❓ A WA parliamentary question on notice regarding concerns about residential development near Parkeston, an area identified for intensified industrial activity, and its proximity to mining and the Ninga Mia Aboriginal community. The question seeks specific dates, distances, and a review of a lease.
AnsweredQoN 546Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to a letter dated February 15 2002 titled ‘Hampton Location 191’ signed by Shelley Brindal, A/Project Officer, South East Region Land Administration Services Branch, Department of Land Administration -
(1) Can the Minister state what are those concerns with residential development, including a caravan being in such close proximity to Parkeston, which has been identified as a site for intensified industrial activity?
(2) If not, why not?
(3) Can the Minister state how far in metres is Hampton Location 191 from Parkeston?
(4) If not, why not?
(5) Can the Minister state how far in metres is Hampton Location 191 to mining activity and what is the specific mining activity which is being undertaken?
(6) If not, why not?
(7) Can the Minister give the specific date in which Parkeston was identified as a site for intensified industrial activity?
(8) If not, why not?
(9) Can the Minister give the specific date on which Hampton Location 191 and the lease was first issued by the Department of Land Administration?
(10) If not, why not?
(11) Can the Minister provide a scaled map showing the position of Hampton Location 191, the Parkeston area identified as a intensified industrial activity and the close mining activity?
(12) If not, why not?
(13) Can the Minister state how many residential houses there are in Parkeston?
(14) If not, why not?
(15) Can the Minister state how far in metres is Parkeston from the Ninga Mia Aboriginal community and how many residential houses are in this community?
(16) If not, why not?
(17) Can the Department of Land Administration review the entire matter with a view to issuing a lease to Mr Paul Stokes given that ceasing occupation and use of the land will cause severe unnecessary hardship to the person?
(18) If not, why not?
(1) Can the Minister state what are those concerns with residential development, including a caravan being in such close proximity to Parkeston, which has been identified as a site for intensified industrial activity?
(2) If not, why not?
(3) Can the Minister state how far in metres is Hampton Location 191 from Parkeston?
(4) If not, why not?
(5) Can the Minister state how far in metres is Hampton Location 191 to mining activity and what is the specific mining activity which is being undertaken?
(6) If not, why not?
(7) Can the Minister give the specific date in which Parkeston was identified as a site for intensified industrial activity?
(8) If not, why not?
(9) Can the Minister give the specific date on which Hampton Location 191 and the lease was first issued by the Department of Land Administration?
(10) If not, why not?
(11) Can the Minister provide a scaled map showing the position of Hampton Location 191, the Parkeston area identified as a intensified industrial activity and the close mining activity?
(12) If not, why not?
(13) Can the Minister state how many residential houses there are in Parkeston?
(14) If not, why not?
(15) Can the Minister state how far in metres is Parkeston from the Ninga Mia Aboriginal community and how many residential houses are in this community?
(16) If not, why not?
(17) Can the Department of Land Administration review the entire matter with a view to issuing a lease to Mr Paul Stokes given that ceasing occupation and use of the land will cause severe unnecessary hardship to the person?
(18) If not, why not?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
14 May 2002
Responded by
Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Planning and Infrastructure
Response time
35 days
DOLA understands that the objectives of the rural zone are to provide for the development of rural activity and for the development of mining activity as appropriate. This protects the land from urban uses that may jeopardise the future use of the land for priority mining and rural uses, and accommodates the development of isolated communities, including Aboriginal and railway settlements. The City has concerns about any form of residential development in close proximity to Parkeston, an area which has been identified for intensified general industrial activity. Any form of residential development on Location 191 could impact on nearby mining activities. (2) Not applicable. (3) Approximately 2,500 metres from Parkeston Railway Station. (4) Not applicable. (5) Approximately 400 metres from tailing ponds. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8) The area is zoned Railway and its current use is industrial associated with railway purposes. (9) Lease commenced 10 May 1990 for a term of 21 years for the purpose of Motor Cycle Track. (10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
The City has concerns about any form of residential development in close proximity to Parkeston, an area which has been identified for intensified general industrial activity. Any form of residential development on Location 191 could impact on nearby mining activities. (2) Not applicable. (3) Approximately 2,500 metres from Parkeston Railway Station. (4) Not applicable. (5) Approximately 400 metres from tailing ponds. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8) The area is zoned Railway and its current use is industrial associated with railway purposes. (9) Lease commenced 10 May 1990 for a term of 21 years for the purpose of Motor Cycle Track. (10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(2) Not applicable. (3) Approximately 2,500 metres from Parkeston Railway Station. (4) Not applicable. (5) Approximately 400 metres from tailing ponds. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8) The area is zoned Railway and its current use is industrial associated with railway purposes. (9) Lease commenced 10 May 1990 for a term of 21 years for the purpose of Motor Cycle Track. (10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(3) Approximately 2,500 metres from Parkeston Railway Station. (4) Not applicable. (5) Approximately 400 metres from tailing ponds. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8) The area is zoned Railway and its current use is industrial associated with railway purposes. (9) Lease commenced 10 May 1990 for a term of 21 years for the purpose of Motor Cycle Track. (10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(4) Not applicable. (5) Approximately 400 metres from tailing ponds. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8) The area is zoned Railway and its current use is industrial associated with railway purposes. (9) Lease commenced 10 May 1990 for a term of 21 years for the purpose of Motor Cycle Track. (10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(5) Approximately 400 metres from tailing ponds. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8) The area is zoned Railway and its current use is industrial associated with railway purposes. (9) Lease commenced 10 May 1990 for a term of 21 years for the purpose of Motor Cycle Track. (10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8) The area is zoned Railway and its current use is industrial associated with railway purposes. (9) Lease commenced 10 May 1990 for a term of 21 years for the purpose of Motor Cycle Track. (10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(7) No. (8) The area is zoned Railway and its current use is industrial associated with railway purposes. (9) Lease commenced 10 May 1990 for a term of 21 years for the purpose of Motor Cycle Track. (10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(8) The area is zoned Railway and its current use is industrial associated with railway purposes. (9) Lease commenced 10 May 1990 for a term of 21 years for the purpose of Motor Cycle Track. (10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(9) Lease commenced 10 May 1990 for a term of 21 years for the purpose of Motor Cycle Track. (10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(18) See answer 1.
The City has concerns about any form of residential development in close proximity to Parkeston, an area which has been identified for intensified general industrial activity. Any form of residential development on Location 191 could impact on nearby mining activities. (2) Not applicable. (3) Approximately 2,500 metres from Parkeston Railway Station. (4) Not applicable. (5) Approximately 400 metres from tailing ponds. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8) The area is zoned Railway and its current use is industrial associated with railway purposes. (9) Lease commenced 10 May 1990 for a term of 21 years for the purpose of Motor Cycle Track. (10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(2) Not applicable. (3) Approximately 2,500 metres from Parkeston Railway Station. (4) Not applicable. (5) Approximately 400 metres from tailing ponds. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8) The area is zoned Railway and its current use is industrial associated with railway purposes. (9) Lease commenced 10 May 1990 for a term of 21 years for the purpose of Motor Cycle Track. (10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(3) Approximately 2,500 metres from Parkeston Railway Station. (4) Not applicable. (5) Approximately 400 metres from tailing ponds. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8) The area is zoned Railway and its current use is industrial associated with railway purposes. (9) Lease commenced 10 May 1990 for a term of 21 years for the purpose of Motor Cycle Track. (10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(4) Not applicable. (5) Approximately 400 metres from tailing ponds. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8) The area is zoned Railway and its current use is industrial associated with railway purposes. (9) Lease commenced 10 May 1990 for a term of 21 years for the purpose of Motor Cycle Track. (10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(5) Approximately 400 metres from tailing ponds. (6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8) The area is zoned Railway and its current use is industrial associated with railway purposes. (9) Lease commenced 10 May 1990 for a term of 21 years for the purpose of Motor Cycle Track. (10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(6) Not applicable. (7) No. (8) The area is zoned Railway and its current use is industrial associated with railway purposes. (9) Lease commenced 10 May 1990 for a term of 21 years for the purpose of Motor Cycle Track. (10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(7) No. (8) The area is zoned Railway and its current use is industrial associated with railway purposes. (9) Lease commenced 10 May 1990 for a term of 21 years for the purpose of Motor Cycle Track. (10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(8) The area is zoned Railway and its current use is industrial associated with railway purposes. (9) Lease commenced 10 May 1990 for a term of 21 years for the purpose of Motor Cycle Track. (10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(9) Lease commenced 10 May 1990 for a term of 21 years for the purpose of Motor Cycle Track. (10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(10) Not applicable. (11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(11) Yes. See tabled paper. (12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(12) Not applicable. (13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(13) Approximately 24. (14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(14) Not applicable. (15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(15) 1,000 metres and approximately 20 houses – April 2000 aerial photography. (16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(16) Not applicable (see 15). (17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(17) No. (18) See answer 1.
(18) See answer 1.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.