❓ Question on Notice regarding the future of the Safer WA program, specifically concerning proposed structural changes, community input, and bureaucratic control. The Minister's response indicates support for the program's continuation and a desire to enhance community involvement.
AnsweredQoN 710Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(b) if so, does the Minister support this direction; (c) if so, on what grounds; (d) if not, what action does the Minister propose to ensure the continued operation of the Safer WA program; (e) does the Minister agree that the Safer WA name is recognised within the community; (f) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively limits community input to the bottom; (g) if so, does the Minister agree with such limited community input; (h) if so, why; (i) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to ensure that the opportunity for real community consultation is retained; (j) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively places control in the hands of the bureaucracy; (k) if so, does the Minister support this proposition; (l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(c) if so, on what grounds; (d) if not, what action does the Minister propose to ensure the continued operation of the Safer WA program; (e) does the Minister agree that the Safer WA name is recognised within the community; (f) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively limits community input to the bottom; (g) if so, does the Minister agree with such limited community input; (h) if so, why; (i) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to ensure that the opportunity for real community consultation is retained; (j) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively places control in the hands of the bureaucracy; (k) if so, does the Minister support this proposition; (l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(d) if not, what action does the Minister propose to ensure the continued operation of the Safer WA program; (e) does the Minister agree that the Safer WA name is recognised within the community; (f) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively limits community input to the bottom; (g) if so, does the Minister agree with such limited community input; (h) if so, why; (i) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to ensure that the opportunity for real community consultation is retained; (j) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively places control in the hands of the bureaucracy; (k) if so, does the Minister support this proposition; (l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(e) does the Minister agree that the Safer WA name is recognised within the community; (f) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively limits community input to the bottom; (g) if so, does the Minister agree with such limited community input; (h) if so, why; (i) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to ensure that the opportunity for real community consultation is retained; (j) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively places control in the hands of the bureaucracy; (k) if so, does the Minister support this proposition; (l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(f) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively limits community input to the bottom; (g) if so, does the Minister agree with such limited community input; (h) if so, why; (i) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to ensure that the opportunity for real community consultation is retained; (j) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively places control in the hands of the bureaucracy; (k) if so, does the Minister support this proposition; (l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(g) if so, does the Minister agree with such limited community input; (h) if so, why; (i) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to ensure that the opportunity for real community consultation is retained; (j) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively places control in the hands of the bureaucracy; (k) if so, does the Minister support this proposition; (l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(h) if so, why; (i) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to ensure that the opportunity for real community consultation is retained; (j) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively places control in the hands of the bureaucracy; (k) if so, does the Minister support this proposition; (l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(i) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to ensure that the opportunity for real community consultation is retained; (j) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively places control in the hands of the bureaucracy; (k) if so, does the Minister support this proposition; (l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(j) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively places control in the hands of the bureaucracy; (k) if so, does the Minister support this proposition; (l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(k) if so, does the Minister support this proposition; (l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(e) No, the feedback during the extensive consultations indicated that the name SAFER W.A. had poor and ambiguous recognition in the wider community. (f) - (j) No, the proposed structure seeks to take a whole of Government approach and to enhance 'grassroots' community involvement at the local level and make it more meaningful. In fact it seeks to ensure that there is community involvement at all levels. (k) Best practice models for crime prevention, which are recognised nationally and internationally, adopt whole of Government and whole of community approaches. (l) See (k). (m) See (k). (n) When the consultative process has been finalised.
(f) - (j) No, the proposed structure seeks to take a whole of Government approach and to enhance 'grassroots' community involvement at the local level and make it more meaningful. In fact it seeks to ensure that there is community involvement at all levels. (k) Best practice models for crime prevention, which are recognised nationally and internationally, adopt whole of Government and whole of community approaches. (l) See (k). (m) See (k). (n) When the consultative process has been finalised.
(k) Best practice models for crime prevention, which are recognised nationally and internationally, adopt whole of Government and whole of community approaches. (l) See (k). (m) See (k). (n) When the consultative process has been finalised.
(l) See (k). (m) See (k). (n) When the consultative process has been finalised.
(m) See (k). (n) When the consultative process has been finalised.
(n) When the consultative process has been finalised.
(c) if so, on what grounds; (d) if not, what action does the Minister propose to ensure the continued operation of the Safer WA program; (e) does the Minister agree that the Safer WA name is recognised within the community; (f) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively limits community input to the bottom; (g) if so, does the Minister agree with such limited community input; (h) if so, why; (i) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to ensure that the opportunity for real community consultation is retained; (j) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively places control in the hands of the bureaucracy; (k) if so, does the Minister support this proposition; (l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(d) if not, what action does the Minister propose to ensure the continued operation of the Safer WA program; (e) does the Minister agree that the Safer WA name is recognised within the community; (f) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively limits community input to the bottom; (g) if so, does the Minister agree with such limited community input; (h) if so, why; (i) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to ensure that the opportunity for real community consultation is retained; (j) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively places control in the hands of the bureaucracy; (k) if so, does the Minister support this proposition; (l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(e) does the Minister agree that the Safer WA name is recognised within the community; (f) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively limits community input to the bottom; (g) if so, does the Minister agree with such limited community input; (h) if so, why; (i) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to ensure that the opportunity for real community consultation is retained; (j) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively places control in the hands of the bureaucracy; (k) if so, does the Minister support this proposition; (l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(f) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively limits community input to the bottom; (g) if so, does the Minister agree with such limited community input; (h) if so, why; (i) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to ensure that the opportunity for real community consultation is retained; (j) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively places control in the hands of the bureaucracy; (k) if so, does the Minister support this proposition; (l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(g) if so, does the Minister agree with such limited community input; (h) if so, why; (i) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to ensure that the opportunity for real community consultation is retained; (j) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively places control in the hands of the bureaucracy; (k) if so, does the Minister support this proposition; (l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(h) if so, why; (i) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to ensure that the opportunity for real community consultation is retained; (j) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively places control in the hands of the bureaucracy; (k) if so, does the Minister support this proposition; (l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(i) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to ensure that the opportunity for real community consultation is retained; (j) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively places control in the hands of the bureaucracy; (k) if so, does the Minister support this proposition; (l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(j) does the Minister agree that the proposed new structure effectively places control in the hands of the bureaucracy; (k) if so, does the Minister support this proposition; (l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(k) if so, does the Minister support this proposition; (l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(l) if so, why; (m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(m) if not, what steps does the Minister propose to broaden the operation of the proposed new structure; and (n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(n) when will the Minister detail the Government’s response to the proposal?
(e) No, the feedback during the extensive consultations indicated that the name SAFER W.A. had poor and ambiguous recognition in the wider community. (f) - (j) No, the proposed structure seeks to take a whole of Government approach and to enhance 'grassroots' community involvement at the local level and make it more meaningful. In fact it seeks to ensure that there is community involvement at all levels. (k) Best practice models for crime prevention, which are recognised nationally and internationally, adopt whole of Government and whole of community approaches. (l) See (k). (m) See (k). (n) When the consultative process has been finalised.
(f) - (j) No, the proposed structure seeks to take a whole of Government approach and to enhance 'grassroots' community involvement at the local level and make it more meaningful. In fact it seeks to ensure that there is community involvement at all levels. (k) Best practice models for crime prevention, which are recognised nationally and internationally, adopt whole of Government and whole of community approaches. (l) See (k). (m) See (k). (n) When the consultative process has been finalised.
(k) Best practice models for crime prevention, which are recognised nationally and internationally, adopt whole of Government and whole of community approaches. (l) See (k). (m) See (k). (n) When the consultative process has been finalised.
(l) See (k). (m) See (k). (n) When the consultative process has been finalised.
(m) See (k). (n) When the consultative process has been finalised.
(n) When the consultative process has been finalised.
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
3 June 2003
Responded by
Minister for Premier
Response time
98 days
(a) - (d) No, the report's recommendations seek to build on the strengths of SAFER W.A., address limitations identified during the extensive consultations by SAFER W.A. members and implement the Government's policies to enhance the State's efforts to prevent and reduce crime.
(e) No, the feedback during the extensive consultations indicated that the name SAFER W.A. had poor and ambiguous recognition in the wider community.
(f) - (j) No, the proposed structure seeks to take a whole of Government approach and to enhance 'grassroots' community involvement at the local level and make it more meaningful. In fact it seeks to ensure that there is community involvement at all levels.
(k) Best practice models for crime prevention, which are recognised nationally and internationally, adopt whole of Government and whole of community approaches.
(l) See (k).
(m) See (k).
(n) When the consultative process has been finalised.
(e) No, the feedback during the extensive consultations indicated that the name SAFER W.A. had poor and ambiguous recognition in the wider community.
(f) - (j) No, the proposed structure seeks to take a whole of Government approach and to enhance 'grassroots' community involvement at the local level and make it more meaningful. In fact it seeks to ensure that there is community involvement at all levels.
(k) Best practice models for crime prevention, which are recognised nationally and internationally, adopt whole of Government and whole of community approaches.
(l) See (k).
(m) See (k).
(n) When the consultative process has been finalised.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.