❓ A Western Australian parliamentary question addresses protocols, contamination management, liability, and compensation related to Roundup Ready canola trials. The government outlines existing regulatory frameworks and declines to offer direct compensation for contamination.
AnsweredQoN 445Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
(a) under what form of protocols are the trials to be conducted;
(b) what mechanisms will be in place if the trials result in contamination of adjacent properties;
(c) who will accept liability if there is contamination; and
(d) does the Government intend to recompense adjacent properties if there is detectable contamination?
(b) what mechanisms will be in place if the trials result in contamination of adjacent properties;
(c) who will accept liability if there is contamination; and
(d) does the Government intend to recompense adjacent properties if there is detectable contamination?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
7 April 2009
Responded by
Minister for Agriculture and Food
Response time
28 days
(a) The trials will be conducted on farms accredited by CBH (Better Farm Integrated Quality), and Monsanto (Stewardship protocols for Roundup Ready canola). The proponents will also require the approval of the Director General of Agriculture and Food. The trial sites will be closely managed and monitored by industry and audited by the Department of Agriculture and Food. Post-trial monitoring will be conducted in accordance with the Department of Agriculture and Food protocols.
(b) Any unintended presence of Roundup Ready canola will be managed by Officers authorized under the
GM Crops Free Areas Act 2003
.
(c) Should a situation of alleged loss caused by GM to a non-GM crop arise, the person suffering the damage could seek redress through an action for negligence, nuisance or trespass, depending on the circumstances involved. The need for governments to impose some kind of statutory liability on GM farmers was examined in 2005-06 during the review of the Commonwealth
Gene Technology Act 2000
and no necessity for government intervention was identified.
(d) No
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
(b) Any unintended presence of Roundup Ready canola will be managed by Officers authorized under the
GM Crops Free Areas Act 2003
.
(c) Should a situation of alleged loss caused by GM to a non-GM crop arise, the person suffering the damage could seek redress through an action for negligence, nuisance or trespass, depending on the circumstances involved. The need for governments to impose some kind of statutory liability on GM farmers was examined in 2005-06 during the review of the Commonwealth
Gene Technology Act 2000
and no necessity for government intervention was identified.
(d) No
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.