A parliamentary question probes the feasibility of Boodarie Industrial Estate for LNG processing and revisits a 1988 assessment identifying Port Hedland as a suitable LNG hub, questioning why it's no longer considered viable. The response refers to a previous answer and cites updated criteria and economic drivers.

AnsweredQoN 3633Legislative Council
Asked
15 March 2011
Portfolio
State Development

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to question without notice No. 4297, asked by the Hon. T. G. Stephens to the Minister for State Development, and the proceedings of the and Industry Conference held in Karratha in July 1988, and ask -
(1) Why is the Boodarie Industrial Estate not technically or industrially feasible for the processing of Liquefied Natural Gas?
(2) In July 1988 at the Resources and Industry Conference held in Karratha, was Port Hedland identified as a suitable location for a Liquefied Natural Gas hub?
(3) If yes to (2), why is Port Hedland now not suitable for an LNG hub?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
13 April 2011
Responded by
Leader of the House representing the Minister for State Development
Response time
29 days
Department of State Development advises:
(1) A response to this question was provided in Legislative Assembly Question on Notice 4173.
(2-3) The State Government's assessment of alternative sites outside of the Kimberley used current environmental, technical and socio-economic information relevant to the LNG sector. The criteria and economic drivers for the sector are likely to have changed significantly over the 23 years since 1988.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more