❓ Hon Giz Watson asks the Minister for State Development about the dates and nominators of awards given to the Burrup Peninsula Land Use Plan and Management Strategy. The Minister provides the dates and indicates the nominator is difficult to ascertain but likely related to the Burrup Peninsula Advisory Board.
AnsweredQoN 3929Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
With reference to the citation for excellence in planning from the national body of the Royal Australian Planning Institute, plus a special commendation for industrial planning from the Western Australian Division of that institute for the Burrup Peninsula Land Use Plan and Management Strategy in the mid-1990s, I ask -
(1) Can the Minister identify on what date the excellence citation was given?
(2) If no to (1), why not?
(3) Can the Minister identify on what date the special commendation was given?
(4) If no to (3), why not?
(5) Will the Minister table or provide me with copies of the excellence citation and the special commendation?
(6) Will the Minister advise who nominated the Burrup Peninsula Land Use Plan and Management Strategy for these awards?
(1) Can the Minister identify on what date the excellence citation was given?
(2) If no to (1), why not?
(3) Can the Minister identify on what date the special commendation was given?
(4) If no to (3), why not?
(5) Will the Minister table or provide me with copies of the excellence citation and the special commendation?
(6) Will the Minister advise who nominated the Burrup Peninsula Land Use Plan and Management Strategy for these awards?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
19 September 2006
Responded by
Leader of the House representing the Minister for State Development
Response time
28 days
(1) July 1998. (2) Not applicable. (3) 5 December 1997. (4) Not applicable. (5) Yes [see tabled Paper No. ]. (6) We have not been able to determine from the records precisely which individual nominated the plan but corporate knowledge suggests it was those associated with the Burrup Peninsula Advisory Board at the suggestion of the Planning Consultant. The nomination was judged on its merit and awarded a National Royal Planning Institute Certificate of Merit for Planning and Development.
(2) Not applicable. (3) 5 December 1997. (4) Not applicable. (5) Yes [see tabled Paper No. ]. (6) We have not been able to determine from the records precisely which individual nominated the plan but corporate knowledge suggests it was those associated with the Burrup Peninsula Advisory Board at the suggestion of the Planning Consultant. The nomination was judged on its merit and awarded a National Royal Planning Institute Certificate of Merit for Planning and Development.
(3) 5 December 1997. (4) Not applicable. (5) Yes [see tabled Paper No. ]. (6) We have not been able to determine from the records precisely which individual nominated the plan but corporate knowledge suggests it was those associated with the Burrup Peninsula Advisory Board at the suggestion of the Planning Consultant. The nomination was judged on its merit and awarded a National Royal Planning Institute Certificate of Merit for Planning and Development.
(4) Not applicable. (5) Yes [see tabled Paper No. ]. (6) We have not been able to determine from the records precisely which individual nominated the plan but corporate knowledge suggests it was those associated with the Burrup Peninsula Advisory Board at the suggestion of the Planning Consultant. The nomination was judged on its merit and awarded a National Royal Planning Institute Certificate of Merit for Planning and Development.
(5) Yes [see tabled Paper No. ]. (6) We have not been able to determine from the records precisely which individual nominated the plan but corporate knowledge suggests it was those associated with the Burrup Peninsula Advisory Board at the suggestion of the Planning Consultant. The nomination was judged on its merit and awarded a National Royal Planning Institute Certificate of Merit for Planning and Development.
(6) We have not been able to determine from the records precisely which individual nominated the plan but corporate knowledge suggests it was those associated with the Burrup Peninsula Advisory Board at the suggestion of the Planning Consultant. The nomination was judged on its merit and awarded a National Royal Planning Institute Certificate of Merit for Planning and Development.
(2) Not applicable. (3) 5 December 1997. (4) Not applicable. (5) Yes [see tabled Paper No. ]. (6) We have not been able to determine from the records precisely which individual nominated the plan but corporate knowledge suggests it was those associated with the Burrup Peninsula Advisory Board at the suggestion of the Planning Consultant. The nomination was judged on its merit and awarded a National Royal Planning Institute Certificate of Merit for Planning and Development.
(3) 5 December 1997. (4) Not applicable. (5) Yes [see tabled Paper No. ]. (6) We have not been able to determine from the records precisely which individual nominated the plan but corporate knowledge suggests it was those associated with the Burrup Peninsula Advisory Board at the suggestion of the Planning Consultant. The nomination was judged on its merit and awarded a National Royal Planning Institute Certificate of Merit for Planning and Development.
(4) Not applicable. (5) Yes [see tabled Paper No. ]. (6) We have not been able to determine from the records precisely which individual nominated the plan but corporate knowledge suggests it was those associated with the Burrup Peninsula Advisory Board at the suggestion of the Planning Consultant. The nomination was judged on its merit and awarded a National Royal Planning Institute Certificate of Merit for Planning and Development.
(5) Yes [see tabled Paper No. ]. (6) We have not been able to determine from the records precisely which individual nominated the plan but corporate knowledge suggests it was those associated with the Burrup Peninsula Advisory Board at the suggestion of the Planning Consultant. The nomination was judged on its merit and awarded a National Royal Planning Institute Certificate of Merit for Planning and Development.
(6) We have not been able to determine from the records precisely which individual nominated the plan but corporate knowledge suggests it was those associated with the Burrup Peninsula Advisory Board at the suggestion of the Planning Consultant. The nomination was judged on its merit and awarded a National Royal Planning Institute Certificate of Merit for Planning and Development.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.