Home›Questions on Notice›QoN 1153

❓ Question on Notice regarding expenditure on the proposed Thornlie-Mandurah rail line extension since 2011. The response provides some figures but lacks detail on internal costs and refers to a tabled paper for consultancy information.

AnsweredQoN 1153Legislative Council

Asked

6 May 2014

Member

Hon Ken Travers

Portfolio

Transport

QuestionView source ↗

(1) Since 1 July 2011, how much has been spent on any work related to the future extension of the Thornlie rail line to the Mandurah rail line? (2) What was the total cost of all internal work undertaken on this project? (3) Have any consultants been employed to assist in any work on this project? (4) If yes to (3): (a) what was the name of the consultant(s); (b) what work did they undertake; and (c) what was the cost of each consultancy? (5) Have any other contracts related to this project been let? (6) If yes to (5): (a) who was the contract with; (b) what was the contract for; and (c) what was the cost of each contract? (7) Have any concept designs, animations or artists impressions been prepared for this project? (8) If yes to (7): (a) what were they; (b) who produced them; and (c) what was the cost? (9) What is the total amount spent on this project since 1 July 2011?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered

24 June 2014

Responded by

Parliamentary Secretary representing the Minister for Transport

Response time

49 days

(1) $2 145 672.19 Inc. GST as of 14 May 2014.
(2) It is not possible to quantify these costs as they are part of a broader operating budget.
(3)Yes.
(4)(a)-(c) Refer to the table [see tabled paper no. ].
(5) No.
(6)(a)-(c) Not applicable
(7) Yes. These are included in Part 4.
(8)(a)-(c) See part 4
(9) $2 145 672.19 including GST as of 14 May 2014.

View on Parliament of WA