Question regarding the Minister's decision to authorise a biosecurity rating for the Bridgetown Greenbushes Shire, including consultation details, exclusion of other shires, rating cost discrepancies, and review timeline of the Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Act 2007.

⏳ Awaiting AnswerQoN 4399Legislative Assembly
Asked
27 November 2018
Portfolio
Regional Development; Agriculture and Food; Minister Assisting the Minister for State Development, Jobs and Trade

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to the Minister's decision to authorise a biosecurity rating that covers the Bridgetown Greenbushes Shire, and ask: (a) what was the extent of the consultation that occurred with the affected parties, prior to making the decision to support this rating; (b) why did the Minister not include the shires of Nannup and Boyup Brook in approving a biosecurity rating; (c) were the views of the respective shire councils of Nannup and Boyup Brook significant to the Minister's decision to exclude them from the Biosecurity rating; (d) why are pensioners living in Bridgetown paying $40 while farmers with significant holdings pay $50; and (e) can the Minister confirm the timeline for the review of the Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Act 2007 ?

AnswerView source ↗

This question is awaiting a response from the Minister.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more