❓ A parliamentary question regarding thefts and losses of government property (laptops, mobile phones, etc.) within various WA government departments and agencies, including reporting practices to the police and outcomes of reported incidents.
AnsweredQoN 2295Legislative Assembly
Asked
27 November 2003
Member
Portfolio
Attorney General; Minister for Health; Electoral Affairs
QuestionView source ↗
(b) when were they reported; (c) of those reported, what has been the outcome; and (d) if any were not reported to the police, why not?
(c) of those reported, what has been the outcome; and (d) if any were not reported to the police, why not?
(d) if any were not reported to the police, why not?
(a) – (d) Not applicable DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (a) All thefts of laptop computers, notebooks and palm computers were reported to the Police. Mobile phone thefts have been reported to Police with the exception of two areas. Unless it is part of a larger loss, South Metropolitan Health Service and North Metropolitan Health Service do not report the loss or theft of a mobile phone to the Police unless it is associated with the loss or theft of other items of value, for example car theft. (b) When discovered stolen. (c) One laptop was recovered when the person presented it to Cash Converters. The laptop was identified as government property, the Police were involved, the laptop was recovered and the employee was dismissed. One laptop and five palm devices were recovered by Police. A former staff member faces criminal charges for stealing. No other items have been recovered. (d) Some mobile phone thefts or losses are not reported where the monetary value is low or they are below the insurance excess limit; except in circumstances where the theft is associated with the theft of other items of value, for example car theft. Phones that are lost are not reported to the Police. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (a) One has been reported to the police. One is being investigated to determine if it was lost or stolen; (b) the same day the theft occurred; (c) no outcome from police, DPP reimbursed through insurance; (d) it has not yet been determined if a theft occurred. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (a) All thefts of laptop computers, notebooks and palm computers were reported to the Police. Mobile phone thefts have been reported to Police with the exception of two areas. Unless it is part of a larger loss, South Metropolitan Health Service and North Metropolitan Health Service do not report the loss or theft of a mobile phone to the Police unless it is associated with the loss or theft of other items of value, for example car theft. (b) When discovered stolen. (c) One laptop was recovered when the person presented it to Cash Converters. The laptop was identified as government property, the Police were involved, the laptop was recovered and the employee was dismissed. One laptop and five palm devices were recovered by Police. A former staff member faces criminal charges for stealing. No other items have been recovered. (d) Some mobile phone thefts or losses are not reported where the monetary value is low or they are below the insurance excess limit; except in circumstances where the theft is associated with the theft of other items of value, for example car theft. Phones that are lost are not reported to the Police. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (a) One has been reported to the police. One is being investigated to determine if it was lost or stolen; (b) the same day the theft occurred; (c) no outcome from police, DPP reimbursed through insurance; (d) it has not yet been determined if a theft occurred. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
(a) All thefts of laptop computers, notebooks and palm computers were reported to the Police. Mobile phone thefts have been reported to Police with the exception of two areas. Unless it is part of a larger loss, South Metropolitan Health Service and North Metropolitan Health Service do not report the loss or theft of a mobile phone to the Police unless it is associated with the loss or theft of other items of value, for example car theft. (b) When discovered stolen. (c) One laptop was recovered when the person presented it to Cash Converters. The laptop was identified as government property, the Police were involved, the laptop was recovered and the employee was dismissed. One laptop and five palm devices were recovered by Police. A former staff member faces criminal charges for stealing. No other items have been recovered. (d) Some mobile phone thefts or losses are not reported where the monetary value is low or they are below the insurance excess limit; except in circumstances where the theft is associated with the theft of other items of value, for example car theft. Phones that are lost are not reported to the Police. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (a) One has been reported to the police. One is being investigated to determine if it was lost or stolen; (b) the same day the theft occurred; (c) no outcome from police, DPP reimbursed through insurance; (d) it has not yet been determined if a theft occurred. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
(b) When discovered stolen. (c) One laptop was recovered when the person presented it to Cash Converters. The laptop was identified as government property, the Police were involved, the laptop was recovered and the employee was dismissed. One laptop and five palm devices were recovered by Police. A former staff member faces criminal charges for stealing. No other items have been recovered. (d) Some mobile phone thefts or losses are not reported where the monetary value is low or they are below the insurance excess limit; except in circumstances where the theft is associated with the theft of other items of value, for example car theft. Phones that are lost are not reported to the Police. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (a) One has been reported to the police. One is being investigated to determine if it was lost or stolen; (b) the same day the theft occurred; (c) no outcome from police, DPP reimbursed through insurance; (d) it has not yet been determined if a theft occurred. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
(c) One laptop was recovered when the person presented it to Cash Converters. The laptop was identified as government property, the Police were involved, the laptop was recovered and the employee was dismissed. One laptop and five palm devices were recovered by Police. A former staff member faces criminal charges for stealing. No other items have been recovered. (d) Some mobile phone thefts or losses are not reported where the monetary value is low or they are below the insurance excess limit; except in circumstances where the theft is associated with the theft of other items of value, for example car theft. Phones that are lost are not reported to the Police. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (a) One has been reported to the police. One is being investigated to determine if it was lost or stolen; (b) the same day the theft occurred; (c) no outcome from police, DPP reimbursed through insurance; (d) it has not yet been determined if a theft occurred. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
(d) Some mobile phone thefts or losses are not reported where the monetary value is low or they are below the insurance excess limit; except in circumstances where the theft is associated with the theft of other items of value, for example car theft. Phones that are lost are not reported to the Police. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (a) One has been reported to the police. One is being investigated to determine if it was lost or stolen; (b) the same day the theft occurred; (c) no outcome from police, DPP reimbursed through insurance; (d) it has not yet been determined if a theft occurred. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (a) One has been reported to the police. One is being investigated to determine if it was lost or stolen; (b) the same day the theft occurred; (c) no outcome from police, DPP reimbursed through insurance; (d) it has not yet been determined if a theft occurred. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
(a) One has been reported to the police. One is being investigated to determine if it was lost or stolen; (b) the same day the theft occurred; (c) no outcome from police, DPP reimbursed through insurance; (d) it has not yet been determined if a theft occurred. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
(a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
(a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
(a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
(a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
(c) of those reported, what has been the outcome; and (d) if any were not reported to the police, why not?
(d) if any were not reported to the police, why not?
(a) – (d) Not applicable DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (a) All thefts of laptop computers, notebooks and palm computers were reported to the Police. Mobile phone thefts have been reported to Police with the exception of two areas. Unless it is part of a larger loss, South Metropolitan Health Service and North Metropolitan Health Service do not report the loss or theft of a mobile phone to the Police unless it is associated with the loss or theft of other items of value, for example car theft. (b) When discovered stolen. (c) One laptop was recovered when the person presented it to Cash Converters. The laptop was identified as government property, the Police were involved, the laptop was recovered and the employee was dismissed. One laptop and five palm devices were recovered by Police. A former staff member faces criminal charges for stealing. No other items have been recovered. (d) Some mobile phone thefts or losses are not reported where the monetary value is low or they are below the insurance excess limit; except in circumstances where the theft is associated with the theft of other items of value, for example car theft. Phones that are lost are not reported to the Police. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (a) One has been reported to the police. One is being investigated to determine if it was lost or stolen; (b) the same day the theft occurred; (c) no outcome from police, DPP reimbursed through insurance; (d) it has not yet been determined if a theft occurred. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (a) All thefts of laptop computers, notebooks and palm computers were reported to the Police. Mobile phone thefts have been reported to Police with the exception of two areas. Unless it is part of a larger loss, South Metropolitan Health Service and North Metropolitan Health Service do not report the loss or theft of a mobile phone to the Police unless it is associated with the loss or theft of other items of value, for example car theft. (b) When discovered stolen. (c) One laptop was recovered when the person presented it to Cash Converters. The laptop was identified as government property, the Police were involved, the laptop was recovered and the employee was dismissed. One laptop and five palm devices were recovered by Police. A former staff member faces criminal charges for stealing. No other items have been recovered. (d) Some mobile phone thefts or losses are not reported where the monetary value is low or they are below the insurance excess limit; except in circumstances where the theft is associated with the theft of other items of value, for example car theft. Phones that are lost are not reported to the Police. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (a) One has been reported to the police. One is being investigated to determine if it was lost or stolen; (b) the same day the theft occurred; (c) no outcome from police, DPP reimbursed through insurance; (d) it has not yet been determined if a theft occurred. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
(a) All thefts of laptop computers, notebooks and palm computers were reported to the Police. Mobile phone thefts have been reported to Police with the exception of two areas. Unless it is part of a larger loss, South Metropolitan Health Service and North Metropolitan Health Service do not report the loss or theft of a mobile phone to the Police unless it is associated with the loss or theft of other items of value, for example car theft. (b) When discovered stolen. (c) One laptop was recovered when the person presented it to Cash Converters. The laptop was identified as government property, the Police were involved, the laptop was recovered and the employee was dismissed. One laptop and five palm devices were recovered by Police. A former staff member faces criminal charges for stealing. No other items have been recovered. (d) Some mobile phone thefts or losses are not reported where the monetary value is low or they are below the insurance excess limit; except in circumstances where the theft is associated with the theft of other items of value, for example car theft. Phones that are lost are not reported to the Police. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (a) One has been reported to the police. One is being investigated to determine if it was lost or stolen; (b) the same day the theft occurred; (c) no outcome from police, DPP reimbursed through insurance; (d) it has not yet been determined if a theft occurred. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
(b) When discovered stolen. (c) One laptop was recovered when the person presented it to Cash Converters. The laptop was identified as government property, the Police were involved, the laptop was recovered and the employee was dismissed. One laptop and five palm devices were recovered by Police. A former staff member faces criminal charges for stealing. No other items have been recovered. (d) Some mobile phone thefts or losses are not reported where the monetary value is low or they are below the insurance excess limit; except in circumstances where the theft is associated with the theft of other items of value, for example car theft. Phones that are lost are not reported to the Police. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (a) One has been reported to the police. One is being investigated to determine if it was lost or stolen; (b) the same day the theft occurred; (c) no outcome from police, DPP reimbursed through insurance; (d) it has not yet been determined if a theft occurred. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
(c) One laptop was recovered when the person presented it to Cash Converters. The laptop was identified as government property, the Police were involved, the laptop was recovered and the employee was dismissed. One laptop and five palm devices were recovered by Police. A former staff member faces criminal charges for stealing. No other items have been recovered. (d) Some mobile phone thefts or losses are not reported where the monetary value is low or they are below the insurance excess limit; except in circumstances where the theft is associated with the theft of other items of value, for example car theft. Phones that are lost are not reported to the Police. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (a) One has been reported to the police. One is being investigated to determine if it was lost or stolen; (b) the same day the theft occurred; (c) no outcome from police, DPP reimbursed through insurance; (d) it has not yet been determined if a theft occurred. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
(d) Some mobile phone thefts or losses are not reported where the monetary value is low or they are below the insurance excess limit; except in circumstances where the theft is associated with the theft of other items of value, for example car theft. Phones that are lost are not reported to the Police. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (a) One has been reported to the police. One is being investigated to determine if it was lost or stolen; (b) the same day the theft occurred; (c) no outcome from police, DPP reimbursed through insurance; (d) it has not yet been determined if a theft occurred. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (a) One has been reported to the police. One is being investigated to determine if it was lost or stolen; (b) the same day the theft occurred; (c) no outcome from police, DPP reimbursed through insurance; (d) it has not yet been determined if a theft occurred. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
(a) One has been reported to the police. One is being investigated to determine if it was lost or stolen; (b) the same day the theft occurred; (c) no outcome from police, DPP reimbursed through insurance; (d) it has not yet been determined if a theft occurred. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police. b) Not applicable c) Not applicable d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value. LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
LEGAL AID WA (a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
(a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police . (b) December 2002. (c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items. (d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight. OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER (a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
(a) – (d) Not applicable OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW (a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
(a) – (d) Not applicable W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION (a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
(a) 1 (b) April 2001 (c) No outcome (d) Not applicable.
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
4 December 2003
Response time
7 days
CROWN SOLICITOR’S OFFICE
(a) – (d) Not applicable
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
(a) All thefts of laptop computers, notebooks and palm computers were reported to the Police. Mobile phone thefts have been reported to Police with the exception of two areas. Unless it is part of a larger loss, South Metropolitan Health Service and North Metropolitan Health Service do not report the loss or theft of a mobile phone to the Police unless it is associated with the loss or theft of other items of value, for example car theft.
(b) When discovered stolen.
(c) One laptop was recovered when the person presented it to Cash Converters. The laptop was identified as government property, the Police were involved, the laptop was recovered and the employee was dismissed.
One laptop and five palm devices were recovered by Police. A former staff member faces criminal charges for stealing.
No other items have been recovered.
(d) Some mobile phone thefts or losses are not reported where the monetary value is low or they are below the insurance excess limit; except in circumstances where the theft is associated with the theft of other items of value, for example car theft.
Phones that are lost are not reported to the Police.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
(a) One has been reported to the police.
One is being investigated to determine if it was lost or stolen;
(b) the same day the theft occurred;
(c) no outcome from police, DPP reimbursed through insurance;
(d) it has not yet been determined if a theft occurred.
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police.
b) Not applicable
c) Not applicable
d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value.
LEGAL AID WA
(a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police .
(b) December 2002.
(c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items.
(d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight.
OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
(a) – (d) Not applicable
OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW
(a) – (d) Not applicable
W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION
(a) 1
(b) April 2001
(c) No outcome
(d) Not applicable.
(a) – (d) Not applicable
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
(a) All thefts of laptop computers, notebooks and palm computers were reported to the Police. Mobile phone thefts have been reported to Police with the exception of two areas. Unless it is part of a larger loss, South Metropolitan Health Service and North Metropolitan Health Service do not report the loss or theft of a mobile phone to the Police unless it is associated with the loss or theft of other items of value, for example car theft.
(b) When discovered stolen.
(c) One laptop was recovered when the person presented it to Cash Converters. The laptop was identified as government property, the Police were involved, the laptop was recovered and the employee was dismissed.
One laptop and five palm devices were recovered by Police. A former staff member faces criminal charges for stealing.
No other items have been recovered.
(d) Some mobile phone thefts or losses are not reported where the monetary value is low or they are below the insurance excess limit; except in circumstances where the theft is associated with the theft of other items of value, for example car theft.
Phones that are lost are not reported to the Police.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
(a) One has been reported to the police.
One is being investigated to determine if it was lost or stolen;
(b) the same day the theft occurred;
(c) no outcome from police, DPP reimbursed through insurance;
(d) it has not yet been determined if a theft occurred.
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
a) There were no thefts or losses reported to the police.
b) Not applicable
c) Not applicable
d) The stolen mobile phone was not reported to police due to the age of the item and its low financial value.
LEGAL AID WA
(a) Only one of the two lost items was reported to the Police .
(b) December 2002.
(c) No outcome from the Police, Legal Aid reimbursed through insurance for both items.
(d) One theft was not reported due to an oversight.
OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER
(a) – (d) Not applicable
OFFICE OF HEALTH REVIEW
(a) – (d) Not applicable
W.A. ELECTORAL COMMISSION
(a) 1
(b) April 2001
(c) No outcome
(d) Not applicable.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.