Mr Ripper asks the Premier if there's a greater benefit than unconditional support, implying the Premier sought this from the member for Fremantle. The Premier denies seeking any benefit.

AnsweredQoN 683Legislative Assembly
Asked
10 November 2010
Portfolio
Premier

QuestionView source ↗

GOVERNMENT RESOURCING — MINOR PARTIES AND INDEPENDENTS
I have a supplementary question. Can the Premier conceive of a greater benefit that a government could procure than for any member to undertake to support them, irrespective of what they may do or fail to do, however wrong or corrupt or negligent they may ever prove to be? Is that not the type of benefit that the Premier sought from the member for Fremantle; that is, a very large benefit for this government? Mr C.J. BARNETT

AnswerView source ↗

The answer to that is no. I sought no benefit from the member for Fremantle.
Mr C.J. BARNETT replied: The answer to that is no. I sought no benefit from the member for Fremantle.
The answer to that is no. I sought no benefit from the member for Fremantle.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more