Hon. Tom Stephens questions the government about financial returns from the soccer stadium at the Convention Centre, specifically regarding private sector contributions. The Minister responds that a direct return to Treasury is not intended, highlighting cost savings and community access provisions.

AnsweredQoN 57Legislative Council
Asked
8 August 2000
Portfolio
Tourism

QuestionView source ↗

(1) What steps does the State Government intend to take to ensure that it secures a direct return to the Treasury of the taxpayers funds that are invested in the soccer stadium at the Convention Centre? (2) Specifically, what contribution will a private sector operator of the stadium be bound to contribute back to the State to offset the expenditure of taxpayer funds for the construction of this stadium? Answered on 21 September 2000 The Minister

AnswerView source ↗

Answered
21 September 2000
Response time
44 days
(1) The Government does not intend a direct return to Treasury. I hope, however, that the Hon Member will recognize the benefit of over $20 million that is not being incurred by Government to fund the entire cost of a rectangular pitch stadium. Neither is the Government to meet the recurrent expenses of operating the stadium. (2) The Government is seeking to ensure the private sector operator of the stadium is bound to provide community access similar to the arrangements which operate under the agreement at Subiaco Oval.
(2) Specifically, what contribution will a private sector operator of the stadium be bound to contribute back to the State to offset the expenditure of taxpayer funds for the construction of this stadium? Answered on 21 September 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) The Government does not intend a direct return to Treasury. I hope, however, that the Hon Member will recognize the benefit of over $20 million that is not being incurred by Government to fund the entire cost of a rectangular pitch stadium. Neither is the Government to meet the recurrent expenses of operating the stadium. (2) The Government is seeking to ensure the private sector operator of the stadium is bound to provide community access similar to the arrangements which operate under the agreement at Subiaco Oval.
Answered on 21 September 2000 The Minister Replied: (1) The Government does not intend a direct return to Treasury. I hope, however, that the Hon Member will recognize the benefit of over $20 million that is not being incurred by Government to fund the entire cost of a rectangular pitch stadium. Neither is the Government to meet the recurrent expenses of operating the stadium. (2) The Government is seeking to ensure the private sector operator of the stadium is bound to provide community access similar to the arrangements which operate under the agreement at Subiaco Oval.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more