❓ Hon Peter Collier questions the Premier regarding the rejection of a Lotterywest grant application by Margaret Court Community Outreach, seeking clarification on reasons and correspondence related to the decision.
AnsweredQoN 52Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
LOTTERYWEST GRANTS — VICTORY LIFE CENTRE
52. Hon
PETER COLLIER to the Leader of
the House representing the Premier:
I refer to the response to question
without notice 10 asked on Tuesday, 4 May 2021.
(1) What were the
''other reasons'' that the Lotterywest grant application by
Margaret Court Community Outreach was rejected?
(2) Why were the ''other
reasons'' not included in the response to question without notice 1158
asked on Thursday, 22 October 2020?
(3) With
reference to part (4) of the question, how was Margaret Court Community
Outreach notified that its grant application containing all of the reasons
referred to in (2) had been rejected?
(4) Will the
minister table all correspondence referred to in (3); and, if not, why not?
52. Hon
PETER COLLIER to the Leader of
the House representing the Premier:
I refer to the response to question
without notice 10 asked on Tuesday, 4 May 2021.
(1) What were the
''other reasons'' that the Lotterywest grant application by
Margaret Court Community Outreach was rejected?
(2) Why were the ''other
reasons'' not included in the response to question without notice 1158
asked on Thursday, 22 October 2020?
(3) With
reference to part (4) of the question, how was Margaret Court Community
Outreach notified that its grant application containing all of the reasons
referred to in (2) had been rejected?
(4) Will the
minister table all correspondence referred to in (3); and, if not, why not?
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the honourable member for
some notice of the question.
(1) I refer the
member to part (3) of the answer to question without notice 10 of 4 May 2021.
(2) The board
determined not to progress the application to full assessment.
(3) I refer to
the answer to part (2). The reason for not progressing to full assessment was
outlined to representatives of Margaret Court Community Outreach at a meeting
on 2 October 2020 and in writing on 7 October 2020.
(4) I table the
correspondence referred to.
[See paper 165.]
some notice of the question.
(1) I refer the
member to part (3) of the answer to question without notice 10 of 4 May 2021.
(2) The board
determined not to progress the application to full assessment.
(3) I refer to
the answer to part (2). The reason for not progressing to full assessment was
outlined to representatives of Margaret Court Community Outreach at a meeting
on 2 October 2020 and in writing on 7 October 2020.
(4) I table the
correspondence referred to.
[See paper 165.]
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.