❓ Mr Murray inquires about funding for the Dampier-Peninsula Road and Aboriginal Access Road in the Shire of Broome. The Minister for Transport provides details of past and proposed funding, acknowledging the Shire's concerns and ongoing engagement.
AnsweredQoN 985Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
I refer to the Dampier-Peninsula Road and the Aboriginal Access Road in the Shire of Broome, and ask:
(a) what funding was budgeted in 2012–2013 for repairs and maintenance to these roads:
(i) if applicable, what specific project is this funding allocation for (e.g. shoulder maintenance, resealing, widening etc.);
(ii) if applicable, of the budgeted funds have any been acquitted; and
(iii) if no funding was budgeted, why not;
(b) is funding proposed for the Dampier Peninsula Road and the Aboriginal Access Road in the 2013–2014 Budget:
(i) if applicable, how much funding has been allocated and over what time frame;
(ii) if applicable, of this funding allocation, what specific projects will be funded; and
(iii) if no funding was proposed, why not;
(c) does the Department of Transport acknowledge that the Shire of Broome has had repairs to the Dampier-Peninsula Road and the Aboriginal Access Road listed as a priority for many years:
(i) if yes, what assessments will be undertaken by the Department of Transport to ensure these roads obtain priority funding; and
(ii) if no to (c), why not; and
(d) can you advise from 1 October 2008 until receipt of this question the number of times the Shire of Broome has contacted the Department of Transport about these roads?
(a) what funding was budgeted in 2012–2013 for repairs and maintenance to these roads:
(i) if applicable, what specific project is this funding allocation for (e.g. shoulder maintenance, resealing, widening etc.);
(ii) if applicable, of the budgeted funds have any been acquitted; and
(iii) if no funding was budgeted, why not;
(b) is funding proposed for the Dampier Peninsula Road and the Aboriginal Access Road in the 2013–2014 Budget:
(i) if applicable, how much funding has been allocated and over what time frame;
(ii) if applicable, of this funding allocation, what specific projects will be funded; and
(iii) if no funding was proposed, why not;
(c) does the Department of Transport acknowledge that the Shire of Broome has had repairs to the Dampier-Peninsula Road and the Aboriginal Access Road listed as a priority for many years:
(i) if yes, what assessments will be undertaken by the Department of Transport to ensure these roads obtain priority funding; and
(ii) if no to (c), why not; and
(d) can you advise from 1 October 2008 until receipt of this question the number of times the Shire of Broome has contacted the Department of Transport about these roads?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
11 September 2013
Responded by
Minister for Transport
Response time
36 days
(a) $1 161 127 (a)(i) Construct and seal a section of the road and reseal. (a)(ii) $1 161 127 (a)(iii) Not applicable (b) Yes (b)(i) $340 144 in 2013-14. (b)(ii) Preconstruction, reseal and improve formation. (b)(iii) Not applicable (c) Yes (c)(i) It will be considered for funding as part of the annual State budgetary process. (c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(a)(i) Construct and seal a section of the road and reseal. (a)(ii) $1 161 127 (a)(iii) Not applicable (b) Yes (b)(i) $340 144 in 2013-14. (b)(ii) Preconstruction, reseal and improve formation. (b)(iii) Not applicable (c) Yes (c)(i) It will be considered for funding as part of the annual State budgetary process. (c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(a)(ii) $1 161 127 (a)(iii) Not applicable (b) Yes (b)(i) $340 144 in 2013-14. (b)(ii) Preconstruction, reseal and improve formation. (b)(iii) Not applicable (c) Yes (c)(i) It will be considered for funding as part of the annual State budgetary process. (c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(a)(iii) Not applicable (b) Yes (b)(i) $340 144 in 2013-14. (b)(ii) Preconstruction, reseal and improve formation. (b)(iii) Not applicable (c) Yes (c)(i) It will be considered for funding as part of the annual State budgetary process. (c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(b) Yes (b)(i) $340 144 in 2013-14. (b)(ii) Preconstruction, reseal and improve formation. (b)(iii) Not applicable (c) Yes (c)(i) It will be considered for funding as part of the annual State budgetary process. (c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(b)(i) $340 144 in 2013-14. (b)(ii) Preconstruction, reseal and improve formation. (b)(iii) Not applicable (c) Yes (c)(i) It will be considered for funding as part of the annual State budgetary process. (c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(b)(ii) Preconstruction, reseal and improve formation. (b)(iii) Not applicable (c) Yes (c)(i) It will be considered for funding as part of the annual State budgetary process. (c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(b)(iii) Not applicable (c) Yes (c)(i) It will be considered for funding as part of the annual State budgetary process. (c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(c) Yes (c)(i) It will be considered for funding as part of the annual State budgetary process. (c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(c)(i) It will be considered for funding as part of the annual State budgetary process. (c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(a)(i) Construct and seal a section of the road and reseal. (a)(ii) $1 161 127 (a)(iii) Not applicable (b) Yes (b)(i) $340 144 in 2013-14. (b)(ii) Preconstruction, reseal and improve formation. (b)(iii) Not applicable (c) Yes (c)(i) It will be considered for funding as part of the annual State budgetary process. (c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(a)(ii) $1 161 127 (a)(iii) Not applicable (b) Yes (b)(i) $340 144 in 2013-14. (b)(ii) Preconstruction, reseal and improve formation. (b)(iii) Not applicable (c) Yes (c)(i) It will be considered for funding as part of the annual State budgetary process. (c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(a)(iii) Not applicable (b) Yes (b)(i) $340 144 in 2013-14. (b)(ii) Preconstruction, reseal and improve formation. (b)(iii) Not applicable (c) Yes (c)(i) It will be considered for funding as part of the annual State budgetary process. (c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(b) Yes (b)(i) $340 144 in 2013-14. (b)(ii) Preconstruction, reseal and improve formation. (b)(iii) Not applicable (c) Yes (c)(i) It will be considered for funding as part of the annual State budgetary process. (c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(b)(i) $340 144 in 2013-14. (b)(ii) Preconstruction, reseal and improve formation. (b)(iii) Not applicable (c) Yes (c)(i) It will be considered for funding as part of the annual State budgetary process. (c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(b)(ii) Preconstruction, reseal and improve formation. (b)(iii) Not applicable (c) Yes (c)(i) It will be considered for funding as part of the annual State budgetary process. (c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(b)(iii) Not applicable (c) Yes (c)(i) It will be considered for funding as part of the annual State budgetary process. (c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(c) Yes (c)(i) It will be considered for funding as part of the annual State budgetary process. (c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(c)(i) It will be considered for funding as part of the annual State budgetary process. (c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(c)(ii) Not applicable (d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
(d) Although Main Roads is unable to provide a definitive number of approaches by the Shire of Broome, it acknowledges Council has contacted it on numerous occasions to discuss the road.
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.