❓ A member of parliament is questioning payments made to a former politician and a law firm by agencies within the Attorney General's portfolio. The response indicates no payments to the former politician, but confirms payments to the law firm Minter Ellison.
AnsweredQoN 1668Legislative Assembly
Asked
14 October 2009
Member
Portfolio
Attorney General; Minister for Corrective Services
QuestionView source ↗
Could the Attorney General advise:
(a) has the Hon. Cheryl Edwardes received any payment from any agency within the Attorney General’s portfolio or the Minister’s Office since 23 September 2008 for any service provided by Ms Edwardes, including any leadership or career workshop conducted by Ms Edwardes;
(i) if yes to (a), what is the cost associated with any payment or payments made to Ms Edwardes and for what service was she paid;
(b) since 23 September 2008 has the law firm Minter Ellison received any payment from any agency within the Attorney General’s portfolio or the Attorney General’s Office for any service provided by the firm; and
(i) if yes to (b), what is the cost associated with any payment or payments made to Minter Ellison?
(a) has the Hon. Cheryl Edwardes received any payment from any agency within the Attorney General’s portfolio or the Minister’s Office since 23 September 2008 for any service provided by Ms Edwardes, including any leadership or career workshop conducted by Ms Edwardes;
(i) if yes to (a), what is the cost associated with any payment or payments made to Ms Edwardes and for what service was she paid;
(b) since 23 September 2008 has the law firm Minter Ellison received any payment from any agency within the Attorney General’s portfolio or the Attorney General’s Office for any service provided by the firm; and
(i) if yes to (b), what is the cost associated with any payment or payments made to Minter Ellison?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
18 November 2009
Response time
35 days
Commissioner for Children and Young People; Corruption and Crime Commission of Western Australia; Department of Corrective Services; Equal Opportunity Commission of Western Australia; Law Reform Commission of Western Australia; Legal Aid Commission of Western Australia; Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions; Office of the Information Commissioner advise:
(a) No
(i) Not applicable
(b) No.
(i) Not applicable.
Department of the Attorney General
(a) No.
(i) Not applicable.
(b) Yes.
(i) $24,422.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
(a) No
(i) Not applicable
(b) No.
(i) Not applicable.
Department of the Attorney General
(a) No.
(i) Not applicable.
(b) Yes.
(i) $24,422.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.