❓ A WA parliamentary question on notice requests the Attorney General to table documents related to legal fees for the Mallard and Beamish appeals. The Attorney General tables one document and refers to a previous question for another, but declines to provide details on individual recipients of government funding.
AnsweredQoN 832Legislative Council
Asked
26 September 2006
Member
Portfolio
parliamentary secretary representing the Attorney General
QuestionView source ↗
MALLARD AND BEAMISH CASES - LEGAL FEES
I refer the Attorney General to the appeals by Mr Mallard and Mr Beamish. (1) Will the Attorney General table the letter from Clayton Utz to the government dated 8 July 2005; and, if not, why not? (2) Did the government verify by any means Clayton Utz’s cost estimates for the Mallard appeal following the High Court case; and, if not, why not? (3) Will the Attorney General table the funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response concerning the appeal by Darryl Beamish; and, if not, why not? (4) Does the Attorney General have details about all individuals who received payment from the government’s funding to Clayton Utz and Dawson Davies? Hon SUE ELLERY
I refer the Attorney General to the appeals by Mr Mallard and Mr Beamish. (1) Will the Attorney General table the letter from Clayton Utz to the government dated 8 July 2005; and, if not, why not? (2) Did the government verify by any means Clayton Utz’s cost estimates for the Mallard appeal following the High Court case; and, if not, why not? (3) Will the Attorney General table the funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response concerning the appeal by Darryl Beamish; and, if not, why not? (4) Does the Attorney General have details about all individuals who received payment from the government’s funding to Clayton Utz and Dawson Davies? Hon SUE ELLERY
AnswerView source ↗
(1) Yes. I table a copy of the letter. [See paper 1929.] Hon SUE ELLERY : The answer continues - (2) Yes. (3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
(1) Will the Attorney General table the letter from Clayton Utz to the government dated 8 July 2005; and, if not, why not? (2) Did the government verify by any means Clayton Utz’s cost estimates for the Mallard appeal following the High Court case; and, if not, why not? (3) Will the Attorney General table the funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response concerning the appeal by Darryl Beamish; and, if not, why not? (4) Does the Attorney General have details about all individuals who received payment from the government’s funding to Clayton Utz and Dawson Davies? Hon SUE ELLERY replied: (1) Yes. I table a copy of the letter. [See paper 1929.] Hon SUE ELLERY : The answer continues - (2) Yes. (3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
(2) Did the government verify by any means Clayton Utz’s cost estimates for the Mallard appeal following the High Court case; and, if not, why not? (3) Will the Attorney General table the funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response concerning the appeal by Darryl Beamish; and, if not, why not? (4) Does the Attorney General have details about all individuals who received payment from the government’s funding to Clayton Utz and Dawson Davies? Hon SUE ELLERY replied: (1) Yes. I table a copy of the letter. [See paper 1929.] Hon SUE ELLERY : The answer continues - (2) Yes. (3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
(3) Will the Attorney General table the funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response concerning the appeal by Darryl Beamish; and, if not, why not? (4) Does the Attorney General have details about all individuals who received payment from the government’s funding to Clayton Utz and Dawson Davies? Hon SUE ELLERY replied: (1) Yes. I table a copy of the letter. [See paper 1929.] Hon SUE ELLERY : The answer continues - (2) Yes. (3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
(4) Does the Attorney General have details about all individuals who received payment from the government’s funding to Clayton Utz and Dawson Davies? Hon SUE ELLERY replied: (1) Yes. I table a copy of the letter. [See paper 1929.] Hon SUE ELLERY : The answer continues - (2) Yes. (3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
Hon SUE ELLERY replied: (1) Yes. I table a copy of the letter. [See paper 1929.] Hon SUE ELLERY : The answer continues - (2) Yes. (3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
(1) Yes. I table a copy of the letter. [See paper 1929.] Hon SUE ELLERY : The answer continues - (2) Yes. (3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
[See paper 1929.] Hon SUE ELLERY : The answer continues - (2) Yes. (3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
Hon SUE ELLERY : The answer continues - (2) Yes. (3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
(2) Yes. (3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
(3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
(4) No.
(1) Will the Attorney General table the letter from Clayton Utz to the government dated 8 July 2005; and, if not, why not? (2) Did the government verify by any means Clayton Utz’s cost estimates for the Mallard appeal following the High Court case; and, if not, why not? (3) Will the Attorney General table the funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response concerning the appeal by Darryl Beamish; and, if not, why not? (4) Does the Attorney General have details about all individuals who received payment from the government’s funding to Clayton Utz and Dawson Davies? Hon SUE ELLERY replied: (1) Yes. I table a copy of the letter. [See paper 1929.] Hon SUE ELLERY : The answer continues - (2) Yes. (3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
(2) Did the government verify by any means Clayton Utz’s cost estimates for the Mallard appeal following the High Court case; and, if not, why not? (3) Will the Attorney General table the funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response concerning the appeal by Darryl Beamish; and, if not, why not? (4) Does the Attorney General have details about all individuals who received payment from the government’s funding to Clayton Utz and Dawson Davies? Hon SUE ELLERY replied: (1) Yes. I table a copy of the letter. [See paper 1929.] Hon SUE ELLERY : The answer continues - (2) Yes. (3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
(3) Will the Attorney General table the funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response concerning the appeal by Darryl Beamish; and, if not, why not? (4) Does the Attorney General have details about all individuals who received payment from the government’s funding to Clayton Utz and Dawson Davies? Hon SUE ELLERY replied: (1) Yes. I table a copy of the letter. [See paper 1929.] Hon SUE ELLERY : The answer continues - (2) Yes. (3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
(4) Does the Attorney General have details about all individuals who received payment from the government’s funding to Clayton Utz and Dawson Davies? Hon SUE ELLERY replied: (1) Yes. I table a copy of the letter. [See paper 1929.] Hon SUE ELLERY : The answer continues - (2) Yes. (3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
Hon SUE ELLERY replied: (1) Yes. I table a copy of the letter. [See paper 1929.] Hon SUE ELLERY : The answer continues - (2) Yes. (3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
(1) Yes. I table a copy of the letter. [See paper 1929.] Hon SUE ELLERY : The answer continues - (2) Yes. (3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
[See paper 1929.] Hon SUE ELLERY : The answer continues - (2) Yes. (3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
Hon SUE ELLERY : The answer continues - (2) Yes. (3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
(2) Yes. (3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
(3) The funding request from Dawson Davies and the government’s response were tabled with the answer to parliamentary question without notice 793. See the answer to part (3). (4) No.
(4) No.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.