❓ A parliamentary question regarding Western Power employee remuneration reviews, including the number of employees reviewed, the process, and changes to remuneration. All 1361 employees reviewed were under individual agreements, with an average pay increase of 2%.
AnsweredQoN 1176Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
WESTERN POWER — EMPLOYEE REMUNERATION REVIEWS
I refer to recent remuneration reviews conducted by Western Power for some employees. (1) How many employees were subject to a remuneration review? (2) Who conducts these assessments? (3) Were these assessments subject to any cap on remuneration increases; and, if so, what was it? (4) Of these employees, how many are employed under individual agreements? (5) How many remuneration reviews resulted in an unchanged or reduced total fixed remuneration? (6) What was the average change in total fixed remuneration across these employees? Hon PETER COLLIER
I refer to recent remuneration reviews conducted by Western Power for some employees. (1) How many employees were subject to a remuneration review? (2) Who conducts these assessments? (3) Were these assessments subject to any cap on remuneration increases; and, if so, what was it? (4) Of these employees, how many are employed under individual agreements? (5) How many remuneration reviews resulted in an unchanged or reduced total fixed remuneration? (6) What was the average change in total fixed remuneration across these employees? Hon PETER COLLIER
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The number of employees subject to a remuneration review was 1 361. (2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(1) How many employees were subject to a remuneration review? (2) Who conducts these assessments? (3) Were these assessments subject to any cap on remuneration increases; and, if so, what was it? (4) Of these employees, how many are employed under individual agreements? (5) How many remuneration reviews resulted in an unchanged or reduced total fixed remuneration? (6) What was the average change in total fixed remuneration across these employees? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The number of employees subject to a remuneration review was 1 361. (2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(2) Who conducts these assessments? (3) Were these assessments subject to any cap on remuneration increases; and, if so, what was it? (4) Of these employees, how many are employed under individual agreements? (5) How many remuneration reviews resulted in an unchanged or reduced total fixed remuneration? (6) What was the average change in total fixed remuneration across these employees? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The number of employees subject to a remuneration review was 1 361. (2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(3) Were these assessments subject to any cap on remuneration increases; and, if so, what was it? (4) Of these employees, how many are employed under individual agreements? (5) How many remuneration reviews resulted in an unchanged or reduced total fixed remuneration? (6) What was the average change in total fixed remuneration across these employees? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The number of employees subject to a remuneration review was 1 361. (2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(4) Of these employees, how many are employed under individual agreements? (5) How many remuneration reviews resulted in an unchanged or reduced total fixed remuneration? (6) What was the average change in total fixed remuneration across these employees? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The number of employees subject to a remuneration review was 1 361. (2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(5) How many remuneration reviews resulted in an unchanged or reduced total fixed remuneration? (6) What was the average change in total fixed remuneration across these employees? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The number of employees subject to a remuneration review was 1 361. (2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(6) What was the average change in total fixed remuneration across these employees? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The number of employees subject to a remuneration review was 1 361. (2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The number of employees subject to a remuneration review was 1 361. (2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The number of employees subject to a remuneration review was 1 361. (2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(1) The number of employees subject to a remuneration review was 1 361. (2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(6) The average change was two per cent.
(1) How many employees were subject to a remuneration review? (2) Who conducts these assessments? (3) Were these assessments subject to any cap on remuneration increases; and, if so, what was it? (4) Of these employees, how many are employed under individual agreements? (5) How many remuneration reviews resulted in an unchanged or reduced total fixed remuneration? (6) What was the average change in total fixed remuneration across these employees? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The number of employees subject to a remuneration review was 1 361. (2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(2) Who conducts these assessments? (3) Were these assessments subject to any cap on remuneration increases; and, if so, what was it? (4) Of these employees, how many are employed under individual agreements? (5) How many remuneration reviews resulted in an unchanged or reduced total fixed remuneration? (6) What was the average change in total fixed remuneration across these employees? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The number of employees subject to a remuneration review was 1 361. (2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(3) Were these assessments subject to any cap on remuneration increases; and, if so, what was it? (4) Of these employees, how many are employed under individual agreements? (5) How many remuneration reviews resulted in an unchanged or reduced total fixed remuneration? (6) What was the average change in total fixed remuneration across these employees? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The number of employees subject to a remuneration review was 1 361. (2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(4) Of these employees, how many are employed under individual agreements? (5) How many remuneration reviews resulted in an unchanged or reduced total fixed remuneration? (6) What was the average change in total fixed remuneration across these employees? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The number of employees subject to a remuneration review was 1 361. (2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(5) How many remuneration reviews resulted in an unchanged or reduced total fixed remuneration? (6) What was the average change in total fixed remuneration across these employees? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The number of employees subject to a remuneration review was 1 361. (2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(6) What was the average change in total fixed remuneration across these employees? Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The number of employees subject to a remuneration review was 1 361. (2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
Hon PETER COLLIER replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The number of employees subject to a remuneration review was 1 361. (2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) The number of employees subject to a remuneration review was 1 361. (2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(1) The number of employees subject to a remuneration review was 1 361. (2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(2) It is the formal leader, acting within an established performance-based appraisal system and remuneration policy. (3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(3) No. (4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(4) Of these employees listed in (1), the number employed under individual agreements is 1 361. (5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(5) The total fixed remuneration of 358 employees remained unchanged. No employees received a reduction in TFR. (6) The average change was two per cent.
(6) The average change was two per cent.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.