Question on Notice regarding discrepancies in demand modelling and funding allocation for child protection services, specifically concerning Outcomes 2 and 3, including sunset clauses and funding values. The answer provides clarifications on demand forecasting, service areas, and funding reallocations.

AnsweredQoN 4401Legislative Council
Asked
14 September 2016
Portfolio
Child Protection

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to supplementary
information A67, provided during the 2016-17 Budget Estimates hearings, to explain a reduction
in demand of funding for services, and I ask: (a) the demand model predicted a growth in the number of
children in care during 2014-15 as 6.1% and the actual growth was 6.3%, please explain how
this equates to a reduction in demand; (b) what are the policy and service summary areas of
"Outcome 2" on the attachment to A67 titled "Note for the Minister only"; (c) in regard to "Outcome 2" on the attachment to A67, the model predicted a
growth in demand of 7.1% and the actual growth funded was 0.2%, what is the explanation for this variance; (d) what is the full list of programs under "Outcome 3" listed on the attachment to A67, that were under this outcome but are now subject to a "sunset clause" requiring an individual resubmitted
budget bid; (e) what was the value of funding allocated to "Outcome 3" before funding was "zeroed" out; and (f) what is the value of funding and programs that now remain under "Outcome 3"?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
19 October 2016
Responded by
Minister for Planning representing the Minister for Child Protection
Response time
35 days
(a) That is correct this is not a reduction from the predicted growth for this outcome.
(b) The main service areas for Outcome 2 in 2014-15 were as follows:
(c) The demand for services, as forecasted by the Demand model, was lower than anticipated because of a reduction in the interactions with the Department that required a child protection response.
(d) Only at-risk youth services were subject to a sunset clause. This has subsequently been removed from these services.
(e) The total demand funding allocation with application of the Outcome 3 demand driver to Outcome 3 was $21.6 million.
(f) The value and funding for programs currently under Outcome 1 Family Support Services (formally Outcome 3) is as follows:
2016-17
Budget
Estimate
$’000

$’000
Homelessness Services
51,984
Responsible Parenting Services.
22,079
At Risk Youth Services
13,063
Family Support Services
37,950
125,076

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more