Hon Robin Chapple asks about the unauthorized removal of a dune system in Esperance, including who was responsible, why it wasn't referred to the EPA, and what actions are being taken to protect the remaining dunes and ensure repercussions. The Minister's response indicates an ongoing investigation.

AnsweredQoN 960Legislative Council
Asked
4 December 2013
Portfolio
Environment

QuestionView source ↗

ESPERANCE — DUNE
SYSTEM
960. Hon ROBIN CHAPPLE to the
minister representing the Minister for Environment:
I refer to question on notice 363 and question without notice
864 regarding the removal of part of a dune system in Esperance.
(1) Who
removed the dune system?
(2) Why was
the dune removal not referred to the Environmental Protection Authority?
(3) What is
the Department of Environment Regulation doing to ensure —
(a) the
protection of the remaining dune system; and
(b) repercussion
for removing the dune system?

AnswerView source ↗

I thank the
member for some notice of the question.
(1) The
responsible party is yet to be identified.
(2) The
Department of Environment Regulation is investigating the circumstances
surrounding the clearing that took place, as shown in the photograph referred
to by the honourable member for Mining and Pastoral Region.
(3) (a) The
Department of Environment Regulation will monitor the site to ensure that no
further unauthorised clearing of native vegetation occurs.
(b) See answer
to (2) above.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more