❓ Mr. Love questions whether WA's infrastructure program fares better under a federal Coalition government than Labor. The Treasurer responds that WA is comparatively well-positioned due to effective pipeline management and avoidance of large, risky projects.
AnsweredQoN 875Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
INFRASTRUCTURE
INVESTMENT PROGRAM — FEDERAL–STATE FUNDING
875. Mr R.S. LOVE to the Treasurer:
I have a supplementary question. Is
it fair to say that Western Australia's infrastructure program is
better treated by a federal coalition government than by Labor?
Several members interjected.
The SPEAKER : Order, please!
INVESTMENT PROGRAM — FEDERAL–STATE FUNDING
875. Mr R.S. LOVE to the Treasurer:
I have a supplementary question. Is
it fair to say that Western Australia's infrastructure program is
better treated by a federal coalition government than by Labor?
Several members interjected.
The SPEAKER : Order, please!
AnswerView source ↗
My understanding is that when it all
comes out, even despite the challenges that I just raised, that when compared with the other states, WA will be treated better
than the other states. That is my impression of what will be happening ,
but this will be for a couple of reasons. Firstly, the other states have
projects worth —
Mr R.S. Love interjected.
Ms R. SAFFIOTI : I was going to give the member a description
—
Several members interjected.
The SPEAKER : Order, please! Sorry, you have had the
opportunity to ask your supplementary question. The minister has fairly
begun her answer.
Ms R. SAFFIOTI : In comparative terms in relation to this
infrastructure review, we have had cost challenges. I have always said that.
But I tell members what: a cost challenge on a $200 million project compared
with a $10 billion project is very different. When a state is running $5 billion
and $10 billion projects and there is a 30 or 40 per cent cost increase,
that is major. The other states are in a very different position from us. We
have managed our pipeline more effectively. We have a longer pipeline of work.
We have not entered into $10 billion public–private partnerships, which
are very risky in relation to cost exposure.
We are in a better position to deal with any decision by the
federal government, but, as I said, we are very pro WA and we will fight for
every project. In relation to the other states, because we have managed our
pipeline better, because we have not entered into $10 billion commitments, and
because we worked well with both sides of government, we are much better placed
to deal with any decisions should they come.
comes out, even despite the challenges that I just raised, that when compared with the other states, WA will be treated better
than the other states. That is my impression of what will be happening ,
but this will be for a couple of reasons. Firstly, the other states have
projects worth —
Mr R.S. Love interjected.
Ms R. SAFFIOTI : I was going to give the member a description
—
Several members interjected.
The SPEAKER : Order, please! Sorry, you have had the
opportunity to ask your supplementary question. The minister has fairly
begun her answer.
Ms R. SAFFIOTI : In comparative terms in relation to this
infrastructure review, we have had cost challenges. I have always said that.
But I tell members what: a cost challenge on a $200 million project compared
with a $10 billion project is very different. When a state is running $5 billion
and $10 billion projects and there is a 30 or 40 per cent cost increase,
that is major. The other states are in a very different position from us. We
have managed our pipeline more effectively. We have a longer pipeline of work.
We have not entered into $10 billion public–private partnerships, which
are very risky in relation to cost exposure.
We are in a better position to deal with any decision by the
federal government, but, as I said, we are very pro WA and we will fight for
every project. In relation to the other states, because we have managed our
pipeline better, because we have not entered into $10 billion commitments, and
because we worked well with both sides of government, we are much better placed
to deal with any decisions should they come.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.