❓ Hon. George Cash questions the Minister for Racing and Gaming about the confiscation of evidence-of-age documents by licensed premises, focusing on authorisation, security, and guidelines. The Minister admits she doesn't know the details and takes the question on notice.
AnsweredQoN 811Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
DRIVERS’ LICENCES - CONFISCATION BY LICENSED PREMISES
I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, of which some notice was given, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act. (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? I ask this question without notice, as I am following up the answer the minister gave me to the question I asked yesterday. Hon Sue Ellery : How would she know that? Hon GEORGE CASH : The minister does not have to know it all. All she need do is take the question on board and recognise that there is a significant problem associated with the confiscation of people’s licences. Hon Sue Ellery : Thanks for the editorial. Hon GEORGE CASH : The parliamentary secretary asked the question by interjection. If she wants to answer the question on behalf of the minister, she should just say so. Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH
I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, of which some notice was given, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act. (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? I ask this question without notice, as I am following up the answer the minister gave me to the question I asked yesterday. Hon Sue Ellery : How would she know that? Hon GEORGE CASH : The minister does not have to know it all. All she need do is take the question on board and recognise that there is a significant problem associated with the confiscation of people’s licences. Hon Sue Ellery : Thanks for the editorial. Hon GEORGE CASH : The parliamentary secretary asked the question by interjection. If she wants to answer the question on behalf of the minister, she should just say so. Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH
AnswerView source ↗
(1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
(1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? I ask this question without notice, as I am following up the answer the minister gave me to the question I asked yesterday. Hon Sue Ellery : How would she know that? Hon GEORGE CASH : The minister does not have to know it all. All she need do is take the question on board and recognise that there is a significant problem associated with the confiscation of people’s licences. Hon Sue Ellery : Thanks for the editorial. Hon GEORGE CASH : The parliamentary secretary asked the question by interjection. If she wants to answer the question on behalf of the minister, she should just say so. Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
(2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? I ask this question without notice, as I am following up the answer the minister gave me to the question I asked yesterday. Hon Sue Ellery : How would she know that? Hon GEORGE CASH : The minister does not have to know it all. All she need do is take the question on board and recognise that there is a significant problem associated with the confiscation of people’s licences. Hon Sue Ellery : Thanks for the editorial. Hon GEORGE CASH : The parliamentary secretary asked the question by interjection. If she wants to answer the question on behalf of the minister, she should just say so. Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
(3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? I ask this question without notice, as I am following up the answer the minister gave me to the question I asked yesterday. Hon Sue Ellery : How would she know that? Hon GEORGE CASH : The minister does not have to know it all. All she need do is take the question on board and recognise that there is a significant problem associated with the confiscation of people’s licences. Hon Sue Ellery : Thanks for the editorial. Hon GEORGE CASH : The parliamentary secretary asked the question by interjection. If she wants to answer the question on behalf of the minister, she should just say so. Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
I ask this question without notice, as I am following up the answer the minister gave me to the question I asked yesterday. Hon Sue Ellery : How would she know that? Hon GEORGE CASH : The minister does not have to know it all. All she need do is take the question on board and recognise that there is a significant problem associated with the confiscation of people’s licences. Hon Sue Ellery : Thanks for the editorial. Hon GEORGE CASH : The parliamentary secretary asked the question by interjection. If she wants to answer the question on behalf of the minister, she should just say so. Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon Sue Ellery : How would she know that? Hon GEORGE CASH : The minister does not have to know it all. All she need do is take the question on board and recognise that there is a significant problem associated with the confiscation of people’s licences. Hon Sue Ellery : Thanks for the editorial. Hon GEORGE CASH : The parliamentary secretary asked the question by interjection. If she wants to answer the question on behalf of the minister, she should just say so. Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon GEORGE CASH : The minister does not have to know it all. All she need do is take the question on board and recognise that there is a significant problem associated with the confiscation of people’s licences. Hon Sue Ellery : Thanks for the editorial. Hon GEORGE CASH : The parliamentary secretary asked the question by interjection. If she wants to answer the question on behalf of the minister, she should just say so. Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon Sue Ellery : Thanks for the editorial. Hon GEORGE CASH : The parliamentary secretary asked the question by interjection. If she wants to answer the question on behalf of the minister, she should just say so. Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon GEORGE CASH : The parliamentary secretary asked the question by interjection. If she wants to answer the question on behalf of the minister, she should just say so. Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
(1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
(2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
(3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
(1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
(1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? I ask this question without notice, as I am following up the answer the minister gave me to the question I asked yesterday. Hon Sue Ellery : How would she know that? Hon GEORGE CASH : The minister does not have to know it all. All she need do is take the question on board and recognise that there is a significant problem associated with the confiscation of people’s licences. Hon Sue Ellery : Thanks for the editorial. Hon GEORGE CASH : The parliamentary secretary asked the question by interjection. If she wants to answer the question on behalf of the minister, she should just say so. Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
(2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? I ask this question without notice, as I am following up the answer the minister gave me to the question I asked yesterday. Hon Sue Ellery : How would she know that? Hon GEORGE CASH : The minister does not have to know it all. All she need do is take the question on board and recognise that there is a significant problem associated with the confiscation of people’s licences. Hon Sue Ellery : Thanks for the editorial. Hon GEORGE CASH : The parliamentary secretary asked the question by interjection. If she wants to answer the question on behalf of the minister, she should just say so. Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
(3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? I ask this question without notice, as I am following up the answer the minister gave me to the question I asked yesterday. Hon Sue Ellery : How would she know that? Hon GEORGE CASH : The minister does not have to know it all. All she need do is take the question on board and recognise that there is a significant problem associated with the confiscation of people’s licences. Hon Sue Ellery : Thanks for the editorial. Hon GEORGE CASH : The parliamentary secretary asked the question by interjection. If she wants to answer the question on behalf of the minister, she should just say so. Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
I ask this question without notice, as I am following up the answer the minister gave me to the question I asked yesterday. Hon Sue Ellery : How would she know that? Hon GEORGE CASH : The minister does not have to know it all. All she need do is take the question on board and recognise that there is a significant problem associated with the confiscation of people’s licences. Hon Sue Ellery : Thanks for the editorial. Hon GEORGE CASH : The parliamentary secretary asked the question by interjection. If she wants to answer the question on behalf of the minister, she should just say so. Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon Sue Ellery : How would she know that? Hon GEORGE CASH : The minister does not have to know it all. All she need do is take the question on board and recognise that there is a significant problem associated with the confiscation of people’s licences. Hon Sue Ellery : Thanks for the editorial. Hon GEORGE CASH : The parliamentary secretary asked the question by interjection. If she wants to answer the question on behalf of the minister, she should just say so. Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon GEORGE CASH : The minister does not have to know it all. All she need do is take the question on board and recognise that there is a significant problem associated with the confiscation of people’s licences. Hon Sue Ellery : Thanks for the editorial. Hon GEORGE CASH : The parliamentary secretary asked the question by interjection. If she wants to answer the question on behalf of the minister, she should just say so. Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon Sue Ellery : Thanks for the editorial. Hon GEORGE CASH : The parliamentary secretary asked the question by interjection. If she wants to answer the question on behalf of the minister, she should just say so. Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon GEORGE CASH : The parliamentary secretary asked the question by interjection. If she wants to answer the question on behalf of the minister, she should just say so. Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon Sue Ellery : No. What I asked was: how could you expect her to know all of that? Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon GEORGE CASH : If the parliamentary secretary thinks that bouncers should be able to take licences off people and not hand them in and if that is the government’s policy, she should tell me. However, I am asking the minister to listen to the question and to take it on board. The minister was asked a question yesterday and she provided me with an answer. Let us see whether she can add to it. Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon Ljiljanna Ravlich : Can Hon George Cash reread that question, please? Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon GEORGE CASH : I refer to the answer that the minister provided yesterday to question without notice 777, and in particular to the reference to section 126(2a) of the Liquor Control Act and ask - (1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
(1) On how many occasions have persons been authorised to confiscate an evidence-of-age document? (2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
(2) What security procedures does the Department of Racing, Gaming and Liquor have in place to prevent a confiscated evidence-of-age document being used for security theft or fraud? (3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
(3) What written instruction or criteria sets out the conditions and elements necessary to be present before an authorised person can confiscate an evidence-of-age document? Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH replied: (1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
(1)-(3) With all the best will in the world, honourable member, I am not across the detail of that. Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon George Cash : That’s fair enough. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I am more than happy to take that question on notice. Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon George Cash : It’s a serious matter. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : It is a serious matter. Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon George Cash : Because people are confiscating documents and not handing them in. Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Hon LJILJANNA RAVLICH : I do not dispute that it is a serious matter. The first time the matter came to my attention was in the question that Hon George Cash asked yesterday. Quite clearly Hon George Cash would like some answers and I am more than happy to ask the department to have a look at this issue and get those answers.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.