❓ Mr. Day questions the sale of two lots by Main Roads WA, inquiring about the sale price, reasons for sale, and whether they were needed for the Great Eastern Highway widening. The Minister confirms the sale, prices, reason for sale and that the land was not required for the highway widening.
AnsweredQoN 574Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(b) which government agency previously owned the lots; (c) how much was obtained for each lot; (d) why were they sold; and (e) were the lots required for any part of the proposed widening of Great Eastern Highway?
(c) how much was obtained for each lot; (d) why were they sold; and (e) were the lots required for any part of the proposed widening of Great Eastern Highway?
(d) why were they sold; and (e) were the lots required for any part of the proposed widening of Great Eastern Highway?
(e) were the lots required for any part of the proposed widening of Great Eastern Highway?
(2) Main Roads Western Australia (3) Lot 111 - $592 000: Lot 112 - $277 000 (4) The properties were surplus to requirements (5) No. The portion required for the future widening of Great Eastern Highway were excised prior to the sale
(3) Lot 111 - $592 000: Lot 112 - $277 000 (4) The properties were surplus to requirements (5) No. The portion required for the future widening of Great Eastern Highway were excised prior to the sale
(4) The properties were surplus to requirements (5) No. The portion required for the future widening of Great Eastern Highway were excised prior to the sale
(5) No. The portion required for the future widening of Great Eastern Highway were excised prior to the sale
(c) how much was obtained for each lot; (d) why were they sold; and (e) were the lots required for any part of the proposed widening of Great Eastern Highway?
(d) why were they sold; and (e) were the lots required for any part of the proposed widening of Great Eastern Highway?
(e) were the lots required for any part of the proposed widening of Great Eastern Highway?
(2) Main Roads Western Australia (3) Lot 111 - $592 000: Lot 112 - $277 000 (4) The properties were surplus to requirements (5) No. The portion required for the future widening of Great Eastern Highway were excised prior to the sale
(3) Lot 111 - $592 000: Lot 112 - $277 000 (4) The properties were surplus to requirements (5) No. The portion required for the future widening of Great Eastern Highway were excised prior to the sale
(4) The properties were surplus to requirements (5) No. The portion required for the future widening of Great Eastern Highway were excised prior to the sale
(5) No. The portion required for the future widening of Great Eastern Highway were excised prior to the sale
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
28 March 2006
Responded by
Minister for Planning and Infrastructure
Response time
21 days
(1) Two
(2) Main Roads Western Australia
(3) Lot 111 - $592 000: Lot 112 - $277 000
(4) The properties were surplus to requirements
(5) No. The portion required for the future widening of Great Eastern Highway were excised prior to the sale
(2) Main Roads Western Australia
(3) Lot 111 - $592 000: Lot 112 - $277 000
(4) The properties were surplus to requirements
(5) No. The portion required for the future widening of Great Eastern Highway were excised prior to the sale
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.