❓ Hon Robin Chapple questions the cleanliness and safety of handwash facilities at Barrick Gold's Raleigh Mine, seeking details on inspections, complaints, and potential breaches of safety regulations. The Minister referred to parliamentary question 2516.
AnsweredQoN 2556Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to the photograph posted for viewing at,
http://www.robinchapple.org.au/node/460
entitled, ‘2010-06-28 Raleigh Handwash Facilities.pdf’ showing handwash facilities taken at the underground crib room at the Raleigh Mine in the Kalgoorlie region owned by Barrick Gold, and ask -
(1) With regards to the photographs referred to above, does the Resources Safety Division of the Department of Mines and Petroleum (DMP) consider the handwash facilities depicted in the photographs taken at Raleigh Mine and referred to above to be clean, hygienic and safe to be around?
(2) If yes to (1), why?
(3) If no to (1), why not?
(4) With regards to (1) can the Minister state what the risk to workers occupational health and safety is given the state and condition of the handwash facilities as depicted in the photographs referred to?
(5) If no to (4), why not?
(6) Can the Minister state how many inspections have taken place by the DMP inspectorate at the Raleigh Mine site in the last 30 months?
(7) If no to (6), why not?
(8) Were any complaints/concerns recorded, both on the internal reporting system including in the Safety Toolbox Meeting Minutes Book and/or with the DMP, concerning this hand wash facilities depicted in the photographs referred to in (1), in the last 30 months?
(9) If yes to (8), -
(a) how many complaints/concerns were received by management of the company;
(b) on what date was each complaint/concern received;
(c) what specifically was each complaint/concern;
(d) what was done by the management of the company to resolve each issue;
(e) how long did each issue take to resolve;
(f) how many complaints/concerns were received by DMP inspectorate;
(g) on what date was each complaint/concern received;
(h) what specifically was done by the DMP inspectorate to address each issue that was raised; and
(i) on what date was each issue resolved?
(10) In light of (1), (4), and (9), have any sections of the
Mines Safety and Inspection Act 1994 and Regulations 1995
been breached including Regulation 7.17, which specific sections have been breached, and what is the maximum penalty for each breach?
(11) If yes to (10), will any responsible persons from Barrick Kanowna, including the resident manager, be prosecuted for these breaches?
(12) If no to (11), why not?
http://www.robinchapple.org.au/node/460
entitled, ‘2010-06-28 Raleigh Handwash Facilities.pdf’ showing handwash facilities taken at the underground crib room at the Raleigh Mine in the Kalgoorlie region owned by Barrick Gold, and ask -
(1) With regards to the photographs referred to above, does the Resources Safety Division of the Department of Mines and Petroleum (DMP) consider the handwash facilities depicted in the photographs taken at Raleigh Mine and referred to above to be clean, hygienic and safe to be around?
(2) If yes to (1), why?
(3) If no to (1), why not?
(4) With regards to (1) can the Minister state what the risk to workers occupational health and safety is given the state and condition of the handwash facilities as depicted in the photographs referred to?
(5) If no to (4), why not?
(6) Can the Minister state how many inspections have taken place by the DMP inspectorate at the Raleigh Mine site in the last 30 months?
(7) If no to (6), why not?
(8) Were any complaints/concerns recorded, both on the internal reporting system including in the Safety Toolbox Meeting Minutes Book and/or with the DMP, concerning this hand wash facilities depicted in the photographs referred to in (1), in the last 30 months?
(9) If yes to (8), -
(a) how many complaints/concerns were received by management of the company;
(b) on what date was each complaint/concern received;
(c) what specifically was each complaint/concern;
(d) what was done by the management of the company to resolve each issue;
(e) how long did each issue take to resolve;
(f) how many complaints/concerns were received by DMP inspectorate;
(g) on what date was each complaint/concern received;
(h) what specifically was done by the DMP inspectorate to address each issue that was raised; and
(i) on what date was each issue resolved?
(10) In light of (1), (4), and (9), have any sections of the
Mines Safety and Inspection Act 1994 and Regulations 1995
been breached including Regulation 7.17, which specific sections have been breached, and what is the maximum penalty for each breach?
(11) If yes to (10), will any responsible persons from Barrick Kanowna, including the resident manager, be prosecuted for these breaches?
(12) If no to (11), why not?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
10 August 2010
Responded by
Minister for Mines and Petroleum
Response time
42 days
Please refer to parliamentary question 2516.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.