Home›Questions on Notice›QoN 695

❓ Hon Robin Chapple asks the Minister for Indigenous Affairs to confirm whether specific Indigenous sites identified in a 2001 survey will be protected under the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972. The answer provided is incomplete and repetitive, failing to clearly address the question.

AnsweredQoN 695Legislative Council

Asked

10 April 2003

Member

Hon Robin Chapple

Portfolio

Indigenous Affairs

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to the Aboriginal Heritage Survey of Tenements in the Mount Jackson-Windarling area conducted by AIC in May-June 2001. With regard to my question without notice No. 756 of April 2 2003 and the answers provided, I ask -
(1) Given the Minister’s confirmation that Indigenous sites of significance will be protected whether they are registered or not, will the Minister now confirm whether or not the following sites of significance to Indigenous people, as listed in the AIC survey, will be afforded protection under the
Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972
-
(a) KY 24;
(b) KY 27;
(c) KY 28;
(d) KY 29;
(e) KY 30;
(f) KY 31;
(g) KY 33; and
(h) KY 34?
(2) If no to (1), why not?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered

6 May 2003

Responded by

Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Indigenous Affairs

Response time

26 days

(b) KY 27; (c) KY 28; (d) KY 29; (e) KY 30; (f) KY 31; (g) KY 33; and (h) KY 34?
(c) KY 28; (d) KY 29; (e) KY 30; (f) KY 31; (g) KY 33; and (h) KY 34?
(d) KY 29; (e) KY 30; (f) KY 31; (g) KY 33; and (h) KY 34?
(e) KY 30; (f) KY 31; (g) KY 33; and (h) KY 34?
(f) KY 31; (g) KY 33; and (h) KY 34?
(g) KY 33; and (h) KY 34?
(h) KY 34?
(2) Not applicable

View on Parliament of WA