Hon Nigel Hallett asks about the status of a Building Disputes Tribunal order from 2005 involving Tangent Nominees and Mr. Willis. The Parliamentary Secretary replies that the original order was set aside and a hearing is scheduled.

AnsweredQoN 763Legislative Council
Asked
18 September 2007
Portfolio
Consumer Protection

QuestionView source ↗

BUILDING DISPUTES TRIBUNAL - ORDER TO REMEDY 763. Hon NIGEL HALLETT to the parliamentary secretary representing the Minister for Consumer Protection: I refer to order to remedy 254/2004-05 issued by the Building Disputes Tribunal on 21 January 2005 in relation to a dispute between Tangent Nominees and Mr Willis, complaint 0.4920. (1) Has the action required of the builder through the issue of this order been completed? (2) If not, what action has been undertaken by the tribunal to force the builder to comply? (3) What is the current status of the dispute and order to remedy? Hon ADELE FARINA

AnswerView source ↗

I thank the member for some notice of this question. The minister has provided the following answer - (1) No. (2) On 12 June 2006 the tribunal ordered that order to remedy No 254/2004-05, dated 21 January 2005, is set aside on the basis that the complainant may seek an order to pay in lieu thereof. On 23 April 2007, Mr Willis provided the tribunal with updated quotations as directed. Since that date, tribunal staff have liaised with both parties to schedule a suitable date for the hearing. (3) A hearing before the building disputes tribunal has been scheduled for 17, 18 and 19 October 2007 in Busselton.
BUILDING DISPUTES TRIBUNAL - ORDER TO REMEDY
I refer to order to remedy 254/2004-05 issued by the Building Disputes Tribunal on 21 January 2005 in relation to a dispute between Tangent Nominees and Mr Willis, complaint 0.4920. (1) Has the action required of the builder through the issue of this order been completed? (2) If not, what action has been undertaken by the tribunal to force the builder to comply? (3) What is the current status of the dispute and order to remedy? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. The minister has provided the following answer - (1) No. (2) On 12 June 2006 the tribunal ordered that order to remedy No 254/2004-05, dated 21 January 2005, is set aside on the basis that the complainant may seek an order to pay in lieu thereof. On 23 April 2007, Mr Willis provided the tribunal with updated quotations as directed. Since that date, tribunal staff have liaised with both parties to schedule a suitable date for the hearing. (3) A hearing before the building disputes tribunal has been scheduled for 17, 18 and 19 October 2007 in Busselton.
(1) Has the action required of the builder through the issue of this order been completed? (2) If not, what action has been undertaken by the tribunal to force the builder to comply? (3) What is the current status of the dispute and order to remedy? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. The minister has provided the following answer - (1) No. (2) On 12 June 2006 the tribunal ordered that order to remedy No 254/2004-05, dated 21 January 2005, is set aside on the basis that the complainant may seek an order to pay in lieu thereof. On 23 April 2007, Mr Willis provided the tribunal with updated quotations as directed. Since that date, tribunal staff have liaised with both parties to schedule a suitable date for the hearing. (3) A hearing before the building disputes tribunal has been scheduled for 17, 18 and 19 October 2007 in Busselton.
(2) If not, what action has been undertaken by the tribunal to force the builder to comply? (3) What is the current status of the dispute and order to remedy? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. The minister has provided the following answer - (1) No. (2) On 12 June 2006 the tribunal ordered that order to remedy No 254/2004-05, dated 21 January 2005, is set aside on the basis that the complainant may seek an order to pay in lieu thereof. On 23 April 2007, Mr Willis provided the tribunal with updated quotations as directed. Since that date, tribunal staff have liaised with both parties to schedule a suitable date for the hearing. (3) A hearing before the building disputes tribunal has been scheduled for 17, 18 and 19 October 2007 in Busselton.
(3) What is the current status of the dispute and order to remedy? Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. The minister has provided the following answer - (1) No. (2) On 12 June 2006 the tribunal ordered that order to remedy No 254/2004-05, dated 21 January 2005, is set aside on the basis that the complainant may seek an order to pay in lieu thereof. On 23 April 2007, Mr Willis provided the tribunal with updated quotations as directed. Since that date, tribunal staff have liaised with both parties to schedule a suitable date for the hearing. (3) A hearing before the building disputes tribunal has been scheduled for 17, 18 and 19 October 2007 in Busselton.
Hon ADELE FARINA replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. The minister has provided the following answer - (1) No. (2) On 12 June 2006 the tribunal ordered that order to remedy No 254/2004-05, dated 21 January 2005, is set aside on the basis that the complainant may seek an order to pay in lieu thereof. On 23 April 2007, Mr Willis provided the tribunal with updated quotations as directed. Since that date, tribunal staff have liaised with both parties to schedule a suitable date for the hearing. (3) A hearing before the building disputes tribunal has been scheduled for 17, 18 and 19 October 2007 in Busselton.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. The minister has provided the following answer - (1) No. (2) On 12 June 2006 the tribunal ordered that order to remedy No 254/2004-05, dated 21 January 2005, is set aside on the basis that the complainant may seek an order to pay in lieu thereof. On 23 April 2007, Mr Willis provided the tribunal with updated quotations as directed. Since that date, tribunal staff have liaised with both parties to schedule a suitable date for the hearing. (3) A hearing before the building disputes tribunal has been scheduled for 17, 18 and 19 October 2007 in Busselton.
(1) No. (2) On 12 June 2006 the tribunal ordered that order to remedy No 254/2004-05, dated 21 January 2005, is set aside on the basis that the complainant may seek an order to pay in lieu thereof. On 23 April 2007, Mr Willis provided the tribunal with updated quotations as directed. Since that date, tribunal staff have liaised with both parties to schedule a suitable date for the hearing. (3) A hearing before the building disputes tribunal has been scheduled for 17, 18 and 19 October 2007 in Busselton.
(2) On 12 June 2006 the tribunal ordered that order to remedy No 254/2004-05, dated 21 January 2005, is set aside on the basis that the complainant may seek an order to pay in lieu thereof. On 23 April 2007, Mr Willis provided the tribunal with updated quotations as directed. Since that date, tribunal staff have liaised with both parties to schedule a suitable date for the hearing. (3) A hearing before the building disputes tribunal has been scheduled for 17, 18 and 19 October 2007 in Busselton.
(3) A hearing before the building disputes tribunal has been scheduled for 17, 18 and 19 October 2007 in Busselton.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more