❓ A Western Australian parliamentary Question on Notice requests information on lost or stolen mobile phones within the Minister for Local Government and Regional Development's portfolio for the 2004-2006 financial years. The response details the number of phones lost/stolen, replacement costs, police reports, and outcomes for the Department of Local Government and Regional Development.
AnsweredQoN 3884Legislative Council
QuestionView source ↗
For each Department and Agency under the Minister’s control, including the Minister’s office -
(1) How many mobile phones were reported lost or stolen in the financial years -
(a) 2004-2005; and
(b) 2005-2006?
(2) What was the cost of replacing the lost or stolen mobile phones in each of these financial years?
(3) Was the loss or theft of any of these mobile phones reported to the police?
(4) If so, when were they reported?
(5) Of those reported, what has been the outcome?
(6) If any were not reported, why not?
(1) How many mobile phones were reported lost or stolen in the financial years -
(a) 2004-2005; and
(b) 2005-2006?
(2) What was the cost of replacing the lost or stolen mobile phones in each of these financial years?
(3) Was the loss or theft of any of these mobile phones reported to the police?
(4) If so, when were they reported?
(5) Of those reported, what has been the outcome?
(6) If any were not reported, why not?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
17 October 2006
Responded by
Minister for Local Government and Regional Development
Response time
56 days
(b) 2005-2006?
(1) (a) - (b) Nil (2) - (6) Not Applicable For The Department of Local Government and Regional Development (1)(a) One (b) One (2) $232.00 in 2004-2005 $179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(2) - (6) Not Applicable For The Department of Local Government and Regional Development (1)(a) One (b) One (2) $232.00 in 2004-2005 $179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
For The Department of Local Government and Regional Development (1)(a) One (b) One (2) $232.00 in 2004-2005 $179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
For The Department of Local Government and Regional Development (1)(a) One (b) One (2) $232.00 in 2004-2005 $179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
For The Department of Local Government and Regional Development (1)(a) One (b) One (2) $232.00 in 2004-2005 $179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(1)(a) One (b) One (2) $232.00 in 2004-2005 $179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(b) One (2) $232.00 in 2004-2005 $179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(2) $232.00 in 2004-2005 $179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(2) $232.00 in 2004-2005 $179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
$179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(1) (a) - (b) Nil (2) - (6) Not Applicable For The Department of Local Government and Regional Development (1)(a) One (b) One (2) $232.00 in 2004-2005 $179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(2) - (6) Not Applicable For The Department of Local Government and Regional Development (1)(a) One (b) One (2) $232.00 in 2004-2005 $179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
For The Department of Local Government and Regional Development (1)(a) One (b) One (2) $232.00 in 2004-2005 $179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
For The Department of Local Government and Regional Development (1)(a) One (b) One (2) $232.00 in 2004-2005 $179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
For The Department of Local Government and Regional Development (1)(a) One (b) One (2) $232.00 in 2004-2005 $179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(1)(a) One (b) One (2) $232.00 in 2004-2005 $179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(b) One (2) $232.00 in 2004-2005 $179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(2) $232.00 in 2004-2005 $179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(2) $232.00 in 2004-2005 $179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
$179.00 in 2005-2006 (3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(3) The mobile phone stolen in 2005-2006 was reported to police (4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(4) It was reported the same day as the theft occurred. (5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(5) The mobile phone has not been recovered. The service was cancelled as soon as the theft was discovered. (6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
(6) The Department of Local Government and Regional Development was unable to determine whether the mobile phone missing in 2004-2005 was stolen or lost. The SIM card was cancelled immediately the absence was discovered.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.