Hon Nick Goiran questions the rationale, consultation process, and resolution of concerns regarding the Criminal Investigation Amendment Regulations 2026. The answer clarifies the amendment corrected a legislative duplication and appropriate consultation was undertaken.

AnsweredQoN 1467Legislative Council
Asked
14 April 2026
Portfolio
Police

QuestionView source ↗

I refer to theCriminal Investigation Amendment Regulations 2026, and I ask:(a) what
was the catalyst for bringing about these amendments to the regulations;(b) who
was consulted prior to these amendment regulations being finalised;(c) in
reference to (b), did any person consulted raise any concerns;(d) if
yes to (c), what were these concerns;(e) in
reference to (d), have the finalised amendment regulations addressed these
concerns; and(f) if
no to (e), why not?

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
14 May 2026
Responded by
Minister for the Environment representing the Minister for Police
Response time
6 days
(a) The C riminal Investigation Amendment Regulations 2026 corrected a legislative duplication, where both the Criminal Investigation Act 2006 and the Corruption, Crime and Misconduct Act 2003 prescribed the Commissioner of the Corruption and Crime Commission as a senior officer for the purposes of section 140 of the Criminal Investigation Act 2006 .
(b-f) The Western Australia Police Force undertook the appropriate consultation necessary to amend the regulations.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more