Question regarding the decision to accept Dr. Fong's resignation instead of sacking him, and the associated payout. The Minister assures that the payout was legally compliant.

AnsweredQoN 38Legislative Assembly
Asked
10 March 2008
Portfolio
Health

QuestionView source ↗

DR NEALE FONG — PAYOUT
I ask a supplementary question. Given that there were clear grounds for sacking Dr Fong, why did the minister not do so and thereby save Western Australian taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars? Mr J.A. McGINTY

AnswerView source ↗

Dr Fong resigned in the aftermath of the CCC report, which made certain findings in respect of him. We accepted his resignation, and we made it quite clear that any payouts would be strictly in accordance with what Dr Fong was legally entitled to, and not a cent more.
Mr J.A. McGINTY replied: Dr Fong resigned in the aftermath of the CCC report, which made certain findings in respect of him. We accepted his resignation, and we made it quite clear that any payouts would be strictly in accordance with what Dr Fong was legally entitled to, and not a cent more.
Dr Fong resigned in the aftermath of the CCC report, which made certain findings in respect of him. We accepted his resignation, and we made it quite clear that any payouts would be strictly in accordance with what Dr Fong was legally entitled to, and not a cent more.

Explore WA Government Data

Search the full archive in the free dashboard, or query programmatically via API.

Explore more