Mr. Johnston questions the Minister for Mines and Petroleum regarding the perceived lack of prioritisation of mine site fatalities, contrasting it with the focus on industry profitability. The Minister dismisses the question as stupid and defends the department's attention to the issue.

AnsweredQoN 429Legislative Assembly
Asked
20 May 2015
Portfolio
Mines and Petroleum

QuestionView source ↗

DEPARTMENT
OF MINES AND PETROLEUM — MINE SITE FATALITIES
429. Mr W.J. JOHNSTON to the
Minister for Mines and Petroleum:
I ask a supplementary question. If it is the ministerXXX ###XXXs number one priority, why does he not
think it is a significant issue affecting the Department of Mines and
Petroleum? He is happy to talk about the profitability of miners and investment
in the industry, but why does he not consider a significance issue to be the
number of mine deaths in this state?

AnswerView source ↗

That is a stupid supplementary question. Obviously, we
consider it. We have the statistics. Just because it is not in the budget
papers that does not mean it —
Mr W.J. Johnston :
It is not a priority.
Mr W.R. MARMION :
That is in the member for CanningtonXXX ###XXXs
opinion. Just because he does not see a figure in a document, he thinks that it
is not a priority. The member for Cannington is not always right.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more