A WA parliamentary question on notice regarding rail access, downstream processing projects, environmental assessments, and government support as of March 31, 2006. The response indicates no changes to rail access, no project approvals, one project under environmental assessment, and no direct financial support for individual projects.

AnsweredQoN 940Legislative Assembly
Asked
2 May 2006
Portfolio
Resources and Assisting the Minister for State Development

QuestionView source ↗

I refer the Minister to Question on Notice No. 740 of 2006 and ask that the Minister provide answers to the following questions in the same format -
(1) Were there any changes to rail access arrangements during the three months ending 31 March 2006?
(2) How many downstream processing projects were approved for final construction and start-up during the three months ending 31 March 2006?
(3) How many proposals for downstream processing projects were waiting to be assessed or were in the process of being assessed by the Environmental Protection Authority after being referred to this Authority, as at 31 March 2006?
(4) What was the average waiting time for the assessment of downstream processing projects referred to the Environmental Protection Authority, as at 31 March 2006?
(5) How many proposed downstream processing projects were seeking financial or infrastructure support or assistance from the State Government as at 31 March 2006?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
30 May 2006
Responded by
Minister for Resources and Assisting the Minister for State Development
Response time
28 days
(1) There have been no changes to rail access arrangements during the three months ending 31 March 2006. (2) No downstream processing projects were approved for final construction and start-up during the three months ending 31 March 2006. (3) There was one downstream processing project in the environmental assessment process as at 31 March 2006. (4) The project proponent was at the stage of the proponent preparing its Environmental Review document for submission to the Environmental Authority for assessment. (5) At any given time, there are discussions being conducted on the general facilitation of downstream investments. The State does not, however, give financial support to individual downstream processing projects. The State prefers to provide common user infrastructure facilities, when this is justified by a business case.
(2) No downstream processing projects were approved for final construction and start-up during the three months ending 31 March 2006. (3) There was one downstream processing project in the environmental assessment process as at 31 March 2006. (4) The project proponent was at the stage of the proponent preparing its Environmental Review document for submission to the Environmental Authority for assessment. (5) At any given time, there are discussions being conducted on the general facilitation of downstream investments. The State does not, however, give financial support to individual downstream processing projects. The State prefers to provide common user infrastructure facilities, when this is justified by a business case.
(3) There was one downstream processing project in the environmental assessment process as at 31 March 2006. (4) The project proponent was at the stage of the proponent preparing its Environmental Review document for submission to the Environmental Authority for assessment. (5) At any given time, there are discussions being conducted on the general facilitation of downstream investments. The State does not, however, give financial support to individual downstream processing projects. The State prefers to provide common user infrastructure facilities, when this is justified by a business case.
(4) The project proponent was at the stage of the proponent preparing its Environmental Review document for submission to the Environmental Authority for assessment. (5) At any given time, there are discussions being conducted on the general facilitation of downstream investments. The State does not, however, give financial support to individual downstream processing projects. The State prefers to provide common user infrastructure facilities, when this is justified by a business case.
(5) At any given time, there are discussions being conducted on the general facilitation of downstream investments. The State does not, however, give financial support to individual downstream processing projects. The State prefers to provide common user infrastructure facilities, when this is justified by a business case.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more