A parliamentary question accuses the Minister of Police and Emergency Services of dishonesty regarding the release of a repeat offender. The Deputy Speaker repeatedly upholds a point of order against the question due to its accusatory nature.

AnsweredQoN 582Legislative Assembly
Asked
11 October 2005
Portfolio
Police and Emergency Services

QuestionView source ↗

I have a supplementary question. Why does the minister not have the honesty to tell the people of Western Australia that this serious - Point of Order Mr J.C. KOBELKE : I have a point of order. Mr R.F. Johnson : What are you trying to hide? Mr J.C. KOBELKE : The question clearly had an inference - Several members interjected. The DEPUTY SPEAKER : Order! I have given other members some latitude in getting to the point when quoting a standing order. If members give the minister a chance we might be able to hear his point of order. Mr J.C. KOBELKE : The question clearly contained an inference as to the honesty of the minister. A question is not in order if it impugns the integrity of another member. The DEPUTY SPEAKER : I will uphold that point of order and ask the member for Hillarys to rephrase his question without any impugnation of the minister. Questions without Notice Resumed Mr R.F. JOHNSON : Why does the minister not tell the truth when telling the people of Western Australia that this serious repeat offender was released onto the streets of Perth as a result of police intervention, instead of trying to cover it up? Mrs M.H. ROBERTS

AnswerView source ↗

The answer is: because all the information that I have received from the Commissioner of Police is contrary to that statement.
Mr R.F. Johnson : What are you trying to hide? Mr J.C. KOBELKE : The question clearly had an inference - Several members interjected. The DEPUTY SPEAKER : Order! I have given other members some latitude in getting to the point when quoting a standing order. If members give the minister a chance we might be able to hear his point of order. Mr J.C. KOBELKE : The question clearly contained an inference as to the honesty of the minister. A question is not in order if it impugns the integrity of another member. The DEPUTY SPEAKER : I will uphold that point of order and ask the member for Hillarys to rephrase his question without any impugnation of the minister. Questions without Notice Resumed Mr R.F. JOHNSON : Why does the minister not tell the truth when telling the people of Western Australia that this serious repeat offender was released onto the streets of Perth as a result of police intervention, instead of trying to cover it up? Mrs M.H. ROBERTS replied: The answer is: because all the information that I have received from the Commissioner of Police is contrary to that statement.
Mr J.C. KOBELKE : The question clearly had an inference - Several members interjected. The DEPUTY SPEAKER : Order! I have given other members some latitude in getting to the point when quoting a standing order. If members give the minister a chance we might be able to hear his point of order. Mr J.C. KOBELKE : The question clearly contained an inference as to the honesty of the minister. A question is not in order if it impugns the integrity of another member. The DEPUTY SPEAKER : I will uphold that point of order and ask the member for Hillarys to rephrase his question without any impugnation of the minister. Questions without Notice Resumed Mr R.F. JOHNSON : Why does the minister not tell the truth when telling the people of Western Australia that this serious repeat offender was released onto the streets of Perth as a result of police intervention, instead of trying to cover it up? Mrs M.H. ROBERTS replied: The answer is: because all the information that I have received from the Commissioner of Police is contrary to that statement.
Several members interjected. The DEPUTY SPEAKER : Order! I have given other members some latitude in getting to the point when quoting a standing order. If members give the minister a chance we might be able to hear his point of order. Mr J.C. KOBELKE : The question clearly contained an inference as to the honesty of the minister. A question is not in order if it impugns the integrity of another member. The DEPUTY SPEAKER : I will uphold that point of order and ask the member for Hillarys to rephrase his question without any impugnation of the minister. Questions without Notice Resumed Mr R.F. JOHNSON : Why does the minister not tell the truth when telling the people of Western Australia that this serious repeat offender was released onto the streets of Perth as a result of police intervention, instead of trying to cover it up? Mrs M.H. ROBERTS replied: The answer is: because all the information that I have received from the Commissioner of Police is contrary to that statement.
The DEPUTY SPEAKER : Order! I have given other members some latitude in getting to the point when quoting a standing order. If members give the minister a chance we might be able to hear his point of order. Mr J.C. KOBELKE : The question clearly contained an inference as to the honesty of the minister. A question is not in order if it impugns the integrity of another member. The DEPUTY SPEAKER : I will uphold that point of order and ask the member for Hillarys to rephrase his question without any impugnation of the minister. Questions without Notice Resumed Mr R.F. JOHNSON : Why does the minister not tell the truth when telling the people of Western Australia that this serious repeat offender was released onto the streets of Perth as a result of police intervention, instead of trying to cover it up? Mrs M.H. ROBERTS replied: The answer is: because all the information that I have received from the Commissioner of Police is contrary to that statement.
Mr J.C. KOBELKE : The question clearly contained an inference as to the honesty of the minister. A question is not in order if it impugns the integrity of another member. The DEPUTY SPEAKER : I will uphold that point of order and ask the member for Hillarys to rephrase his question without any impugnation of the minister. Questions without Notice Resumed Mr R.F. JOHNSON : Why does the minister not tell the truth when telling the people of Western Australia that this serious repeat offender was released onto the streets of Perth as a result of police intervention, instead of trying to cover it up? Mrs M.H. ROBERTS replied: The answer is: because all the information that I have received from the Commissioner of Police is contrary to that statement.
The DEPUTY SPEAKER : I will uphold that point of order and ask the member for Hillarys to rephrase his question without any impugnation of the minister. Questions without Notice Resumed Mr R.F. JOHNSON : Why does the minister not tell the truth when telling the people of Western Australia that this serious repeat offender was released onto the streets of Perth as a result of police intervention, instead of trying to cover it up? Mrs M.H. ROBERTS replied: The answer is: because all the information that I have received from the Commissioner of Police is contrary to that statement.
Mrs M.H. ROBERTS replied: The answer is: because all the information that I have received from the Commissioner of Police is contrary to that statement.
The answer is: because all the information that I have received from the Commissioner of Police is contrary to that statement.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more