❓ A WA parliamentary question seeks details on the Water Corporation's infill sewerage program expenditure and net debt, comparing past spending with pre-election plans and current estimates. The response provides specific figures for each requested year.
AnsweredQoN 755Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
(1) How much did the Water Corporation spend on the infill sewerage program for each of the four years 1997-98 to 2000-01? (2) What was the planned expenditure pre-election for the infill sewerage program for each of the four years from 2001-02 to 2004-05? (3) What are the current estimates of expenditure for the infill sewerage program for each of the four years from 2001-02 to 2004-05? (4) What is the Water Corporation’s current estimate of its net debt position for each of the four years from 2001-02 to 2004-05? Hon N.D. GRIFFITHS
AnswerView source ↗
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98, $80.1 million; 1998-99, $96.3 million; 1999-2000, $87.2 million; 2000-01, $86.9 million. All figures are in actual dollars. (2) 2001-02, $91.6 million; 2002-03, $89.9 million; 2003-04, $85 million; 2004-05, $55.5 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (3) 2001-02, $50.8 million; 2002-03, $31.5 million; 2003-04, $34.3 million; 2004-05, $38 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (4) 2001-02, $1 035 million; 2002-03, $1 090 million; 2003-04, $1 151 million; 2004-05, $1 121 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
(2) What was the planned expenditure pre-election for the infill sewerage program for each of the four years from 2001-02 to 2004-05? (3) What are the current estimates of expenditure for the infill sewerage program for each of the four years from 2001-02 to 2004-05? (4) What is the Water Corporation’s current estimate of its net debt position for each of the four years from 2001-02 to 2004-05? Hon N.D. GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98, $80.1 million; 1998-99, $96.3 million; 1999-2000, $87.2 million; 2000-01, $86.9 million. All figures are in actual dollars. (2) 2001-02, $91.6 million; 2002-03, $89.9 million; 2003-04, $85 million; 2004-05, $55.5 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (3) 2001-02, $50.8 million; 2002-03, $31.5 million; 2003-04, $34.3 million; 2004-05, $38 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (4) 2001-02, $1 035 million; 2002-03, $1 090 million; 2003-04, $1 151 million; 2004-05, $1 121 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
(3) What are the current estimates of expenditure for the infill sewerage program for each of the four years from 2001-02 to 2004-05? (4) What is the Water Corporation’s current estimate of its net debt position for each of the four years from 2001-02 to 2004-05? Hon N.D. GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98, $80.1 million; 1998-99, $96.3 million; 1999-2000, $87.2 million; 2000-01, $86.9 million. All figures are in actual dollars. (2) 2001-02, $91.6 million; 2002-03, $89.9 million; 2003-04, $85 million; 2004-05, $55.5 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (3) 2001-02, $50.8 million; 2002-03, $31.5 million; 2003-04, $34.3 million; 2004-05, $38 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (4) 2001-02, $1 035 million; 2002-03, $1 090 million; 2003-04, $1 151 million; 2004-05, $1 121 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
(4) What is the Water Corporation’s current estimate of its net debt position for each of the four years from 2001-02 to 2004-05? Hon N.D. GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98, $80.1 million; 1998-99, $96.3 million; 1999-2000, $87.2 million; 2000-01, $86.9 million. All figures are in actual dollars. (2) 2001-02, $91.6 million; 2002-03, $89.9 million; 2003-04, $85 million; 2004-05, $55.5 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (3) 2001-02, $50.8 million; 2002-03, $31.5 million; 2003-04, $34.3 million; 2004-05, $38 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (4) 2001-02, $1 035 million; 2002-03, $1 090 million; 2003-04, $1 151 million; 2004-05, $1 121 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
Hon N.D. GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98, $80.1 million; 1998-99, $96.3 million; 1999-2000, $87.2 million; 2000-01, $86.9 million. All figures are in actual dollars. (2) 2001-02, $91.6 million; 2002-03, $89.9 million; 2003-04, $85 million; 2004-05, $55.5 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (3) 2001-02, $50.8 million; 2002-03, $31.5 million; 2003-04, $34.3 million; 2004-05, $38 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (4) 2001-02, $1 035 million; 2002-03, $1 090 million; 2003-04, $1 151 million; 2004-05, $1 121 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98, $80.1 million; 1998-99, $96.3 million; 1999-2000, $87.2 million; 2000-01, $86.9 million. All figures are in actual dollars. (2) 2001-02, $91.6 million; 2002-03, $89.9 million; 2003-04, $85 million; 2004-05, $55.5 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (3) 2001-02, $50.8 million; 2002-03, $31.5 million; 2003-04, $34.3 million; 2004-05, $38 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (4) 2001-02, $1 035 million; 2002-03, $1 090 million; 2003-04, $1 151 million; 2004-05, $1 121 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
(1) 1997-98, $80.1 million; 1998-99, $96.3 million; 1999-2000, $87.2 million; 2000-01, $86.9 million. All figures are in actual dollars. (2) 2001-02, $91.6 million; 2002-03, $89.9 million; 2003-04, $85 million; 2004-05, $55.5 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (3) 2001-02, $50.8 million; 2002-03, $31.5 million; 2003-04, $34.3 million; 2004-05, $38 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (4) 2001-02, $1 035 million; 2002-03, $1 090 million; 2003-04, $1 151 million; 2004-05, $1 121 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
(2) 2001-02, $91.6 million; 2002-03, $89.9 million; 2003-04, $85 million; 2004-05, $55.5 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (3) 2001-02, $50.8 million; 2002-03, $31.5 million; 2003-04, $34.3 million; 2004-05, $38 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (4) 2001-02, $1 035 million; 2002-03, $1 090 million; 2003-04, $1 151 million; 2004-05, $1 121 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
(3) 2001-02, $50.8 million; 2002-03, $31.5 million; 2003-04, $34.3 million; 2004-05, $38 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (4) 2001-02, $1 035 million; 2002-03, $1 090 million; 2003-04, $1 151 million; 2004-05, $1 121 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
(4) 2001-02, $1 035 million; 2002-03, $1 090 million; 2003-04, $1 151 million; 2004-05, $1 121 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
(2) What was the planned expenditure pre-election for the infill sewerage program for each of the four years from 2001-02 to 2004-05? (3) What are the current estimates of expenditure for the infill sewerage program for each of the four years from 2001-02 to 2004-05? (4) What is the Water Corporation’s current estimate of its net debt position for each of the four years from 2001-02 to 2004-05? Hon N.D. GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98, $80.1 million; 1998-99, $96.3 million; 1999-2000, $87.2 million; 2000-01, $86.9 million. All figures are in actual dollars. (2) 2001-02, $91.6 million; 2002-03, $89.9 million; 2003-04, $85 million; 2004-05, $55.5 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (3) 2001-02, $50.8 million; 2002-03, $31.5 million; 2003-04, $34.3 million; 2004-05, $38 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (4) 2001-02, $1 035 million; 2002-03, $1 090 million; 2003-04, $1 151 million; 2004-05, $1 121 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
(3) What are the current estimates of expenditure for the infill sewerage program for each of the four years from 2001-02 to 2004-05? (4) What is the Water Corporation’s current estimate of its net debt position for each of the four years from 2001-02 to 2004-05? Hon N.D. GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98, $80.1 million; 1998-99, $96.3 million; 1999-2000, $87.2 million; 2000-01, $86.9 million. All figures are in actual dollars. (2) 2001-02, $91.6 million; 2002-03, $89.9 million; 2003-04, $85 million; 2004-05, $55.5 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (3) 2001-02, $50.8 million; 2002-03, $31.5 million; 2003-04, $34.3 million; 2004-05, $38 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (4) 2001-02, $1 035 million; 2002-03, $1 090 million; 2003-04, $1 151 million; 2004-05, $1 121 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
(4) What is the Water Corporation’s current estimate of its net debt position for each of the four years from 2001-02 to 2004-05? Hon N.D. GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98, $80.1 million; 1998-99, $96.3 million; 1999-2000, $87.2 million; 2000-01, $86.9 million. All figures are in actual dollars. (2) 2001-02, $91.6 million; 2002-03, $89.9 million; 2003-04, $85 million; 2004-05, $55.5 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (3) 2001-02, $50.8 million; 2002-03, $31.5 million; 2003-04, $34.3 million; 2004-05, $38 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (4) 2001-02, $1 035 million; 2002-03, $1 090 million; 2003-04, $1 151 million; 2004-05, $1 121 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
Hon N.D. GRIFFITHS replied: I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98, $80.1 million; 1998-99, $96.3 million; 1999-2000, $87.2 million; 2000-01, $86.9 million. All figures are in actual dollars. (2) 2001-02, $91.6 million; 2002-03, $89.9 million; 2003-04, $85 million; 2004-05, $55.5 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (3) 2001-02, $50.8 million; 2002-03, $31.5 million; 2003-04, $34.3 million; 2004-05, $38 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (4) 2001-02, $1 035 million; 2002-03, $1 090 million; 2003-04, $1 151 million; 2004-05, $1 121 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
I thank the member for some notice of this question. (1) 1997-98, $80.1 million; 1998-99, $96.3 million; 1999-2000, $87.2 million; 2000-01, $86.9 million. All figures are in actual dollars. (2) 2001-02, $91.6 million; 2002-03, $89.9 million; 2003-04, $85 million; 2004-05, $55.5 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (3) 2001-02, $50.8 million; 2002-03, $31.5 million; 2003-04, $34.3 million; 2004-05, $38 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (4) 2001-02, $1 035 million; 2002-03, $1 090 million; 2003-04, $1 151 million; 2004-05, $1 121 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
(1) 1997-98, $80.1 million; 1998-99, $96.3 million; 1999-2000, $87.2 million; 2000-01, $86.9 million. All figures are in actual dollars. (2) 2001-02, $91.6 million; 2002-03, $89.9 million; 2003-04, $85 million; 2004-05, $55.5 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (3) 2001-02, $50.8 million; 2002-03, $31.5 million; 2003-04, $34.3 million; 2004-05, $38 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (4) 2001-02, $1 035 million; 2002-03, $1 090 million; 2003-04, $1 151 million; 2004-05, $1 121 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
(2) 2001-02, $91.6 million; 2002-03, $89.9 million; 2003-04, $85 million; 2004-05, $55.5 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (3) 2001-02, $50.8 million; 2002-03, $31.5 million; 2003-04, $34.3 million; 2004-05, $38 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (4) 2001-02, $1 035 million; 2002-03, $1 090 million; 2003-04, $1 151 million; 2004-05, $1 121 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
(3) 2001-02, $50.8 million; 2002-03, $31.5 million; 2003-04, $34.3 million; 2004-05, $38 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. (4) 2001-02, $1 035 million; 2002-03, $1 090 million; 2003-04, $1 151 million; 2004-05, $1 121 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
(4) 2001-02, $1 035 million; 2002-03, $1 090 million; 2003-04, $1 151 million; 2004-05, $1 121 million. All figures in December 2001 dollars. The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
The Leader of the Opposition was about to ask me a question. I now have a true copy of the answer.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.