning Commission to reject development of the Greenpatch; and (d) if no to (c), why not?
AnswerView source ↗
⏳
This question is awaiting a response from the Minister.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.