❓ A WA parliamentary question on notice regarding potential industrial and infrastructure development on the Burrup Peninsula, specifically sites D, E, and lease J736317. The Minister provides details on interested parties and the decision-making process for land allocation.
AnsweredQoN 810Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
BURRUP PENINSULA — LEASES
I refer to sites D, E and general lease J736317 on the Burrup Peninsula. (1) How many companies or government departments are actively considering using or leasing these areas for industrial or infrastructure development? (2) Will the minister provide company and agency names for all interested parties seeking to use or lease these land allocations? (3) If there is more than one interested party for these leases or land allocations, what will the decision-making parameter be for land allocation for the various applicants? Hon NORMAN MOORE
I refer to sites D, E and general lease J736317 on the Burrup Peninsula. (1) How many companies or government departments are actively considering using or leasing these areas for industrial or infrastructure development? (2) Will the minister provide company and agency names for all interested parties seeking to use or lease these land allocations? (3) If there is more than one interested party for these leases or land allocations, what will the decision-making parameter be for land allocation for the various applicants? Hon NORMAN MOORE
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) On site D, two companies and one government agency are currently considering using this land for industrial infrastructure development. Site E is currently leased to Woodside Energy Ltd for lay-down and other purposes associated with the Pluto LNG project—lease J736317. One company is considering using this land for future development, and one government agency has expressed interest in using part of this land. (2) The companies considering the use of site D are Burrup Nitrates Pty Ltd—ammonium nitrate, and Archean Group/Nova Strategies—urea. The Water Corporation is seeking a site for a desalination plant. (3) The decision on land allocation was made according to the overall benefits to the state, including whether the industrial development will utilise the common-user infrastructure in the estate, and the time line of that particular project.
(1) How many companies or government departments are actively considering using or leasing these areas for industrial or infrastructure development? (2) Will the minister provide company and agency names for all interested parties seeking to use or lease these land allocations? (3) If there is more than one interested party for these leases or land allocations, what will the decision-making parameter be for land allocation for the various applicants? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) On site D, two companies and one government agency are currently considering using this land for industrial infrastructure development. Site E is currently leased to Woodside Energy Ltd for lay-down and other purposes associated with the Pluto LNG project—lease J736317. One company is considering using this land for future development, and one government agency has expressed interest in using part of this land. (2) The companies considering the use of site D are Burrup Nitrates Pty Ltd—ammonium nitrate, and Archean Group/Nova Strategies—urea. The Water Corporation is seeking a site for a desalination plant. (3) The decision on land allocation was made according to the overall benefits to the state, including whether the industrial development will utilise the common-user infrastructure in the estate, and the time line of that particular project.
(2) Will the minister provide company and agency names for all interested parties seeking to use or lease these land allocations? (3) If there is more than one interested party for these leases or land allocations, what will the decision-making parameter be for land allocation for the various applicants? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) On site D, two companies and one government agency are currently considering using this land for industrial infrastructure development. Site E is currently leased to Woodside Energy Ltd for lay-down and other purposes associated with the Pluto LNG project—lease J736317. One company is considering using this land for future development, and one government agency has expressed interest in using part of this land. (2) The companies considering the use of site D are Burrup Nitrates Pty Ltd—ammonium nitrate, and Archean Group/Nova Strategies—urea. The Water Corporation is seeking a site for a desalination plant. (3) The decision on land allocation was made according to the overall benefits to the state, including whether the industrial development will utilise the common-user infrastructure in the estate, and the time line of that particular project.
(3) If there is more than one interested party for these leases or land allocations, what will the decision-making parameter be for land allocation for the various applicants? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) On site D, two companies and one government agency are currently considering using this land for industrial infrastructure development. Site E is currently leased to Woodside Energy Ltd for lay-down and other purposes associated with the Pluto LNG project—lease J736317. One company is considering using this land for future development, and one government agency has expressed interest in using part of this land. (2) The companies considering the use of site D are Burrup Nitrates Pty Ltd—ammonium nitrate, and Archean Group/Nova Strategies—urea. The Water Corporation is seeking a site for a desalination plant. (3) The decision on land allocation was made according to the overall benefits to the state, including whether the industrial development will utilise the common-user infrastructure in the estate, and the time line of that particular project.
Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) On site D, two companies and one government agency are currently considering using this land for industrial infrastructure development. Site E is currently leased to Woodside Energy Ltd for lay-down and other purposes associated with the Pluto LNG project—lease J736317. One company is considering using this land for future development, and one government agency has expressed interest in using part of this land. (2) The companies considering the use of site D are Burrup Nitrates Pty Ltd—ammonium nitrate, and Archean Group/Nova Strategies—urea. The Water Corporation is seeking a site for a desalination plant. (3) The decision on land allocation was made according to the overall benefits to the state, including whether the industrial development will utilise the common-user infrastructure in the estate, and the time line of that particular project.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) On site D, two companies and one government agency are currently considering using this land for industrial infrastructure development. Site E is currently leased to Woodside Energy Ltd for lay-down and other purposes associated with the Pluto LNG project—lease J736317. One company is considering using this land for future development, and one government agency has expressed interest in using part of this land. (2) The companies considering the use of site D are Burrup Nitrates Pty Ltd—ammonium nitrate, and Archean Group/Nova Strategies—urea. The Water Corporation is seeking a site for a desalination plant. (3) The decision on land allocation was made according to the overall benefits to the state, including whether the industrial development will utilise the common-user infrastructure in the estate, and the time line of that particular project.
(1) On site D, two companies and one government agency are currently considering using this land for industrial infrastructure development. Site E is currently leased to Woodside Energy Ltd for lay-down and other purposes associated with the Pluto LNG project—lease J736317. One company is considering using this land for future development, and one government agency has expressed interest in using part of this land. (2) The companies considering the use of site D are Burrup Nitrates Pty Ltd—ammonium nitrate, and Archean Group/Nova Strategies—urea. The Water Corporation is seeking a site for a desalination plant. (3) The decision on land allocation was made according to the overall benefits to the state, including whether the industrial development will utilise the common-user infrastructure in the estate, and the time line of that particular project.
(2) The companies considering the use of site D are Burrup Nitrates Pty Ltd—ammonium nitrate, and Archean Group/Nova Strategies—urea. The Water Corporation is seeking a site for a desalination plant. (3) The decision on land allocation was made according to the overall benefits to the state, including whether the industrial development will utilise the common-user infrastructure in the estate, and the time line of that particular project.
(3) The decision on land allocation was made according to the overall benefits to the state, including whether the industrial development will utilise the common-user infrastructure in the estate, and the time line of that particular project.
(1) How many companies or government departments are actively considering using or leasing these areas for industrial or infrastructure development? (2) Will the minister provide company and agency names for all interested parties seeking to use or lease these land allocations? (3) If there is more than one interested party for these leases or land allocations, what will the decision-making parameter be for land allocation for the various applicants? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) On site D, two companies and one government agency are currently considering using this land for industrial infrastructure development. Site E is currently leased to Woodside Energy Ltd for lay-down and other purposes associated with the Pluto LNG project—lease J736317. One company is considering using this land for future development, and one government agency has expressed interest in using part of this land. (2) The companies considering the use of site D are Burrup Nitrates Pty Ltd—ammonium nitrate, and Archean Group/Nova Strategies—urea. The Water Corporation is seeking a site for a desalination plant. (3) The decision on land allocation was made according to the overall benefits to the state, including whether the industrial development will utilise the common-user infrastructure in the estate, and the time line of that particular project.
(2) Will the minister provide company and agency names for all interested parties seeking to use or lease these land allocations? (3) If there is more than one interested party for these leases or land allocations, what will the decision-making parameter be for land allocation for the various applicants? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) On site D, two companies and one government agency are currently considering using this land for industrial infrastructure development. Site E is currently leased to Woodside Energy Ltd for lay-down and other purposes associated with the Pluto LNG project—lease J736317. One company is considering using this land for future development, and one government agency has expressed interest in using part of this land. (2) The companies considering the use of site D are Burrup Nitrates Pty Ltd—ammonium nitrate, and Archean Group/Nova Strategies—urea. The Water Corporation is seeking a site for a desalination plant. (3) The decision on land allocation was made according to the overall benefits to the state, including whether the industrial development will utilise the common-user infrastructure in the estate, and the time line of that particular project.
(3) If there is more than one interested party for these leases or land allocations, what will the decision-making parameter be for land allocation for the various applicants? Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) On site D, two companies and one government agency are currently considering using this land for industrial infrastructure development. Site E is currently leased to Woodside Energy Ltd for lay-down and other purposes associated with the Pluto LNG project—lease J736317. One company is considering using this land for future development, and one government agency has expressed interest in using part of this land. (2) The companies considering the use of site D are Burrup Nitrates Pty Ltd—ammonium nitrate, and Archean Group/Nova Strategies—urea. The Water Corporation is seeking a site for a desalination plant. (3) The decision on land allocation was made according to the overall benefits to the state, including whether the industrial development will utilise the common-user infrastructure in the estate, and the time line of that particular project.
Hon NORMAN MOORE replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) On site D, two companies and one government agency are currently considering using this land for industrial infrastructure development. Site E is currently leased to Woodside Energy Ltd for lay-down and other purposes associated with the Pluto LNG project—lease J736317. One company is considering using this land for future development, and one government agency has expressed interest in using part of this land. (2) The companies considering the use of site D are Burrup Nitrates Pty Ltd—ammonium nitrate, and Archean Group/Nova Strategies—urea. The Water Corporation is seeking a site for a desalination plant. (3) The decision on land allocation was made according to the overall benefits to the state, including whether the industrial development will utilise the common-user infrastructure in the estate, and the time line of that particular project.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) On site D, two companies and one government agency are currently considering using this land for industrial infrastructure development. Site E is currently leased to Woodside Energy Ltd for lay-down and other purposes associated with the Pluto LNG project—lease J736317. One company is considering using this land for future development, and one government agency has expressed interest in using part of this land. (2) The companies considering the use of site D are Burrup Nitrates Pty Ltd—ammonium nitrate, and Archean Group/Nova Strategies—urea. The Water Corporation is seeking a site for a desalination plant. (3) The decision on land allocation was made according to the overall benefits to the state, including whether the industrial development will utilise the common-user infrastructure in the estate, and the time line of that particular project.
(1) On site D, two companies and one government agency are currently considering using this land for industrial infrastructure development. Site E is currently leased to Woodside Energy Ltd for lay-down and other purposes associated with the Pluto LNG project—lease J736317. One company is considering using this land for future development, and one government agency has expressed interest in using part of this land. (2) The companies considering the use of site D are Burrup Nitrates Pty Ltd—ammonium nitrate, and Archean Group/Nova Strategies—urea. The Water Corporation is seeking a site for a desalination plant. (3) The decision on land allocation was made according to the overall benefits to the state, including whether the industrial development will utilise the common-user infrastructure in the estate, and the time line of that particular project.
(2) The companies considering the use of site D are Burrup Nitrates Pty Ltd—ammonium nitrate, and Archean Group/Nova Strategies—urea. The Water Corporation is seeking a site for a desalination plant. (3) The decision on land allocation was made according to the overall benefits to the state, including whether the industrial development will utilise the common-user infrastructure in the estate, and the time line of that particular project.
(3) The decision on land allocation was made according to the overall benefits to the state, including whether the industrial development will utilise the common-user infrastructure in the estate, and the time line of that particular project.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.