❓ Mr. Hyde questions the Minister about the City of Swan and Heritage Council's actions regarding the Guildford Hotel's structural integrity, specifically concerning a Structerre report. The Minister clarifies that the Heritage Council did not seek a response from the owners, citing the report's findings on non-heritage elements and facade stability.
AnsweredQoN 8805Legislative Assembly
QuestionView source ↗
In relation to the ongoing deterioration of the State Heritage-listed Guildford Hotel, I ask the Minister has the City of Swan or the Heritage Council asked the hotel owners for their response to Structerre's revised opinion of March 2012 regarding the structural integrity of the Hotel; and
(a) if yes, what response have the owners of the Guildford Hotel provided; and
(b) if no, why not?
(a) if yes, what response have the owners of the Guildford Hotel provided; and
(b) if no, why not?
AnswerView source ↗
Answered
6 November 2012
Responded by
Minister for Heritage
Response time
40 days
(a) The Heritage Council has not sought a response from the owners in regards to Structerre's report of March 2012.
(b) The Structerre report observed that some elements of the building that are not of heritage significance and form part of the scope for demolition upon the pending redevelopment may require stabilisation in the future to remain in a safe condition prior to redevelopment. The report also noted that the stabilised facades, which form part of the identified cultural heritage significance of the place and will be retained in the redevelopment, remain stable.
In its report Structerre said that at the time of inspection, it did not believe that additional stabilisation is required.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
(b) The Structerre report observed that some elements of the building that are not of heritage significance and form part of the scope for demolition upon the pending redevelopment may require stabilisation in the future to remain in a safe condition prior to redevelopment. The report also noted that the stabilised facades, which form part of the identified cultural heritage significance of the place and will be retained in the redevelopment, remain stable.
In its report Structerre said that at the time of inspection, it did not believe that additional stabilisation is required.
Notice: This document is created or edited using unregistered or evaluation copy of rtLib valid for testing or development purposes only. To use it for productive or any other purposes please register it. You may purchase the license on
http://www.rtlib.com
Explore WA Government Data
Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.
Explore more
Government Gazette
Appointments, regulatory notices, planning changes.
Hansard
Debates, questions, speeches and sentiment.
Tabled Papers
Reports and documents tabled in Parliament.
Committees
Committee profiles and recent reports.
Regulations
Subsidiary legislation with filters and summaries.
Bills
Proposed laws and parliamentary progress.
Acts
Current WA legislation and summaries.
Explanatory Memoranda
Bills with EMs (text/PDF) available.
Members
MP profiles, party breakdown and rankings.
Pollie Rankings
Data-driven rankings across 19 categories.
Amendment Chains
Track how schemes and regulations evolve over time.