❓ A parliamentary question seeks information on public sector agency relocations and associated refurbishment costs since September 2008. The answer provides limited details, referencing a tabled paper and specific refurbishment expenses.
AnsweredQoN 2967Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(1) Which public sector agencies or sections of any agency have vacated rented or Government-owned buildings since 23 September 2008?
(2) What was the street address of the agency or agency section?
(3) On what date did the agency or section of the agency vacate the building?
(4) Where did the agency or section of agency relocate to?
(5) For any agency or section of an agency that vacated premises since 23 September 2008, was any money expended on refurbishments or upgrades in the period between 23 September 2008 and the date on which the agency or agency section vacated the premises; and
(a) if yes, how much was spent on these refurbishments or upgrades?
(2) What was the street address of the agency or agency section?
(3) On what date did the agency or section of the agency vacate the building?
(4) Where did the agency or section of agency relocate to?
(5) For any agency or section of an agency that vacated premises since 23 September 2008, was any money expended on refurbishments or upgrades in the period between 23 September 2008 and the date on which the agency or agency section vacated the premises; and
(a) if yes, how much was spent on these refurbishments or upgrades?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
7 September 2010
Response time
111 days
The following answer covers leased space in privately owned buildings for which leases were established and managed by the Building Management and Works (BMW) business of the Department of Treasury and Finance for General Government Sector agencies or by the Department of the Premier and Cabinet, and multi-tenanted Government-owned office buildings managed by BMW.
(1-4) [See Tabled Paper Number].
(5) Yes.
(a)(i) The premises at 169 Scarborough Beach Road was refurbished at a cost of $14,453; and
(ii) The premises at Shop 43 Kwinana Hub Shopping Centre was re-carpeted at a cost of $2,700.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
(1-4) [See Tabled Paper Number].
(5) Yes.
(a)(i) The premises at 169 Scarborough Beach Road was refurbished at a cost of $14,453; and
(ii) The premises at Shop 43 Kwinana Hub Shopping Centre was re-carpeted at a cost of $2,700.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.