❓ A WA parliamentary question seeks information on disability services contracts, specifically regarding salaries, contract rollovers, and performance reviews for public servants in 2001 and 2005. The response provides data on the number of contracts, salary levels, rollover practices, and performance review documentation.
AnsweredQoN 2852Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
(c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
(c) $200 000, for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
for 2001 and 2005 were on contract at the above annualised salary level, but were permanent public servants at an annualised salary of less than $100 000?
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
(c) $200 000, had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
had their contracts rolled over in the past five years?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
15 March 2006
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Disability Services
Response time
127 days
(b) $150 000; and (c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
(c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
2001 - Nil. 2005 - six public servants on contract of which three were permanent public servants on an annualised salary of less than $100,000. 1 (b) 2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 1 (c) 2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 2 (a) Six public servants on contract of which three had their contracts rolled over in the past five years. 2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
2005 - six public servants on contract of which three were permanent public servants on an annualised salary of less than $100,000. 1 (b) 2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 1 (c) 2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 2 (a) Six public servants on contract of which three had their contracts rolled over in the past five years. 2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
1 (b) 2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 1 (c) 2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 2 (a) Six public servants on contract of which three had their contracts rolled over in the past five years. 2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 1 (c) 2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 2 (a) Six public servants on contract of which three had their contracts rolled over in the past five years. 2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
2005 - Nil. 1 (c) 2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 2 (a) Six public servants on contract of which three had their contracts rolled over in the past five years. 2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
1 (c) 2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 2 (a) Six public servants on contract of which three had their contracts rolled over in the past five years. 2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 2 (a) Six public servants on contract of which three had their contracts rolled over in the past five years. 2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
2005 - Nil. 2 (a) Six public servants on contract of which three had their contracts rolled over in the past five years. 2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
2 (a) Six public servants on contract of which three had their contracts rolled over in the past five years. 2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
(c) $200 000, have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
have had a fully documented annual performance review, with a documented annual performance report, during the past two years?
2001 - Nil. 2005 - six public servants on contract of which three were permanent public servants on an annualised salary of less than $100,000. 1 (b) 2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 1 (c) 2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 2 (a) Six public servants on contract of which three had their contracts rolled over in the past five years. 2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
2005 - six public servants on contract of which three were permanent public servants on an annualised salary of less than $100,000. 1 (b) 2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 1 (c) 2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 2 (a) Six public servants on contract of which three had their contracts rolled over in the past five years. 2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
1 (b) 2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 1 (c) 2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 2 (a) Six public servants on contract of which three had their contracts rolled over in the past five years. 2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 1 (c) 2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 2 (a) Six public servants on contract of which three had their contracts rolled over in the past five years. 2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
2005 - Nil. 1 (c) 2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 2 (a) Six public servants on contract of which three had their contracts rolled over in the past five years. 2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
1 (c) 2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 2 (a) Six public servants on contract of which three had their contracts rolled over in the past five years. 2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
2001 - Nil. 2005 - Nil. 2 (a) Six public servants on contract of which three had their contracts rolled over in the past five years. 2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
2005 - Nil. 2 (a) Six public servants on contract of which three had their contracts rolled over in the past five years. 2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
2 (a) Six public servants on contract of which three had their contracts rolled over in the past five years. 2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
2 (b) Not applicable. 2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
2 (c) One public servant had her contract rolled over in the past five years. 3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
3 None of the four public servants who had their contracts rolled over in the past five years had to reapply in open competition. 4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
4 (a) Six public servants on contract, of which all six had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years. 4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
4 (b) Not applicable. 4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
4 (c) One public servant had a fully documented annual performance report during the past two years.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.