Hon Barry House questions the District Director's written instruction regarding a performance management review at Calista Primary School, specifically targeting the process and intent behind the review. The Minister declines to answer due to ongoing litigation.

AnsweredQoN 2525Legislative Council
Asked
17 August 2005
Portfolio
Education and Training

QuestionView source ↗

(1) Why did the District Director - Fremantle - Peel Education District, issue a written instruction on February 24 2004 to the Principal of the Calista Primary School, that he wished to conduct a review of the 2003-04 Performance Management ‘improvement targets’, that were designated as Discussion Point 2 and Discussion Point 7?
(2) Why has this written directive been issued, when previously these sorts of initial discussions have taken place over the telephone prior to any performance management review taken place?
(3) Can you provide an explanation of the intent of the following statement made by the District Director - ‘We also used a self-assessment matrix to capture your judgements about the performance of the school by using the Principles of the Curriculum Framework across six domains of school management’?
(4) Did this review take place?
(5) If so, what was the date and the outcome of this review?
(6) If this review did not take place, why not?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
14 September 2005
Responded by
Minister for Education and Training
Response time
28 days
(1) - (6) This is currently the subject of litigation and therefore it is not possible to respond to this question.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more