❓ Hon Barry House questions the State Government's support and funding for the Community Regional Herbarium Volunteer Program, revealing past funding levels and the government's intention to review funding periodically.
AnsweredQoN 304Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(1) Does the State Government support the Community Regional Herbarium Volunteer Program?
(2) What has been the level of funding in the past and what is the current level of funding?
(3) Will the Government continue to fund the program?
(4) If yes, will the Government -
(a) increase; or
(b) cut current funding; and
(c) by how much?
(5) If not, why not?
(2) What has been the level of funding in the past and what is the current level of funding?
(3) Will the Government continue to fund the program?
(4) If yes, will the Government -
(a) increase; or
(b) cut current funding; and
(c) by how much?
(5) If not, why not?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
17 December 2002
Responded by
Minister for Housing and Works representing the Minister for the Environment and Heritage
Response time
33 days
(b) cut current funding; and (c) by how much?
(c) by how much?
(2) Past and current levels of funding have been: Year NHT Department 1997/98 $128 668 $20 400 1998/99 $131 885 $20 400 1999/00 $132 482 $20 400 2000/01 $69 400 2001/02 $21 500 2002/03 $36 500 (3) The project has been scaled down commensurate with available funding and will continue to operate with currently available resources and substantial volunteer input. (4) (a, b & c) The level of State Government funding for this project, as with many other projects within the Department of Conservation and Land Management, will be periodically reviewed and assessed against other priority conservation projects. (5) Not applicable.
Year NHT Department 1997/98 $128 668 $20 400 1998/99 $131 885 $20 400 1999/00 $132 482 $20 400 2000/01 $69 400 2001/02 $21 500 2002/03 $36 500 (3) The project has been scaled down commensurate with available funding and will continue to operate with currently available resources and substantial volunteer input. (4) (a, b & c) The level of State Government funding for this project, as with many other projects within the Department of Conservation and Land Management, will be periodically reviewed and assessed against other priority conservation projects. (5) Not applicable.
(3) The project has been scaled down commensurate with available funding and will continue to operate with currently available resources and substantial volunteer input. (4) (a, b & c) The level of State Government funding for this project, as with many other projects within the Department of Conservation and Land Management, will be periodically reviewed and assessed against other priority conservation projects. (5) Not applicable.
(4) (a, b & c) The level of State Government funding for this project, as with many other projects within the Department of Conservation and Land Management, will be periodically reviewed and assessed against other priority conservation projects. (5) Not applicable.
(5) Not applicable.
(c) by how much?
(2) Past and current levels of funding have been: Year NHT Department 1997/98 $128 668 $20 400 1998/99 $131 885 $20 400 1999/00 $132 482 $20 400 2000/01 $69 400 2001/02 $21 500 2002/03 $36 500 (3) The project has been scaled down commensurate with available funding and will continue to operate with currently available resources and substantial volunteer input. (4) (a, b & c) The level of State Government funding for this project, as with many other projects within the Department of Conservation and Land Management, will be periodically reviewed and assessed against other priority conservation projects. (5) Not applicable.
Year NHT Department 1997/98 $128 668 $20 400 1998/99 $131 885 $20 400 1999/00 $132 482 $20 400 2000/01 $69 400 2001/02 $21 500 2002/03 $36 500 (3) The project has been scaled down commensurate with available funding and will continue to operate with currently available resources and substantial volunteer input. (4) (a, b & c) The level of State Government funding for this project, as with many other projects within the Department of Conservation and Land Management, will be periodically reviewed and assessed against other priority conservation projects. (5) Not applicable.
(3) The project has been scaled down commensurate with available funding and will continue to operate with currently available resources and substantial volunteer input. (4) (a, b & c) The level of State Government funding for this project, as with many other projects within the Department of Conservation and Land Management, will be periodically reviewed and assessed against other priority conservation projects. (5) Not applicable.
(4) (a, b & c) The level of State Government funding for this project, as with many other projects within the Department of Conservation and Land Management, will be periodically reviewed and assessed against other priority conservation projects. (5) Not applicable.
(5) Not applicable.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.