❓ Ms MacTiernan questions the Police Minister regarding the 1998 audit of immobilisers installed under a government subsidy scheme, revealing a 30% failure rate and seeking details on recalls, repairs, installer accountability, and further audits. The Minister's initial response refers to another question.
AnsweredQoN 265Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to the audit of immobilisers, which had been installed under the Government subsidy scheme, carried out for the WA Police Service in 1998 which found that 30% of immobilisers inspected needed to be recalled and repaired, and I ask - (a) how many installers were asked to recall and repair immobilisers as a result of the findings of this audit; (b) how many immobilisers were repaired; (c) how many installers were removed from the Immobiliser Subsidy Scheme; (d) was a further audit of those installers which were found to have failed an installation to determine the extent of sub-standard work carried out; and (e) if not, why not? Answered on 5 September 2000 The Minister
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
5 September 2000
Response time
27 days
Please refer to Question 78.
(b) how many immobilisers were repaired; (c) how many installers were removed from the Immobiliser Subsidy Scheme; (d) was a further audit of those installers which were found to have failed an installation to determine the extent of sub-standard work carried out; and (e) if not, why not?
(c) how many installers were removed from the Immobiliser Subsidy Scheme; (d) was a further audit of those installers which were found to have failed an installation to determine the extent of sub-standard work carried out; and (e) if not, why not?
(d) was a further audit of those installers which were found to have failed an installation to determine the extent of sub-standard work carried out; and (e) if not, why not?
(e) if not, why not?
(b) how many immobilisers were repaired; (c) how many installers were removed from the Immobiliser Subsidy Scheme; (d) was a further audit of those installers which were found to have failed an installation to determine the extent of sub-standard work carried out; and (e) if not, why not?
(c) how many installers were removed from the Immobiliser Subsidy Scheme; (d) was a further audit of those installers which were found to have failed an installation to determine the extent of sub-standard work carried out; and (e) if not, why not?
(d) was a further audit of those installers which were found to have failed an installation to determine the extent of sub-standard work carried out; and (e) if not, why not?
(e) if not, why not?
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.