❓ Details litigation involving various entities under Acts like Soil & Land Conservation, Veterinary Preparations, and Marketing of Potatoes, along with rent recovery actions by the Perth Markets Authority and contractual disputes involving the Forest Products Commission.
AnsweredQoN 16Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(b) 2002; or (c) 2003?
(c) 2003?
(c) 2003?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
24 May 2005
Responded by
Minister for Agriculture and Forestry
Response time
56 days
(1) Yes (2) (a) - (c) This question was answered in May 2003 giving details of litigation up until April 2003. I refer the Member to the answer to question 592 (Hansard of Thursday 8 May, 2003). Between the last answer and the end of 2003 the following actions took place. Petty Sessions prosecution of Michael Arthur Bourke and Jodie Leanne Bourke under the Soil & Land conservation Act Petty Sessions prosecution of Beermullah Pty Ltd under the Soil & Land Conservation Petty Sessions prosecution of John Edward Neave and Mary Connie under the Soil & Land Conservation Act Petty sessions prosecution of Triangle Agencies under the Veterinary Preparations & Animal Feeding Stuffs Act. Petty Sessions prosecution of Michael Ken Patane and Pennie Joanne Patane under the Soil & Land Conservation Act Petty Session prosecution of Thomson & Redwood 2001 Pty Ltd under the Veterinary Preparations and Animal Feeding Stuffs Regulations The provision of a further summary of the actions would require a considerable re-allocation of resources and require legal advice as to whether such details could be given without prejudicing the case. Should the member require details of any particular matter I will endeavour to provide it. Potato Marketing Corporation (1 a-c) Yes (2) The Potato Marketing has taken the following action as Plaintiff during 2001-2002 to ensure compliance with the Marketing of Potatoes Act and Regulations. 2001 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $3,250 plus costs of $4,622 2002 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $15,000 plus costs of $500 2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
(2) (a) - (c) This question was answered in May 2003 giving details of litigation up until April 2003. I refer the Member to the answer to question 592 (Hansard of Thursday 8 May, 2003). Between the last answer and the end of 2003 the following actions took place. Petty Sessions prosecution of Michael Arthur Bourke and Jodie Leanne Bourke under the Soil & Land conservation Act Petty Sessions prosecution of Beermullah Pty Ltd under the Soil & Land Conservation Petty Sessions prosecution of John Edward Neave and Mary Connie under the Soil & Land Conservation Act Petty sessions prosecution of Triangle Agencies under the Veterinary Preparations & Animal Feeding Stuffs Act. Petty Sessions prosecution of Michael Ken Patane and Pennie Joanne Patane under the Soil & Land Conservation Act Petty Session prosecution of Thomson & Redwood 2001 Pty Ltd under the Veterinary Preparations and Animal Feeding Stuffs Regulations The provision of a further summary of the actions would require a considerable re-allocation of resources and require legal advice as to whether such details could be given without prejudicing the case. Should the member require details of any particular matter I will endeavour to provide it. Potato Marketing Corporation (1 a-c) Yes (2) The Potato Marketing has taken the following action as Plaintiff during 2001-2002 to ensure compliance with the Marketing of Potatoes Act and Regulations. 2001 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $3,250 plus costs of $4,622 2002 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $15,000 plus costs of $500 2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Between the last answer and the end of 2003 the following actions took place. Petty Sessions prosecution of Michael Arthur Bourke and Jodie Leanne Bourke under the Soil & Land conservation Act Petty Sessions prosecution of Beermullah Pty Ltd under the Soil & Land Conservation Petty Sessions prosecution of John Edward Neave and Mary Connie under the Soil & Land Conservation Act Petty sessions prosecution of Triangle Agencies under the Veterinary Preparations & Animal Feeding Stuffs Act. Petty Sessions prosecution of Michael Ken Patane and Pennie Joanne Patane under the Soil & Land Conservation Act Petty Session prosecution of Thomson & Redwood 2001 Pty Ltd under the Veterinary Preparations and Animal Feeding Stuffs Regulations The provision of a further summary of the actions would require a considerable re-allocation of resources and require legal advice as to whether such details could be given without prejudicing the case. Should the member require details of any particular matter I will endeavour to provide it. Potato Marketing Corporation (1 a-c) Yes (2) The Potato Marketing has taken the following action as Plaintiff during 2001-2002 to ensure compliance with the Marketing of Potatoes Act and Regulations. 2001 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $3,250 plus costs of $4,622 2002 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $15,000 plus costs of $500 2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Petty Sessions prosecution of Michael Arthur Bourke and Jodie Leanne Bourke under the Soil & Land conservation Act Petty Sessions prosecution of Beermullah Pty Ltd under the Soil & Land Conservation Petty Sessions prosecution of John Edward Neave and Mary Connie under the Soil & Land Conservation Act Petty sessions prosecution of Triangle Agencies under the Veterinary Preparations & Animal Feeding Stuffs Act. Petty Sessions prosecution of Michael Ken Patane and Pennie Joanne Patane under the Soil & Land Conservation Act Petty Session prosecution of Thomson & Redwood 2001 Pty Ltd under the Veterinary Preparations and Animal Feeding Stuffs Regulations The provision of a further summary of the actions would require a considerable re-allocation of resources and require legal advice as to whether such details could be given without prejudicing the case. Should the member require details of any particular matter I will endeavour to provide it. Potato Marketing Corporation (1 a-c) Yes (2) The Potato Marketing has taken the following action as Plaintiff during 2001-2002 to ensure compliance with the Marketing of Potatoes Act and Regulations. 2001 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $3,250 plus costs of $4,622 2002 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $15,000 plus costs of $500 2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
The provision of a further summary of the actions would require a considerable re-allocation of resources and require legal advice as to whether such details could be given without prejudicing the case. Should the member require details of any particular matter I will endeavour to provide it. Potato Marketing Corporation (1 a-c) Yes (2) The Potato Marketing has taken the following action as Plaintiff during 2001-2002 to ensure compliance with the Marketing of Potatoes Act and Regulations. 2001 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $3,250 plus costs of $4,622 2002 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $15,000 plus costs of $500 2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Potato Marketing Corporation (1 a-c) Yes (2) The Potato Marketing has taken the following action as Plaintiff during 2001-2002 to ensure compliance with the Marketing of Potatoes Act and Regulations. 2001 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $3,250 plus costs of $4,622 2002 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $15,000 plus costs of $500 2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
(1 a-c) Yes (2) The Potato Marketing has taken the following action as Plaintiff during 2001-2002 to ensure compliance with the Marketing of Potatoes Act and Regulations. 2001 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $3,250 plus costs of $4,622 2002 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $15,000 plus costs of $500 2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
(2) The Potato Marketing has taken the following action as Plaintiff during 2001-2002 to ensure compliance with the Marketing of Potatoes Act and Regulations. 2001 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $3,250 plus costs of $4,622 2002 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $15,000 plus costs of $500 2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
2001 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $3,250 plus costs of $4,622 2002 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $15,000 plus costs of $500 2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
2002 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $15,000 plus costs of $500 2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
(1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
(2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
(a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
(b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
(c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
(2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
· Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
· Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
· Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
(2) (a) - (c) This question was answered in May 2003 giving details of litigation up until April 2003. I refer the Member to the answer to question 592 (Hansard of Thursday 8 May, 2003). Between the last answer and the end of 2003 the following actions took place. Petty Sessions prosecution of Michael Arthur Bourke and Jodie Leanne Bourke under the Soil & Land conservation Act Petty Sessions prosecution of Beermullah Pty Ltd under the Soil & Land Conservation Petty Sessions prosecution of John Edward Neave and Mary Connie under the Soil & Land Conservation Act Petty sessions prosecution of Triangle Agencies under the Veterinary Preparations & Animal Feeding Stuffs Act. Petty Sessions prosecution of Michael Ken Patane and Pennie Joanne Patane under the Soil & Land Conservation Act Petty Session prosecution of Thomson & Redwood 2001 Pty Ltd under the Veterinary Preparations and Animal Feeding Stuffs Regulations The provision of a further summary of the actions would require a considerable re-allocation of resources and require legal advice as to whether such details could be given without prejudicing the case. Should the member require details of any particular matter I will endeavour to provide it. Potato Marketing Corporation (1 a-c) Yes (2) The Potato Marketing has taken the following action as Plaintiff during 2001-2002 to ensure compliance with the Marketing of Potatoes Act and Regulations. 2001 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $3,250 plus costs of $4,622 2002 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $15,000 plus costs of $500 2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Between the last answer and the end of 2003 the following actions took place. Petty Sessions prosecution of Michael Arthur Bourke and Jodie Leanne Bourke under the Soil & Land conservation Act Petty Sessions prosecution of Beermullah Pty Ltd under the Soil & Land Conservation Petty Sessions prosecution of John Edward Neave and Mary Connie under the Soil & Land Conservation Act Petty sessions prosecution of Triangle Agencies under the Veterinary Preparations & Animal Feeding Stuffs Act. Petty Sessions prosecution of Michael Ken Patane and Pennie Joanne Patane under the Soil & Land Conservation Act Petty Session prosecution of Thomson & Redwood 2001 Pty Ltd under the Veterinary Preparations and Animal Feeding Stuffs Regulations The provision of a further summary of the actions would require a considerable re-allocation of resources and require legal advice as to whether such details could be given without prejudicing the case. Should the member require details of any particular matter I will endeavour to provide it. Potato Marketing Corporation (1 a-c) Yes (2) The Potato Marketing has taken the following action as Plaintiff during 2001-2002 to ensure compliance with the Marketing of Potatoes Act and Regulations. 2001 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $3,250 plus costs of $4,622 2002 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $15,000 plus costs of $500 2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Petty Sessions prosecution of Michael Arthur Bourke and Jodie Leanne Bourke under the Soil & Land conservation Act Petty Sessions prosecution of Beermullah Pty Ltd under the Soil & Land Conservation Petty Sessions prosecution of John Edward Neave and Mary Connie under the Soil & Land Conservation Act Petty sessions prosecution of Triangle Agencies under the Veterinary Preparations & Animal Feeding Stuffs Act. Petty Sessions prosecution of Michael Ken Patane and Pennie Joanne Patane under the Soil & Land Conservation Act Petty Session prosecution of Thomson & Redwood 2001 Pty Ltd under the Veterinary Preparations and Animal Feeding Stuffs Regulations The provision of a further summary of the actions would require a considerable re-allocation of resources and require legal advice as to whether such details could be given without prejudicing the case. Should the member require details of any particular matter I will endeavour to provide it. Potato Marketing Corporation (1 a-c) Yes (2) The Potato Marketing has taken the following action as Plaintiff during 2001-2002 to ensure compliance with the Marketing of Potatoes Act and Regulations. 2001 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $3,250 plus costs of $4,622 2002 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $15,000 plus costs of $500 2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
The provision of a further summary of the actions would require a considerable re-allocation of resources and require legal advice as to whether such details could be given without prejudicing the case. Should the member require details of any particular matter I will endeavour to provide it. Potato Marketing Corporation (1 a-c) Yes (2) The Potato Marketing has taken the following action as Plaintiff during 2001-2002 to ensure compliance with the Marketing of Potatoes Act and Regulations. 2001 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $3,250 plus costs of $4,622 2002 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $15,000 plus costs of $500 2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Potato Marketing Corporation (1 a-c) Yes (2) The Potato Marketing has taken the following action as Plaintiff during 2001-2002 to ensure compliance with the Marketing of Potatoes Act and Regulations. 2001 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $3,250 plus costs of $4,622 2002 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $15,000 plus costs of $500 2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
(1 a-c) Yes (2) The Potato Marketing has taken the following action as Plaintiff during 2001-2002 to ensure compliance with the Marketing of Potatoes Act and Regulations. 2001 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $3,250 plus costs of $4,622 2002 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $15,000 plus costs of $500 2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
(2) The Potato Marketing has taken the following action as Plaintiff during 2001-2002 to ensure compliance with the Marketing of Potatoes Act and Regulations. 2001 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $3,250 plus costs of $4,622 2002 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $15,000 plus costs of $500 2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
2001 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $3,250 plus costs of $4,622 2002 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $15,000 plus costs of $500 2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
2002 - Defendant Gaterange Pty Ltd. Found guilty and fined $15,000 plus costs of $500 2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
2003 - Defendant A Galati - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
2003 - Defendant Galati Nominees - Matter was ongoing at 31 December 03 Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Perth Markets Authority (1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
(1 a-c) Yes (2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
(2) In 2002 the Perth Markets Authority was plaintiff in the following actions to recover outstanding rent and outgoings due under a lease agreement. Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Perth Local Court Action 14836/2002 Defendant - A Khan Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Perth Local Court Action 23968/2002 Defendant - M Fontana Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Perth Local Court Action 23970/2002 Defendant - Melonglow Pty Ltd In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
In 2003 two breach of bylaws prosecutions commenced: 9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
9 May 2003 Defendant - Domenic Scutti 6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
6 November 03 Defendant - Nicholas Langley Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Forest Products Commission (a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
(a) 2001 - No litigation. (b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
(b) 2002 - No litigation. (c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
(c) 2003 - Yes. Three matters. (2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
(2) · Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
· Contractual Dispute with Mr W N Crocker - ongoing. Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Mr W N Crocker placed a writ alleging the Department of Conservation and Land Management had prior to 16 November 2000 (when the Forest Products Commission incorporated) and the Forest Products Commission now has, an obligation to sign a production contract for log supply. Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Mr Crocker has received advice from, and attended meetings with the Forest Products Commission with, several legal practitioners including barrister Hockley, all of whom appear to have accepted that the Forest Products Commission has no case to answer. Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Mr Crocker represented himself at the hearing of his writ and the Forest Products Commission was represented by the Ministry of Justice. Mediation was considered inappropriate and Mr Crocker was to seek further legal advice on advisability of continuing his actions. Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Mr Crocker has legal representation and is pursuing his claim. Discovery is proceeding. · Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
· Auscorp Pty Ltd v Forest Products Commission Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Cross-claims Auscorp for breach of contract and the Forest Products Commission for unpaid amounts for wood delivery. Settlement terms agreed and court action suspended pro tem. · Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
· Vasse Firewood v Forest Products Commission The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
The Forest Products Commission denies breach of contract. Counter-claim for unpaid wood supply accounts. Litigation entered by Plaintiff. Crown Solicitor's Office advises no further action to date. The Forest Products Commission to pursue having Plaintiff's plaint struck out and orders for moneys owed plus costs.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.