❓ A parliamentary question seeks details on Woodside's permits, land occupation, and negotiations with native title claimants for its James Price Point project. The Minister provides some information but defers some questions to Woodside directly.
AnsweredQoN 1024Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
WOODSIDE — JAMES PRICE POINT
I refer to the Woodside program of works at James Price Point. (1) What permits, approvals and licences does Woodside require to undertake its current program of work at James Price Point? (2) Has Woodside received permission under section 91 of the Land Administration Act to undertake its current program of work at James Price Point? (3) Who is the occupier of the land at James Price Point where the works are to be conducted? (4) Is there a requirement for Woodside to negotiate with native title claimants or the occupier of any proposed works at James Price Point? (5) Has Woodside negotiated with native title claimants or occupiers over permission to carry out past, current and future works at James Price Point? (6) If yes to (5), who have they negotiated with, and was permission granted? Hon NORMAN MOORE
I refer to the Woodside program of works at James Price Point. (1) What permits, approvals and licences does Woodside require to undertake its current program of work at James Price Point? (2) Has Woodside received permission under section 91 of the Land Administration Act to undertake its current program of work at James Price Point? (3) Who is the occupier of the land at James Price Point where the works are to be conducted? (4) Is there a requirement for Woodside to negotiate with native title claimants or the occupier of any proposed works at James Price Point? (5) Has Woodside negotiated with native title claimants or occupiers over permission to carry out past, current and future works at James Price Point? (6) If yes to (5), who have they negotiated with, and was permission granted? Hon NORMAN MOORE
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)–(2) Woodside is undertaking a range of environmental and geotechnical studies relating to the proposed Browse LNG precinct at James Price Point. Appropriate approvals and management plans are in place where required. (3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(1) What permits, approvals and licences does Woodside require to undertake its current program of work at James Price Point? (2) Has Woodside received permission under section 91 of the Land Administration Act to undertake its current program of work at James Price Point? (3) Who is the occupier of the land at James Price Point where the works are to be conducted? (4) Is there a requirement for Woodside to negotiate with native title claimants or the occupier of any proposed works at James Price Point? (5) Has Woodside negotiated with native title claimants or occupiers over permission to carry out past, current and future works at James Price Point? (6) If yes to (5), who have they negotiated with, and was permission granted? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)–(2) Woodside is undertaking a range of environmental and geotechnical studies relating to the proposed Browse LNG precinct at James Price Point. Appropriate approvals and management plans are in place where required. (3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(2) Has Woodside received permission under section 91 of the Land Administration Act to undertake its current program of work at James Price Point? (3) Who is the occupier of the land at James Price Point where the works are to be conducted? (4) Is there a requirement for Woodside to negotiate with native title claimants or the occupier of any proposed works at James Price Point? (5) Has Woodside negotiated with native title claimants or occupiers over permission to carry out past, current and future works at James Price Point? (6) If yes to (5), who have they negotiated with, and was permission granted? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)–(2) Woodside is undertaking a range of environmental and geotechnical studies relating to the proposed Browse LNG precinct at James Price Point. Appropriate approvals and management plans are in place where required. (3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(3) Who is the occupier of the land at James Price Point where the works are to be conducted? (4) Is there a requirement for Woodside to negotiate with native title claimants or the occupier of any proposed works at James Price Point? (5) Has Woodside negotiated with native title claimants or occupiers over permission to carry out past, current and future works at James Price Point? (6) If yes to (5), who have they negotiated with, and was permission granted? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)–(2) Woodside is undertaking a range of environmental and geotechnical studies relating to the proposed Browse LNG precinct at James Price Point. Appropriate approvals and management plans are in place where required. (3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(4) Is there a requirement for Woodside to negotiate with native title claimants or the occupier of any proposed works at James Price Point? (5) Has Woodside negotiated with native title claimants or occupiers over permission to carry out past, current and future works at James Price Point? (6) If yes to (5), who have they negotiated with, and was permission granted? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)–(2) Woodside is undertaking a range of environmental and geotechnical studies relating to the proposed Browse LNG precinct at James Price Point. Appropriate approvals and management plans are in place where required. (3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(5) Has Woodside negotiated with native title claimants or occupiers over permission to carry out past, current and future works at James Price Point? (6) If yes to (5), who have they negotiated with, and was permission granted? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)–(2) Woodside is undertaking a range of environmental and geotechnical studies relating to the proposed Browse LNG precinct at James Price Point. Appropriate approvals and management plans are in place where required. (3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(6) If yes to (5), who have they negotiated with, and was permission granted? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)–(2) Woodside is undertaking a range of environmental and geotechnical studies relating to the proposed Browse LNG precinct at James Price Point. Appropriate approvals and management plans are in place where required. (3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)–(2) Woodside is undertaking a range of environmental and geotechnical studies relating to the proposed Browse LNG precinct at James Price Point. Appropriate approvals and management plans are in place where required. (3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)–(2) Woodside is undertaking a range of environmental and geotechnical studies relating to the proposed Browse LNG precinct at James Price Point. Appropriate approvals and management plans are in place where required. (3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(1)–(2) Woodside is undertaking a range of environmental and geotechnical studies relating to the proposed Browse LNG precinct at James Price Point. Appropriate approvals and management plans are in place where required. (3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(1) What permits, approvals and licences does Woodside require to undertake its current program of work at James Price Point? (2) Has Woodside received permission under section 91 of the Land Administration Act to undertake its current program of work at James Price Point? (3) Who is the occupier of the land at James Price Point where the works are to be conducted? (4) Is there a requirement for Woodside to negotiate with native title claimants or the occupier of any proposed works at James Price Point? (5) Has Woodside negotiated with native title claimants or occupiers over permission to carry out past, current and future works at James Price Point? (6) If yes to (5), who have they negotiated with, and was permission granted? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)–(2) Woodside is undertaking a range of environmental and geotechnical studies relating to the proposed Browse LNG precinct at James Price Point. Appropriate approvals and management plans are in place where required. (3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(2) Has Woodside received permission under section 91 of the Land Administration Act to undertake its current program of work at James Price Point? (3) Who is the occupier of the land at James Price Point where the works are to be conducted? (4) Is there a requirement for Woodside to negotiate with native title claimants or the occupier of any proposed works at James Price Point? (5) Has Woodside negotiated with native title claimants or occupiers over permission to carry out past, current and future works at James Price Point? (6) If yes to (5), who have they negotiated with, and was permission granted? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)–(2) Woodside is undertaking a range of environmental and geotechnical studies relating to the proposed Browse LNG precinct at James Price Point. Appropriate approvals and management plans are in place where required. (3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(3) Who is the occupier of the land at James Price Point where the works are to be conducted? (4) Is there a requirement for Woodside to negotiate with native title claimants or the occupier of any proposed works at James Price Point? (5) Has Woodside negotiated with native title claimants or occupiers over permission to carry out past, current and future works at James Price Point? (6) If yes to (5), who have they negotiated with, and was permission granted? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)–(2) Woodside is undertaking a range of environmental and geotechnical studies relating to the proposed Browse LNG precinct at James Price Point. Appropriate approvals and management plans are in place where required. (3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(4) Is there a requirement for Woodside to negotiate with native title claimants or the occupier of any proposed works at James Price Point? (5) Has Woodside negotiated with native title claimants or occupiers over permission to carry out past, current and future works at James Price Point? (6) If yes to (5), who have they negotiated with, and was permission granted? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)–(2) Woodside is undertaking a range of environmental and geotechnical studies relating to the proposed Browse LNG precinct at James Price Point. Appropriate approvals and management plans are in place where required. (3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(5) Has Woodside negotiated with native title claimants or occupiers over permission to carry out past, current and future works at James Price Point? (6) If yes to (5), who have they negotiated with, and was permission granted? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)–(2) Woodside is undertaking a range of environmental and geotechnical studies relating to the proposed Browse LNG precinct at James Price Point. Appropriate approvals and management plans are in place where required. (3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(6) If yes to (5), who have they negotiated with, and was permission granted? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)–(2) Woodside is undertaking a range of environmental and geotechnical studies relating to the proposed Browse LNG precinct at James Price Point. Appropriate approvals and management plans are in place where required. (3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)–(2) Woodside is undertaking a range of environmental and geotechnical studies relating to the proposed Browse LNG precinct at James Price Point. Appropriate approvals and management plans are in place where required. (3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1)–(2) Woodside is undertaking a range of environmental and geotechnical studies relating to the proposed Browse LNG precinct at James Price Point. Appropriate approvals and management plans are in place where required. (3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(1)–(2) Woodside is undertaking a range of environmental and geotechnical studies relating to the proposed Browse LNG precinct at James Price Point. Appropriate approvals and management plans are in place where required. (3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(3) The land is unallocated crown land. (4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(4) Parties are required to meet the terms of a heritage protection agreement between the Kimberley Land Council, the state and Woodside Energy Ltd. (5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
(5)–(6) These are matters that should be raised with Woodside Energy Ltd directly.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.