❓ Hon Colin Holt questions the Minister for Education and Training regarding the calculation of operating deficits for camp schools, seeking clarification on included costs and revenue. The Minister provides details on the calculation methodology and includes a table of total expenditure for each camp school over the past five years.
AnsweredQoN 249Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
CAMP SCHOOLS —
CLOSURE
249. Hon COLIN HOLT to the Minister for Education and
Training:
I refer to the minister's
answer to question without notice 141, asked in the Legislative Council on 22 March
2018, in relation to camp school funding.
(1) Can the minister outline how the
operating deficits were calculated?
(2) Do these
figures include the salary and cash flow in, and the returned revenue from, for
each camp school?
(3) Do the figures in the table also
include camp project programs?
(4) If yes to (3), how were the 2017
operating deficits calculated?
(5) What is the operating cost for
each of the seven camp schools for the last five years?
CLOSURE
249. Hon COLIN HOLT to the Minister for Education and
Training:
I refer to the minister's
answer to question without notice 141, asked in the Legislative Council on 22 March
2018, in relation to camp school funding.
(1) Can the minister outline how the
operating deficits were calculated?
(2) Do these
figures include the salary and cash flow in, and the returned revenue from, for
each camp school?
(3) Do the figures in the table also
include camp project programs?
(4) If yes to (3), how were the 2017
operating deficits calculated?
(5) What is the operating cost for
each of the seven camp schools for the last five years?
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the honourable member for
some notice of the question.
(1) The operating
deficit reflects the difference between the total expenditure of the camp
schools, excluding expenditure incurred centrally, and locally raised revenue
such as fees.
(2) The
calculation includes salary costs within the camp school's total expenditure,
and the income generated by the camp school is reflected in the calculation
under locally raised revenue. However, the calculation excludes the payment of
revenue remitted back to the Department of Education, funding to camp schools
from the department, the transfer of funding between schools and the transfer
of funds to reserves. Expenditure incurred centrally by the department on
behalf of the camp schools has also been excluded, and this includes
depreciation costs.
(3) The department is unaware of
what is meant by ''camp project'' programs.
(4) Not applicable.
(5) This answer is in
tabular form and I seek leave to have it incorporated into Hansard .
Leave granted.
The
following material was incorporated —
School
2013
Total Expenditure
2014
Total Expenditure
2015
Total Expenditure
2016
Total Expenditure
2017
Total Expenditure
Bridgetown Camp School
$707 703
$827 375
$965 950
$918 984
$1 078 374
Broome Camp School
$870 435
$1 052 771
$1 250 393
$1 212 362
$1 387 764
Pilbara Camp School
$726 180
$769 393
$853 923
$704 194
$788 958
Geraldton Camp School
$654 477
$652 756
$786 292
$791 162
$883 491
Goldfields Camp School
$868 718
$795 682
$1 112 163
$1 062 644
$1 136 209
Pemberton Camp School
$634 804
$685 469
$738 758
$681 069
$674 635
Point Peron Camp School
$1 152 355
$1 333 465
$1 323 501
$1 558 994
$1 398 426
Total
$5 614 672
$6 116 909
$7 030 981
$6 929 409
$7 347 857
The
total amounts in the table may not sum to the individual camp figures due to
rounding
some notice of the question.
(1) The operating
deficit reflects the difference between the total expenditure of the camp
schools, excluding expenditure incurred centrally, and locally raised revenue
such as fees.
(2) The
calculation includes salary costs within the camp school's total expenditure,
and the income generated by the camp school is reflected in the calculation
under locally raised revenue. However, the calculation excludes the payment of
revenue remitted back to the Department of Education, funding to camp schools
from the department, the transfer of funding between schools and the transfer
of funds to reserves. Expenditure incurred centrally by the department on
behalf of the camp schools has also been excluded, and this includes
depreciation costs.
(3) The department is unaware of
what is meant by ''camp project'' programs.
(4) Not applicable.
(5) This answer is in
tabular form and I seek leave to have it incorporated into Hansard .
Leave granted.
The
following material was incorporated —
School
2013
Total Expenditure
2014
Total Expenditure
2015
Total Expenditure
2016
Total Expenditure
2017
Total Expenditure
Bridgetown Camp School
$707 703
$827 375
$965 950
$918 984
$1 078 374
Broome Camp School
$870 435
$1 052 771
$1 250 393
$1 212 362
$1 387 764
Pilbara Camp School
$726 180
$769 393
$853 923
$704 194
$788 958
Geraldton Camp School
$654 477
$652 756
$786 292
$791 162
$883 491
Goldfields Camp School
$868 718
$795 682
$1 112 163
$1 062 644
$1 136 209
Pemberton Camp School
$634 804
$685 469
$738 758
$681 069
$674 635
Point Peron Camp School
$1 152 355
$1 333 465
$1 323 501
$1 558 994
$1 398 426
Total
$5 614 672
$6 116 909
$7 030 981
$6 929 409
$7 347 857
The
total amounts in the table may not sum to the individual camp figures due to
rounding
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.