❓ A WA parliamentary question seeks details about a Registered Training Organisation (RTO) issuing diplomas without proper accreditation. The Minister declines to answer due to an ongoing appeal, promising to respond after its conclusion.
AnsweredQoN 749Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
REGISTERED TRADING ORGANISATION — ISSUE OF DIPLOMAS
I refer to the minister’s answer yesterday to question without notice 726. (1) Which registered training organisation was issuing diplomas in project management when it did not have the scope to do so? (2) How many diplomas in project management were issued by this RTO, and over what period? (3) When was the matter brought to the attention of the Training Accreditation Council? (4) When was the investigation conducted and by whom, and was any penalty applied to the RTO? (5) Will the minister table the investigation and audit report; and, if not, why not? Hon PETER COLLIER
I refer to the minister’s answer yesterday to question without notice 726. (1) Which registered training organisation was issuing diplomas in project management when it did not have the scope to do so? (2) How many diplomas in project management were issued by this RTO, and over what period? (3) When was the matter brought to the attention of the Training Accreditation Council? (4) When was the investigation conducted and by whom, and was any penalty applied to the RTO? (5) Will the minister table the investigation and audit report; and, if not, why not? Hon PETER COLLIER
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. (1)–(5) This matter is the subject of an appeal. Therefore it would not be appropriate to respond to this question, as doing so may undermine the appeal process. I will say, however, that after the appeal process has been concluded—I have no idea when it will be concluded—I will not have any problems responding to the question.
(1) Which registered training organisation was issuing diplomas in project management when it did not have the scope to do so? (2) How many diplomas in project management were issued by this RTO, and over what period? (3) When was the matter brought to the attention of the Training Accreditation Council? (4) When was the investigation conducted and by whom, and was any penalty applied to the RTO? (5) Will the minister table the investigation and audit report; and, if not, why not? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. (1)–(5) This matter is the subject of an appeal. Therefore it would not be appropriate to respond to this question, as doing so may undermine the appeal process. I will say, however, that after the appeal process has been concluded—I have no idea when it will be concluded—I will not have any problems responding to the question.
(2) How many diplomas in project management were issued by this RTO, and over what period? (3) When was the matter brought to the attention of the Training Accreditation Council? (4) When was the investigation conducted and by whom, and was any penalty applied to the RTO? (5) Will the minister table the investigation and audit report; and, if not, why not? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. (1)–(5) This matter is the subject of an appeal. Therefore it would not be appropriate to respond to this question, as doing so may undermine the appeal process. I will say, however, that after the appeal process has been concluded—I have no idea when it will be concluded—I will not have any problems responding to the question.
(3) When was the matter brought to the attention of the Training Accreditation Council? (4) When was the investigation conducted and by whom, and was any penalty applied to the RTO? (5) Will the minister table the investigation and audit report; and, if not, why not? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. (1)–(5) This matter is the subject of an appeal. Therefore it would not be appropriate to respond to this question, as doing so may undermine the appeal process. I will say, however, that after the appeal process has been concluded—I have no idea when it will be concluded—I will not have any problems responding to the question.
(4) When was the investigation conducted and by whom, and was any penalty applied to the RTO? (5) Will the minister table the investigation and audit report; and, if not, why not? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. (1)–(5) This matter is the subject of an appeal. Therefore it would not be appropriate to respond to this question, as doing so may undermine the appeal process. I will say, however, that after the appeal process has been concluded—I have no idea when it will be concluded—I will not have any problems responding to the question.
(5) Will the minister table the investigation and audit report; and, if not, why not? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. (1)–(5) This matter is the subject of an appeal. Therefore it would not be appropriate to respond to this question, as doing so may undermine the appeal process. I will say, however, that after the appeal process has been concluded—I have no idea when it will be concluded—I will not have any problems responding to the question.
Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. (1)–(5) This matter is the subject of an appeal. Therefore it would not be appropriate to respond to this question, as doing so may undermine the appeal process. I will say, however, that after the appeal process has been concluded—I have no idea when it will be concluded—I will not have any problems responding to the question.
I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. (1)–(5) This matter is the subject of an appeal. Therefore it would not be appropriate to respond to this question, as doing so may undermine the appeal process. I will say, however, that after the appeal process has been concluded—I have no idea when it will be concluded—I will not have any problems responding to the question.
(1)–(5) This matter is the subject of an appeal. Therefore it would not be appropriate to respond to this question, as doing so may undermine the appeal process. I will say, however, that after the appeal process has been concluded—I have no idea when it will be concluded—I will not have any problems responding to the question.
(1) Which registered training organisation was issuing diplomas in project management when it did not have the scope to do so? (2) How many diplomas in project management were issued by this RTO, and over what period? (3) When was the matter brought to the attention of the Training Accreditation Council? (4) When was the investigation conducted and by whom, and was any penalty applied to the RTO? (5) Will the minister table the investigation and audit report; and, if not, why not? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. (1)–(5) This matter is the subject of an appeal. Therefore it would not be appropriate to respond to this question, as doing so may undermine the appeal process. I will say, however, that after the appeal process has been concluded—I have no idea when it will be concluded—I will not have any problems responding to the question.
(2) How many diplomas in project management were issued by this RTO, and over what period? (3) When was the matter brought to the attention of the Training Accreditation Council? (4) When was the investigation conducted and by whom, and was any penalty applied to the RTO? (5) Will the minister table the investigation and audit report; and, if not, why not? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. (1)–(5) This matter is the subject of an appeal. Therefore it would not be appropriate to respond to this question, as doing so may undermine the appeal process. I will say, however, that after the appeal process has been concluded—I have no idea when it will be concluded—I will not have any problems responding to the question.
(3) When was the matter brought to the attention of the Training Accreditation Council? (4) When was the investigation conducted and by whom, and was any penalty applied to the RTO? (5) Will the minister table the investigation and audit report; and, if not, why not? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. (1)–(5) This matter is the subject of an appeal. Therefore it would not be appropriate to respond to this question, as doing so may undermine the appeal process. I will say, however, that after the appeal process has been concluded—I have no idea when it will be concluded—I will not have any problems responding to the question.
(4) When was the investigation conducted and by whom, and was any penalty applied to the RTO? (5) Will the minister table the investigation and audit report; and, if not, why not? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. (1)–(5) This matter is the subject of an appeal. Therefore it would not be appropriate to respond to this question, as doing so may undermine the appeal process. I will say, however, that after the appeal process has been concluded—I have no idea when it will be concluded—I will not have any problems responding to the question.
(5) Will the minister table the investigation and audit report; and, if not, why not? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. (1)–(5) This matter is the subject of an appeal. Therefore it would not be appropriate to respond to this question, as doing so may undermine the appeal process. I will say, however, that after the appeal process has been concluded—I have no idea when it will be concluded—I will not have any problems responding to the question.
Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. (1)–(5) This matter is the subject of an appeal. Therefore it would not be appropriate to respond to this question, as doing so may undermine the appeal process. I will say, however, that after the appeal process has been concluded—I have no idea when it will be concluded—I will not have any problems responding to the question.
I thank the honourable member for some notice of the question. (1)–(5) This matter is the subject of an appeal. Therefore it would not be appropriate to respond to this question, as doing so may undermine the appeal process. I will say, however, that after the appeal process has been concluded—I have no idea when it will be concluded—I will not have any problems responding to the question.
(1)–(5) This matter is the subject of an appeal. Therefore it would not be appropriate to respond to this question, as doing so may undermine the appeal process. I will say, however, that after the appeal process has been concluded—I have no idea when it will be concluded—I will not have any problems responding to the question.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.